Akizawa Tadao, Yamada Takashi, Nobori Kiyoshi, Matsuda Yoshimi, Hayashi Yasuhiro, Hayasaki Takanori, Yamamoto Hiroyasu
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Research and Development Japan, Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Kidney Int Rep. 2021 Jul 23;6(10):2604-2616. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.07.015. eCollection 2021 Oct.
Molidustat, a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor for renal anemia treatment, was evaluated in 5 phase 3 studies (MIYABI program). We report the results of the MIYABI hemodialysis-maintenance study.
This 52-week, randomized, double-blinded, double-dummy study compared the efficacy and safety of molidustat and darbepoetin in Japanese patients receiving hemodialysis and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Molidustat (starting dose: 75 mg/day) and darbepoetin were titrated to maintain hemoglobin (Hb) levels in the target range (≥10.0 and <12.0 g/dl). Primary outcomes were mean Hb level during the evaluation period (weeks 33-36) and its change from baseline. Safety outcomes included adverse events.
Overall, 229 patients were randomized (molidustat, = 153; darbepoetin, = 76). Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Mean baseline Hb level was 10.8 g/dl. Mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) for mean Hb levels during the evaluation period were within the target range in both groups (molidustat: 10.63 [10.42-10.84] g/dl; darbepoetin: 10.77 [10.59-10.95] g/dl). Least-squares mean (95% CI) change in mean Hb level during the evaluation period from baseline was -0.14 (-0.37 to 0.09) g/dl for molidustat and -0.07 (-0.30 to 0.16) g/dl for darbepoetin; molidustat was noninferior to darbepoetin (least-squares mean difference [95% CI] [molidustat-darbepoetin]: -0.13 [-0.46 to 0.19] g/dl), based on a noninferiority margin of 1.0 g/dl. In line with published literature, and as expected in this patient population, most participants had ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event.
Molidustat maintained Hb levels throughout the trial in patients receiving dialysis and previously treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, and was noninferior to darbepoetin.
莫利度司他是一种用于治疗肾性贫血的缺氧诱导因子脯氨酰羟化酶抑制剂,已在5项3期研究(宫比计划)中进行了评估。我们报告了宫比血液透析维持研究的结果。
这项为期52周的随机、双盲、双模拟研究比较了莫利度司他和达贝泊汀在接受血液透析且正在使用促红细胞生成剂的日本患者中的疗效和安全性。莫利度司他(起始剂量:75毫克/天)和达贝泊汀进行滴定以将血红蛋白(Hb)水平维持在目标范围内(≥10.0且<12.0克/分升)。主要结局为评估期(第33 - 36周)的平均Hb水平及其相对于基线的变化。安全性结局包括不良事件。
总体而言,229例患者被随机分组(莫利度司他组,n = 153;达贝泊汀组,n = 76)。基线特征均衡良好。平均基线Hb水平为10.8克/分升。两组评估期内平均Hb水平的均值(95%置信区间[CI])均在目标范围内(莫利度司他组:10.63[10.42 - 10.84]克/分升;达贝泊汀组:10.77[10.59 - 10.95]克/分升)。评估期内平均Hb水平相对于基线的最小二乘均值(95%CI)变化,莫利度司他组为 - 0.1( - 0.37至0.09)克/分升,达贝泊汀组为 - 0.07( - 0.30至0.16)克/分升;基于非劣效性界值1.0克/分升,莫利度司他不劣于达贝泊汀(最小二乘均值差异[95%CI][莫利度司他 - 达贝泊汀]: - [ - 0.46至0.19]克/分升)。与已发表文献一致,且正如该患者群体所预期的,大多数参与者发生了≥1次治疗中出现的不良事件。
在接受透析且先前接受过促红细胞生成剂治疗的患者中,莫利度司他在整个试验过程中维持了Hb水平,且不劣于达贝泊汀。