Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Dec;20(12):2728-2740.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.10.002. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with Crohn's disease (CD) treated with ustekinumab who experience inadequate response, or loss of response after standard induction and/or maintenance dosing may benefit from dose escalation. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effectiveness of reinduction and/or dose interval shortening of ustekinumab in patients with active CD despite standard induction and maintenance.
Through a systematic literature search through March 31, 2021, we identified 15 cohort studies in 925 adults with CD with inadequate response or loss of response to standard dose ustekinumab, underwent dose escalation (reinduction and/or dose interval shortening to <8 weeks), and reported rates of achieving clinical response, corticosteroid-free clinical remission, endoscopic response, and/or remission. We calculated pooled rates (with 95% confidence intervals) using random effects meta-analysis and examined factors associated with response to dose escalation through qualitative synthesis of individual studies.
On meta-analysis, 55% of patients (95% confidence interval, 52%-58%) with inadequate response or loss of response who underwent ustekinumab dose escalation achieved clinical response, with moderate heterogeneity (I = 57%). Approximately 61% of patients were able to achieve endoscopic response, including 29% who achieved endoscopic remission. Dose interval shortening alone recaptured response in 57% patients. No consistent factors associated with response to dose escalation were identified on qualitative synthesis.
In real word settings, ustekinumab dose escalation was effective in achieving response in patients with CD with inadequate response, or loss of response to standard dose induction and/or maintenance therapy.
接受乌司奴单抗治疗的克罗恩病(CD)患者,如果标准诱导和/或维持剂量后应答不足或应答丧失,可能会从剂量增加中获益。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,研究了在标准诱导和维持治疗后仍处于活动期的 CD 患者中,乌司奴单抗重新诱导和/或缩短剂量间隔对增加剂量的有效性。
通过系统文献检索,我们在 2021 年 3 月 31 日之前确定了 15 项队列研究,这些研究共纳入了 925 名对标准剂量乌司奴单抗应答不足或应答丧失的 CD 成人患者,他们接受了剂量增加(重新诱导和/或缩短剂量间隔至<8 周),并报告了达到临床应答、无皮质激素临床缓解、内镜应答和/或缓解的比率。我们使用随机效应荟萃分析计算了汇总比率(置信区间为 95%),并通过对个体研究的定性综合分析来研究与剂量增加应答相关的因素。
在荟萃分析中,55%(95%置信区间,52%-58%)对标准剂量乌司奴单抗应答不足或应答丧失的患者在接受乌司奴单抗剂量增加后达到了临床应答,存在中度异质性(I=57%)。大约 61%的患者能够达到内镜应答,包括 29%的患者达到了内镜缓解。单独缩短剂量间隔可使 57%的患者重新获得应答。在定性综合分析中,没有发现与剂量增加应答相关的一致因素。
在真实环境中,乌司奴单抗剂量增加在应答不足或标准剂量诱导和/或维持治疗后应答丧失的 CD 患者中是有效的。