Bourbotte-Salmon Florian, Ferry Tristan, Cardinale Mickaël, Servien Elvire, Rongieras Frédéric, Fessy Michel-Henry, Bertani Antoine, Laurent Frédéric, Buffe-Lidove Margaux, Batailler Cécile, Lustig Sébastien
Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Surgery, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France.
Service des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Front Surg. 2021 Sep 20;8:551814. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.551814. eCollection 2021.
Management of chronic infection following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is challenging. Rotating hinged prostheses are often required in this setting due to severe bone loss, ligamentous insufficiency, or a combination of the two. The nature of the mechanical and septic complications occurring in this setting has not been well-described. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient outcomes using a hinge knee prosthesis for prosthetic knee infections and to investigate risk factors for implant removal. This was a retrospective cohort study that included all patients treated in our tertiary level referral center between January 2009 and December 2016 for prosthetic knee infection with a hinge knee prosthesis. Only patients with a minimum 2-year of follow-up were included. Functional evaluation was performed using international knee society (IKS) "Knee" and "Function" scores. Survival analysis comparing implant removal risks for mechanical and septic causes was performed using Cox univariate analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves. Risk factors for implant removal and septic failure were assessed. Forty-six knees were eligible for inclusion. The majority of patients had satisfactory functional outcomes as determined by mean IKS scores (mean knee score: 70.53, mean function score: 46.53 points, and mean knee flexion: 88.75°). The 2-year implant survival rate was 89% but dropped to 65% at 7 years follow-up. The risk of failure (i.e., implant removal) was higher for septic etiology compared to mechanical causes. Patients with American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) score>1, immunosuppression, or with peripheral arterial diseases had a higher risk for septic failure. Patients with acute infection according to the Tsukayamaclassification had a higher risk of failure. Of the 46 patients included, 19 (41.3%) had atleast one infectious event on the surgical knee and most of these were superinfections (14/19) with new pathogens isolated. Among pathogens responsible for superinfections (i) cefazolin and gentamicin were both active in six of the cases but failed to prevent the superinfection; (ii) cefazolin and/or gentamicin were not active in eight patients, leading to alternative systemic and/or local antimicrobial prophylaxis consideration. Patients with chronic total knee arthroplasty (TKA) infection, requiring revision using rotating hinge implant, had good functional outcomes but experienced a high rate of septic failure, mostly due to bacterial superinfection. These patients may need optimal antimicrobial systemic prophylaxis and innovative approaches to reduce the rate of superinfection.
全膝关节置换术(TKA)后慢性感染的管理具有挑战性。由于严重的骨质流失、韧带功能不全或两者兼而有之,这种情况下通常需要使用旋转铰链式假体。这种情况下发生的机械和感染并发症的性质尚未得到充分描述。本研究的目的是评估使用铰链膝关节假体治疗人工膝关节感染的患者预后,并调查植入物取出的危险因素。这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了2009年1月至2016年12月期间在我们三级转诊中心接受铰链膝关节假体治疗人工膝关节感染的所有患者。仅纳入随访至少2年的患者。使用国际膝关节协会(IKS)的“膝关节”和“功能”评分进行功能评估。使用Cox单因素分析和Kaplan-Meier曲线进行生存分析,比较机械性和感染性原因导致的植入物取出风险。评估植入物取出和感染性失败的危险因素。46个膝关节符合纳入标准。根据IKS平均评分确定,大多数患者的功能预后良好(平均膝关节评分:70.53,平均功能评分:46.53分,平均膝关节屈曲度:88.75°)。2年植入物生存率为89%,但在7年随访时降至65%。与机械性原因相比,感染性病因导致的失败(即植入物取出)风险更高。美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分>1、免疫抑制或患有外周动脉疾病的患者发生感染性失败的风险更高。根据Tsukayama分类为急性感染的患者失败风险更高。在纳入的46例患者中,19例(41.3%)手术膝关节至少发生一次感染事件,其中大多数是新病原体分离引起的二重感染(14/19)。在导致二重感染的病原体中,(i)头孢唑林和庆大霉素在6例中均有活性,但未能预防二重感染;(ii)头孢唑林和/或庆大霉素在8例患者中无活性,导致考虑替代的全身和/或局部抗菌预防措施。需要使用旋转铰链植入物进行翻修的慢性全膝关节置换术(TKA)感染患者功能预后良好,但感染性失败率较高,主要是由于细菌二重感染。这些患者可能需要最佳的全身抗菌预防措施和创新方法来降低二重感染率。