I'Anson Price Robbie, Segers Francisca, Berger Amelia, Nascimento Fabio S, Grüter Christoph
Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne 1015, Switzerland.
Swiss Centre for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, Genève 1201, Switzerland.
Curr Zool. 2021 May 12;67(5):551-560. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoab043. eCollection 2021 Oct.
Social information is widely used in the animal kingdom and can be highly adaptive. In social insects, foragers can use social information to find food, avoid danger, or choose a new nest site. Copying others allows individuals to obtain information without having to sample the environment. When foragers communicate information they will often only advertise high-quality food sources, thereby filtering out less adaptive information. Stingless bees, a large pantropical group of highly eusocial bees, face intense inter- and intra-specific competition for limited resources, yet display disparate foraging strategies. Within the same environment there are species that communicate the location of food resources to nest-mates and species that do not. Our current understanding of why some species communicate foraging sites while others do not is limited. Studying freely foraging colonies of several co-existing stingless bee species in Brazil, we investigated if recruitment to specific food locations is linked to 1) the sugar content of forage, 2) the duration of foraging trips, and 3) the variation in activity of a colony from 1 day to another and the variation in activity in a species over a day. We found that, contrary to our expectations, species with recruitment communication did not return with higher quality forage than species that do not recruit nestmates. Furthermore, foragers from recruiting species did not have shorter foraging trip durations than those from weakly recruiting species. Given the intense inter- and intraspecific competition for resources in these environments, it may be that recruiting species favor food resources that can be monopolized by the colony rather than food sources that offer high-quality rewards.
社会信息在动物王国中被广泛使用,并且具有高度适应性。在社会性昆虫中,觅食者可以利用社会信息来寻找食物、躲避危险或选择新的巢穴地点。模仿他人使个体能够在无需对环境进行采样的情况下获取信息。当觅食者交流信息时,他们通常只会宣传高质量的食物来源,从而过滤掉适应性较差的信息。无刺蜂是一大类泛热带的高度群居性蜜蜂,它们面临着对有限资源的激烈种间和种内竞争,但却表现出不同的觅食策略。在相同的环境中,有些物种会将食物资源的位置告知巢伴,而有些则不会。我们目前对于为何有些物种会交流觅食地点而有些则不会的理解有限。通过研究巴西几种共存的无刺蜂物种的自由觅食群体,我们调查了对特定食物地点的招募是否与以下因素有关:1)觅食的糖分含量,2)觅食行程的持续时间,以及3)一个群体一天到另一天的活动变化以及一个物种一天内的活动变化。我们发现,与我们的预期相反,具有招募交流的物种带回的觅食质量并不比不招募巢伴的物种更高。此外,来自有招募行为物种的觅食者的觅食行程持续时间并不比来自招募行为较弱物种的觅食者短。鉴于这些环境中对资源的激烈种间和种内竞争,可能是有招募行为的物种更青睐那些可以被群体独占的食物资源,而不是那些能提供高质量回报的食物来源。