Department of Law, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (UNIMORE), Modena, Italy.
Ann Ig. 2022 May-June;34(3):207-216. doi: 10.7416/ai.2021.2468. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
On April 1, 2021, the Italian Government issued the Decree Law no. 44 establishing COVID-19 compulsory vaccination for healthcare workers. In covering the news, national and international commentators have foreshadowed controversy over its constitutional status. In fact, it seems sensible to wonder if mandatory vaccination is consistent with the right to medical self-determination in the Italian Constitution, and if vaccine mandates that exclusively apply to a specific part of the population can be squared with its Equality Principle. As it happens, both answers are in the affirmative. On the one hand, the Italian Constitution acknowledges medical self-determination, but it explicitly admits of public health coercive measures, as both the text of the Constitution and its original understanding make abundantly clear. On the other, as to the Equality Principle, the scientific literature has long attested to the unique benefits of vaccinating healthcare workers, which seem all the more appropriate amidst a pandemic. Moreover, the government's choice of moderate penalties for vaccine refusal and the temporary nature of the mandatory regime further agree with the Italian Constitutional Court's interpretation of the Equality Principle - the so-called "Reasonableness Criterion." The Decree Law - meanwhile become, with minor modifications, Law 76 of May 28 2021 - is thus expected to pass foreseeable judicial review. However, it would be beneficial if the Italian government more vocally advocated the constitutionality of its vaccination policies in a general effort to contrast vaccine hesitancy.
2021 年 4 月 1 日,意大利政府颁布第 44 号法令,规定医疗保健工作者必须接种 COVID-19 疫苗。在报道这一消息时,国内外评论员都预测其宪法地位会存在争议。事实上,人们有理由怀疑,强制接种疫苗是否符合意大利宪法规定的医疗自决权,以及是否可以将仅适用于特定人群的疫苗接种令与平等原则相协调。事实证明,这两个问题的答案都是肯定的。一方面,意大利宪法承认医疗自决权,但也明确允许采取公共卫生强制措施,这一点无论是从宪法文本还是其最初的理解来看都非常清楚。另一方面,就平等原则而言,科学文献早就证明了为医护人员接种疫苗的独特好处,而在大流行期间,这一好处显得更加重要。此外,政府对疫苗接种拒绝者采取适度的惩罚措施,以及强制性制度的临时性,这也符合意大利宪法法院对平等原则的解释——即所谓的“合理性标准”。该法令——经修正后,成为 2021 年 5 月 28 日的第 76 号法律——因此有望通过可预见的司法审查。然而,如果意大利政府更积极地倡导其疫苗接种政策的合宪性,以对抗疫苗犹豫,这将是有益的。