• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

时间特征分析:理解时间聚焦特征的本质和结果。

Profiles in time: Understanding the nature and outcomes of profiles of temporal focus.

机构信息

Department of Management and Leadership.

Department of Management and Organizations.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2022 Sep;107(9):1640-1654. doi: 10.1037/apl0000950. Epub 2021 Oct 7.

DOI:10.1037/apl0000950
PMID:34618521
Abstract

Individuals chronically vary in the extent to which they think about the past, present, and future. This individual difference--relates to a variety of work and life outcomes including affective well-being, job performance, and career success. Although it has been proposed that people can simultaneously focus on the past, present, and future (Lewin, 1943), tests of this idea within the organizational sciences remain scarce, with scholars instead focusing on the independent predictions of each aspect of temporal focus. As such, contradictory findings exist regarding the benefits of each dimension. In an effort to advance the discussion of temporal focus in the organizational literature, we present two studies that utilize latent profile analysis (LPA) to examine how people think about time holistically, uncovering initial profiles of past, present, and future temporal focus (Study 1) and demonstrating their effect on important work outcomes related to affect (e.g., job satisfaction, affective commitment) and withdrawal at work (e.g., turnover intentions, absenteeism, lateness; Study 2). Combined, our findings offer theoretical and practical implications that clarify conclusions about temporal focus in organizations and suggest directions for future work. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

个体在思考过去、现在和未来的程度上存在长期差异。这种个体差异与各种工作和生活成果有关,包括情感幸福感、工作绩效和职业成功。虽然有人提出人们可以同时关注过去、现在和未来(Lewin,1943),但组织科学中对这一观点的测试仍然很少,学者们更关注每个时间焦点方面的独立预测。因此,关于每个维度的好处存在矛盾的发现。为了推动组织文献中对时间焦点的讨论,我们进行了两项研究,利用潜在剖面分析(LPA)来全面考察人们思考时间的方式,揭示过去、现在和未来时间焦点的初始剖面(研究 1),并展示它们对与情感相关的重要工作成果(例如,工作满意度、情感承诺)和工作中的退出(例如,离职意向、旷工、迟到)的影响(研究 2)。综合来看,我们的研究结果提供了理论和实践意义,澄清了关于组织中时间焦点的结论,并为未来的工作提供了方向。

相似文献

1
Profiles in time: Understanding the nature and outcomes of profiles of temporal focus.时间特征分析:理解时间聚焦特征的本质和结果。
J Appl Psychol. 2022 Sep;107(9):1640-1654. doi: 10.1037/apl0000950. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
2
Who withdraws? Psychological individual differences and employee withdrawal behaviors.谁会离职?心理个体差异与员工离职行为。
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Apr;101(4):498-519. doi: 10.1037/apl0000068. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
3
The impact of role stress on workers' behaviour through job satisfaction and organizational commitment.角色压力对员工行为的影响——通过工作满意度和组织承诺。
Int J Psychol. 2009 Jun;44(3):187-94. doi: 10.1080/00207590701700511.
4
Changes to the work-family interface during the COVID-19 pandemic: Examining predictors and implications using latent transition analysis.新冠肺炎大流行期间工作-家庭界面的变化:使用潜在转变分析考察预测因素及其影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Oct;105(10):1073-1087. doi: 10.1037/apl0000819. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
5
How can employers benefit most from developmental job experiences? The needs-supplies fit perspective.雇主如何能从发展性工作经验中获益最多?需求-供给匹配视角。
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Apr;105(4):422-432. doi: 10.1037/apl0000449. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
6
It's all in the attitude: The role of job attitude strength in job attitude-outcome relationships.态度决定一切:工作态度强度在工作态度与结果关系中的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Jul;100(4):1259-74. doi: 10.1037/a0038664. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
7
Relationship between ethical work climate and nurses' perception of organizational support, commitment, job satisfaction and turnover intent.道德工作氛围与护士对组织支持、承诺、工作满意度及离职意愿的认知之间的关系。
Nurs Ethics. 2017 Mar;24(2):151-166. doi: 10.1177/0969733015594667. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
8
An initial examination of the work as calling theory.对这项工作作为调用理论的初步考察。
J Couns Psychol. 2019 Apr;66(3):328-340. doi: 10.1037/cou0000318. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
9
A catastrophe model of employee withdrawal leading to low job performance, high absenteeism, and job turnover during the first year of employment.一个员工离职的灾难模型,该模型导致员工在入职第一年工作表现不佳、旷工率高和离职率高。
Acad Manage J. 1985 Mar;28(1):88-109.
10
How do instrumental and expressive network positions relate to turnover? A meta-analytic investigation.工具性和表达性网络地位如何与离职相关?一项元分析研究。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Apr;104(4):511-536. doi: 10.1037/apl0000351. Epub 2018 Oct 18.