Suppr超能文献

儿科重症监护病房中危重病患儿父母陪伴现状:范围综述。

Parental presence at the bedside of critically ill children in the pediatric intensive care unit: A scoping review.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.

Department of Pediatric Critical Care, IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada.

出版信息

Eur J Pediatr. 2022 Feb;181(2):823-831. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-04279-6. Epub 2021 Oct 9.

Abstract

Parental presence at the bedside (PPB) of critically ill children in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) is necessary for operationalizing family-centred care. Previous evidence syntheses emphasize parent-healthcare provider interactions at rounds and resuscitation; our focus is the parent-child dyad. Prior to embarking on further study, we performed a scoping review to determine the breadth and scope of the literature addressing PPB of critically ill children in the PICU. We searched five online databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and PSYCHINFO) and the grey literature to identify English and French reports from January 1960 to June 2020 addressing physical parental presence with children (birth to 18 years) in intensive care units, without limitation by methodology. Screening, reference selection, and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. Data were extracted into a researcher-designed tool. We identified 204 publications (81 quantitative, 68 qualitative, 22 mixed methods, and 9 descriptive case or practice change studies, and a further 24 non-study reports). PPB was directly assessed in 78 (38%) reports, and was the primary objective in 64 (31%). Amount or quality of presence was addressed by 114 reports, barriers and enablers by 152 sources, and impacts and outcomes by 134 sources. While only 6 reports were published in the first two decades of our search (1960-1980), 17 reports were published in 2019 alone. Conclusions: A relatively large body of literature exists addressing PPB of critically ill children. Separate systematic evidence syntheses to assess each element of PPB are warranted. Scoping review protocol registration: Open science framework, protocol nx6v3, registered 9-September-2019. What is Known: • Parental presence at the bedside of critically ill children must be enabled to facilitate family centeredness in care. • Systematic evidence syntheses have focused on parental presence at rounds or resuscitation, rather than with the child throughout the intensive care journey. What is New: • Many reports (n=204) address parental presence at the bedside in the pediatric intensive care unit, though most do as incidental findings • Identifies studies addressing key elements of parental presence in the PICU including barriers and enablers to, amount and quality of, and impact and outcomes of parental presence, and demonstrates trends over time and geography.

摘要

父母在儿童重症监护病房(PICU)床边的陪伴(PPB)对于实施以家庭为中心的护理是必要的。以前的证据综合强调了家长-医疗保健提供者在查房和复苏时的互动;我们的重点是父母-孩子的二人关系。在进一步研究之前,我们进行了范围界定审查,以确定文献中关于 PICU 中重病儿童的 PPB 的广度和范围。我们在五个在线数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、Cochrane 图书馆和 PSYCHINFO)和灰色文献中搜索了从 1960 年 1 月至 2020 年 6 月的英语和法语报告,这些报告没有方法限制,涉及到儿童(出生至 18 岁)在重症监护病房中父母的物理陪伴。筛选、参考文献选择和数据提取由两名独立的审查员进行。数据被提取到一个研究人员设计的工具中。我们确定了 204 篇出版物(81 篇定量、68 篇定性、22 篇混合方法和 9 篇描述性病例或实践变化研究,以及另外 24 篇非研究报告)。直接评估 PPB 的报告有 78 篇(38%),以 PPB 为主要目标的报告有 64 篇(31%)。114 篇报告涉及存在的数量或质量,152 篇报告涉及障碍和促进因素,134 篇报告涉及影响和结果。虽然只有 6 篇报告发表在我们搜索的前 20 年(1960-1980 年),但仅 2019 年就发表了 17 篇报告。结论:关于重病儿童的 PPB 存在着大量的文献。需要进行单独的系统证据综合评估,以评估 PPB 的每个要素。范围界定审查方案注册:开放科学框架,方案 nx6v3,2019 年 9 月 9 日注册。已知: • 必须允许父母在重病儿童的床边陪伴,以促进护理中的以家庭为中心。 • 系统证据综合侧重于父母在查房或复苏时的存在,而不是在整个重症监护过程中与孩子在一起。新发现: • 许多报告(n=204)涉及儿童重症监护病房的父母床边陪伴,但大多数只是附带发现。 • 确定了在 PICU 中涉及父母存在的关键要素的研究,包括父母存在的障碍和促进因素、数量和质量、以及父母存在的影响和结果,并展示了随时间和地理位置的趋势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eeb/8501356/d32bf94151bf/431_2021_4279_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验