Palavecino Elizabeth L, Soltani Sohaila, Keller Ryan, Elliott Stephanie, McNeil Candice J
From the Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine and Wake Forest Baptist Health.
Section on Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
Sex Transm Dis. 2022 Jan 1;49(1):e11-e12. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001499.
This study evaluated the performance of manual rapid plasma reagin (RPR) and automated AIX1000 RPR tests for the diagnosis of syphilis. Manual RPR showed a 3% reactive result compared with 5.8% for the automated test mainly because of RPR reactive results with low titers not confirmed by Treponema pallidum particle agglutination.
本研究评估了手动快速血浆反应素（RPR）试验和自动AIX1000 RPR试验在梅毒诊断中的性能。手动RPR试验的反应性结果为3%，而自动试验为5.8%，主要原因是RPR低滴度反应性结果未被梅毒螺旋体颗粒凝集试验所证实。
