Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Oct 8;100(40):e27396. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027396.
Western medicine has played an essential role in treating poststroke insomnia (PSI) in China, and traditional Chinese medicine therapy based on Chinese characteristics is also effective. Combined with China's national conditions, we plan to conduct this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of integrated traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine (INTEGRATED TCM and WM) therapy and Western medicine alone for PSI.
We will search the following 5 electronic databases: PubMed, Wanfang, Chinese biomedical literature database, the Chongqing VIP Chinese Science and Technology Periodical, and China national knowledge infrastructure. Randomized controlled trials that compared the efficacy of INTEGRATED TCM and WM with Western medicine alone in the treatment of PSI will be considered. Primary outcomes have Treatment effectiveness rate, and Pittsburgh sleep quality index. Secondary outcomes include traditional Chinese medicine syndrome score, Athens insomnia scale, the incidence of adverse reactions, and outcome follow-up. Based on the eligibility criteria, we will conduct literature screening and data extraction. The quality of the included literature will be evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tools. We will use Review Manager software (Version 5.3) for data synthesis and statistical analyses. If sources of heterogeneity exist, we will perform a subgroup analysis or sensitivity analysis. A funnel plot will be used to analyze publication bias.
This study will provide evidence-based medicine evidence for treatment of PSI with INTEGRATED TCM and WM in terms of its efficacy.
This systematic review aims to provide new options for INTEGRATED TCM and WM treatment of PSI in terms of its efficacy.
西药在中国治疗脑卒中后失眠(PSI)中发挥了重要作用,基于中医特色的中医治疗也具有一定疗效。结合我国国情,我们计划进行这项系统评价和荟萃分析,以比较中西医结合治疗与西药单独治疗 PSI 的疗效。
我们将检索以下 5 个电子数据库:PubMed、万方、中国生物医学文献数据库、重庆维普中文科技期刊和中国国家知识基础设施。我们将考虑比较中西医结合治疗与西药单独治疗 PSI 的疗效的随机对照试验。主要结局指标为治疗有效率和匹兹堡睡眠质量指数。次要结局指标包括中医证候评分、雅典失眠量表、不良反应发生率和结局随访。根据纳入标准,我们将进行文献筛选和数据提取。将使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估纳入文献的质量。我们将使用 Review Manager 软件(版本 5.3)进行数据合成和统计分析。如果存在异质性来源,我们将进行亚组分析或敏感性分析。将使用漏斗图分析发表偏倚。
本研究将为中西医结合治疗 PSI 的疗效提供循证医学证据。
本系统评价旨在为中西医结合治疗 PSI 的疗效提供新的选择。