Graduate School of Education, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Dev Sci. 2022 Sep;25(5):e13181. doi: 10.1111/desc.13181. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
Children engage cognitive control reactively when they encounter conflicts; however, they can also resolve conflicts proactively. Recent studies have begun to clarify the mechanisms that support the use of proactive control in children; nonetheless, sufficient knowledge has not been accumulated regarding these mechanisms. Using behavioral and pupillometric measures, we tested the novel possibility that 5-year-old children (N = 58) learn to use proactive control via the acquisition of abstract task knowledge that captures regularities of the task. Participants were assigned to either a proactive training group or a control training group. In the proactive training group, participants engaged in a training phase where using proactive control was encouraged, followed by a test phase using different stimuli where both proactive and reactive control could be used. In the control training group, participants engaged in a training phase where both cognitive control strategies could be used, followed by a similarly-structured test phase using different stimuli. We demonstrated children in the control training group responded more quickly and accurately and showed greater cue-related pupil dilation in the test phase than in the training phase. However, there were no differences in response times, accuracies, and pupil dilation between the proactive and control training groups in the training and test phases. These findings suggest that prior task experience, that goes beyond specific knowledge about the timing of task goal activation, can lead children to engage more proactive control endogenously, even if they are not directly encouraged to do so.
儿童在遇到冲突时会被动地运用认知控制;但他们也可以主动地解决冲突。最近的研究开始阐明支持儿童主动控制使用的机制;然而,对于这些机制,还没有足够的知识积累。使用行为和瞳孔测量法,我们测试了一个新的可能性,即 5 岁儿童(N=58)通过获得捕捉任务规律的抽象任务知识来学习使用主动控制。参与者被分配到主动训练组或控制训练组。在主动训练组中,参与者进行了一个训练阶段,鼓励他们使用主动控制,然后是一个使用不同刺激的测试阶段,在这个阶段可以使用主动和被动控制。在控制训练组中,参与者进行了一个训练阶段,在这个阶段可以使用两种认知控制策略,然后是一个类似结构的使用不同刺激的测试阶段。我们证明,与控制训练组相比,控制训练组的儿童在测试阶段的反应更快、更准确,并且瞳孔扩张与线索的相关性更大。然而,在训练和测试阶段,主动和控制训练组之间在反应时间、准确性和瞳孔扩张方面没有差异。这些发现表明,先前的任务经验,超越了关于任务目标激活时间的具体知识,可以使儿童主动地进行更多的控制,即使他们没有被直接鼓励这样做。