• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多中心研究无针采血系统在减少标本误差和静脉导管更换方面的应用。

Multicenter Study of Needle-Free Blood Collection System for Reducing Specimen Error and Intravenous Catheter Replacement.

出版信息

J Healthc Qual. 2022;44(2):e24-e30. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000331.

DOI:10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000331
PMID:34629378
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8887850/
Abstract

Inpatient hospital settings require access to high-quality blood specimens and durable peripheral intravenous (IV) catheters for patient care. The most common standard-of-care method for acquiring each blood specimen-venipuncture-often results in a non-negligible preanalytical error rate, patient discomfort, and tissue inflammation. In a 2-year, multicenter (23 hospitals) retrospective study, a novel blood collection system that collects blood specimens through existing inpatient IVs without a needle (PIVO, Velano Vascular) was compared with the current standard of care, in regards to its effect on specimen quality and IV catheter longevity. Using the PIVOTM device for blood collection decreased the rate of preanalytical errors by 56% compared with other collection methods, including venipuncture and conventional line draws. In addition, peripheral IV catheters that were used with PIVOTM for blood draws also had a 19% lower rate of replacement compared with those that did not. This is the largest study to date of PIVO use and demonstrates significant quality improvement outcomes compared with the current standard of care in blood collection, providing an opportunity to innovate inpatient hospital care.

摘要

住院病房环境需要能够获得高质量的血液标本和耐用的外周静脉(IV)导管,以满足患者护理需求。采集每个血液标本的最常见标准护理方法——静脉穿刺术——通常会导致不可忽视的分析前误差率、患者不适和组织炎症。在一项为期 2 年、多中心(23 家医院)的回顾性研究中,一种新型的血液采集系统通过现有的住院 IV 而无需使用针头(PIVO,Velano Vascular)采集血液标本,与当前的标准护理方法进行了比较,重点关注其对标本质量和 IV 导管寿命的影响。与其他采集方法(包括静脉穿刺术和常规线抽取)相比,使用 PIVOTM 设备进行血液采集可将分析前误差率降低 56%。此外,与未使用 PIVOTM 进行血液采集的外周静脉导管相比,使用 PIVOTM 进行血液采集的导管更换率也降低了 19%。这是迄今为止 PIVO 使用的最大规模研究,与当前的血液采集标准护理相比,其展示了显著的质量改善结果,为创新住院医院护理提供了机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e15/8887850/8f041945e8ef/jhq-44-e24-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e15/8887850/12bd5126d739/jhq-44-e24-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e15/8887850/a4e6974eeccc/jhq-44-e24-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e15/8887850/8f041945e8ef/jhq-44-e24-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e15/8887850/12bd5126d739/jhq-44-e24-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e15/8887850/a4e6974eeccc/jhq-44-e24-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e15/8887850/8f041945e8ef/jhq-44-e24-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Multicenter Study of Needle-Free Blood Collection System for Reducing Specimen Error and Intravenous Catheter Replacement.多中心研究无针采血系统在减少标本误差和静脉导管更换方面的应用。
J Healthc Qual. 2022;44(2):e24-e30. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000331.
2
A Novel Needle-Free Blood Draw Device for Sample Collection From Short Peripheral Catheters.一种用于从短外周导管采集样本的新型无针采血装置。
J Infus Nurs. 2017 May/Jun;40(3):156-162. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000222.
3
Effect of peripheral IV based blood collection on catheter dwell time, blood collection, and patient response.外周静脉采血对导管留置时间、采血和患者反应的影响。
Appl Nurs Res. 2018 Apr;40:76-79. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2017.12.006. Epub 2017 Dec 24.
4
Nursing blood specimen collection techniques and hemolysis rates in an emergency department: analysis of venipuncture versus intravenous catheter collection techniques.急诊科护理血标本采集技术与溶血率:静脉穿刺与静脉留置针采集技术的分析
J Emerg Nurs. 2008 Feb;34(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2007.02.006. Epub 2007 Sep 25.
5
Comparison of two blood sampling methods in anticoagulation therapy: venipuncture and peripheral venous catheter.抗凝治疗中两种采血方法的比较:静脉穿刺与外周静脉导管采血。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Feb;17(3):386-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01858.x. Epub 2007 Mar 30.
6
Blood draws, venipuncture versus intravenous catheter, an alternate conclusion.
J Emerg Nurs. 2008 Jun;34(3):196; author reply 196-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2008.03.005.
7
Blood sample collection from a peripheral catheter system compared with phlebotomy.外周导管系统采血与静脉穿刺采血的比较。
J Intraven Nurs. 2000 Sep-Oct;23(5):290-7.
8
Effect of the PIVO Device on the Procedure of Phlebotomy from Peripheral IV Catheters.PIVO装置对外周静脉留置针采血操作的影响。
Nurs Res Pract. 2018 May 22;2018:7380527. doi: 10.1155/2018/7380527. eCollection 2018.
9
Blood Samples from Midline Catheters: Clinically Equivalent to Venipuncture.中线导管采血与静脉穿刺采集血标本的临床效果相当。
J Infus Nurs. 2024;47(1):36-41. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000527.
10
Accuracy of measurements of hemoglobin and potassium in blood samples from peripheral catheters.外周静脉导管采集血样中血红蛋白和钾的测量准确性。
Am J Crit Care. 1998 Nov;7(6):439-43.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of Hospital-Onset Bacteremia Pre- and Post-Implementation of a Needleless Blood Sampling Device From Existing Peripheral Catheters.现有外周导管预实施和实施无针采血器前后医院获得性菌血症的患病率。
J Infus Nurs. 2023;46(6):332-337. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000513. Epub 2023 Jul 24.