Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire.
J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2022 Mar-Apr;11(2):79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2021.08.004. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
Molecular testing has helped clinicians and cytopathologists to further categorize indeterminate thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA) specimens. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of commercially available molecular tests, review their effects on patient treatment, and correlate the molecular alterations with the histologic findings.
A pathology laboratory information system search identified thyroid FNAs performed at our institution between January 1, 2015 and June 30, 2020. The results of surgical follow-up and ancillary molecular testing were collected. We evaluated the accuracy of these tests and whether they could reduce the number of surgeries performed.
Our laboratory information system search identified 510 cases reported as atypia of undetermined significance, 94 as suspicious for follicular neoplasm, and 44 as suspicious for follicular neoplasm, Hurthle cell type. Of the specimens, 343 had no ancillary molecular testing, 146 were sent for ThyGenX/ThyraMIR, and 136 were sent for ThyroSeq. Of the patients without molecular testing, 50.4% had undergone follow-up surgery compared with 30.8% after ThyGenX/ThyraMIR and 38.2% after ThyroSeq testing, resulting in 38.9% and 24.2% fewer surgeries and an odds ratio of 0.04 (95% confidence interval, 0.00-0.33) and 0.14 (95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.95), respectively. For ThyGenX/ThyraMIR testing, the risk of malignancy for high and moderate to high risk alterations was 80%, 28.6% for moderate and low to moderate risk alterations, and 23.1% for low risk alterations. For ThyroSeq, the risk of malignancy was 87.5% for high risk alterations, 36.8% for intermediate to high risk alterations, 27.3% for intermediate risk alterations, and 0% for low risk alterations. The areas under the curve for ThyGenX/ThyraMIR and ThyroSeq testing were 0.65 and 0.85, respectively.
These findings suggest that, at our institution, both ThygenX/ThyraMIR and ThyroSeq can be used to effectively stratify cytology specimens based on the risk of malignancy and reduce the number of surgeries performed at our institution.
分子检测帮助临床医生和细胞病理学家进一步对不确定的甲状腺细针抽吸(FNA)标本进行分类。本研究的目的是评估商业上可用的分子检测的准确性,回顾其对患者治疗的影响,并将分子改变与组织学发现相关联。
通过对我院 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 6 月 30 日进行的甲状腺 FNA 的病理实验室信息系统检索,识别出甲状腺 FNAs。收集了手术随访和辅助分子检测的结果。我们评估了这些检测的准确性,以及它们是否可以减少手术的数量。
我们的实验室信息系统检索确定了 510 例报告为不明确意义的非典型性、94 例为滤泡性肿瘤可疑、44 例为 Hurthle 细胞型滤泡性肿瘤可疑。在这些标本中,343 例没有辅助分子检测,146 例送检 ThyGenX/ThyraMIR,136 例送检 ThyroSeq。在没有分子检测的患者中,50.4%的患者接受了随访手术,而在 ThyGenX/ThyraMIR 检测后,30.8%的患者和 ThyroSeq 检测后,38.2%的患者接受了随访手术,分别减少了 38.9%和 24.2%的手术次数,优势比为 0.04(95%置信区间,0.00-0.33)和 0.14(95%置信区间,0.01-0.95)。对于 ThyGenX/ThyraMIR 检测,高风险和中高度风险改变的恶性风险为 80%,中度和低度中度风险改变的恶性风险为 28.6%,低度风险改变的恶性风险为 23.1%。对于 ThyroSeq,高风险改变的恶性风险为 87.5%,中高度风险改变的恶性风险为 36.8%,中度风险改变的恶性风险为 27.3%,低度风险改变的恶性风险为 0%。ThygenX/ThyraMIR 和 ThyroSeq 检测的曲线下面积分别为 0.65 和 0.85。
这些发现表明,在我们的机构中,ThygenX/ThyraMIR 和 ThyroSeq 都可以用于根据恶性风险有效分层细胞学标本,并减少我们机构的手术数量。