J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Jul 1;109(3):450-458. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.995.
This study investigates research data management (RDM) services using a crosstab framework with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Library as a case study to provide practical considerations for libraries seeking to improve their RDM services.
We conducted semistructured interviews with four librarians who provide data services at the NIH Library regarding library user characteristics, RDM services provided, RDM infrastructure, and collaboration experiences. Through the analysis of interview transcripts, we identified and analyzed the NIH Library's RDM services according to Online Computer Library Center (OCLC)'s three categories of RDM services and the six stages of the data lifecycle.
The findings show that the two models' crosstab framework can provide an overview of an institution's current RDM services and identify service gaps. The NIH Library tends to take more responsibility in providing education and expertise services while relying more on information technology departments for curation services. The library provides significant support for data creation, analysis, and sharing stages to meet biomedical researchers' needs, suggesting areas for potential expansion of RDM services in the less supported stages of data description, storage, and preservation. Based on these findings, we recommend three key considerations for libraries: identify gaps in current services, identify services that can be supported via partnerships, and get regular feedback from users.
These findings provide a deeper understanding of RDM support on the basis of RDM service categories and the data lifecycle and promote discussion of issues to be considered for future improvements in RDM services.
本研究通过 NIH 图书馆的交叉表框架调查研究数据管理 (RDM) 服务,为寻求改善 RDM 服务的图书馆提供实际考虑因素。
我们对 NIH 图书馆的四位提供数据服务的图书馆员进行了半结构化访谈,内容涉及图书馆用户特征、提供的 RDM 服务、RDM 基础设施和合作经验。通过对访谈记录的分析,我们根据 OCLC 的 RDM 服务的三个类别和数据生命周期的六个阶段,确定并分析了 NIH 图书馆的 RDM 服务。
研究结果表明,两个模型的交叉表框架可以提供机构当前 RDM 服务的概述,并确定服务差距。NIH 图书馆倾向于在提供教育和专业知识服务方面承担更多责任,而在策展服务方面更多地依赖信息技术部门。图书馆为数据创建、分析和共享阶段提供了大量支持,以满足生物医学研究人员的需求,这表明在数据描述、存储和保存阶段的支持较少的情况下,RDM 服务有潜在的扩展空间。基于这些发现,我们为图书馆提出了三个关键考虑因素:确定当前服务中的差距、确定可以通过合作伙伴关系支持的服务,以及从用户那里获得定期反馈。
这些发现基于 RDM 服务类别和数据生命周期,更深入地了解了 RDM 支持,并促进了对未来 RDM 服务改进需要考虑的问题的讨论。