• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

图书馆研究数据管理服务的实用考虑因素:以美国国立卫生研究院图书馆为例。

Practical considerations for a library's research data management services: the case of the National Institutes of Health Library.

出版信息

J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Jul 1;109(3):450-458. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.995.

DOI:10.5195/jmla.2021.995
PMID:34629974
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8485941/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates research data management (RDM) services using a crosstab framework with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Library as a case study to provide practical considerations for libraries seeking to improve their RDM services.

METHODS

We conducted semistructured interviews with four librarians who provide data services at the NIH Library regarding library user characteristics, RDM services provided, RDM infrastructure, and collaboration experiences. Through the analysis of interview transcripts, we identified and analyzed the NIH Library's RDM services according to Online Computer Library Center (OCLC)'s three categories of RDM services and the six stages of the data lifecycle.

RESULTS

The findings show that the two models' crosstab framework can provide an overview of an institution's current RDM services and identify service gaps. The NIH Library tends to take more responsibility in providing education and expertise services while relying more on information technology departments for curation services. The library provides significant support for data creation, analysis, and sharing stages to meet biomedical researchers' needs, suggesting areas for potential expansion of RDM services in the less supported stages of data description, storage, and preservation. Based on these findings, we recommend three key considerations for libraries: identify gaps in current services, identify services that can be supported via partnerships, and get regular feedback from users.

CONCLUSION

These findings provide a deeper understanding of RDM support on the basis of RDM service categories and the data lifecycle and promote discussion of issues to be considered for future improvements in RDM services.

摘要

目的

本研究通过 NIH 图书馆的交叉表框架调查研究数据管理 (RDM) 服务,为寻求改善 RDM 服务的图书馆提供实际考虑因素。

方法

我们对 NIH 图书馆的四位提供数据服务的图书馆员进行了半结构化访谈,内容涉及图书馆用户特征、提供的 RDM 服务、RDM 基础设施和合作经验。通过对访谈记录的分析,我们根据 OCLC 的 RDM 服务的三个类别和数据生命周期的六个阶段,确定并分析了 NIH 图书馆的 RDM 服务。

结果

研究结果表明,两个模型的交叉表框架可以提供机构当前 RDM 服务的概述,并确定服务差距。NIH 图书馆倾向于在提供教育和专业知识服务方面承担更多责任,而在策展服务方面更多地依赖信息技术部门。图书馆为数据创建、分析和共享阶段提供了大量支持,以满足生物医学研究人员的需求,这表明在数据描述、存储和保存阶段的支持较少的情况下,RDM 服务有潜在的扩展空间。基于这些发现,我们为图书馆提出了三个关键考虑因素:确定当前服务中的差距、确定可以通过合作伙伴关系支持的服务,以及从用户那里获得定期反馈。

结论

这些发现基于 RDM 服务类别和数据生命周期,更深入地了解了 RDM 支持,并促进了对未来 RDM 服务改进需要考虑的问题的讨论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae6f/8485941/d8d1d393df24/jmla-109-3-450-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae6f/8485941/d8d1d393df24/jmla-109-3-450-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae6f/8485941/d8d1d393df24/jmla-109-3-450-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Practical considerations for a library's research data management services: the case of the National Institutes of Health Library.图书馆研究数据管理服务的实用考虑因素:以美国国立卫生研究院图书馆为例。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Jul 1;109(3):450-458. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.995.
2
A model for initiating research data management services at academic libraries.学术图书馆开展研究数据管理服务的模型。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2019 Jul;107(3):432-441. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2019.545. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
3
A new hat for librarians: providing REDCap support to establish the library as a central data hub.为图书馆员准备的新角色:提供REDCap支持,将图书馆打造成核心数据中心。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Jan;106(1):120-126. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.327. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
4
Characterizing the research data management practices of NIH biomedical researchers indicates the need for better support at laboratory level.描述 NIH 生物医学研究人员的研究数据管理实践表明,需要在实验室层面提供更好的支持。
Health Info Libr J. 2022 Dec;39(4):347-356. doi: 10.1111/hir.12433. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
5
Managing a Biomedical Library's Instruction Program: Redefining Scope.管理生物医学图书馆的指导计划:重新定义范围。
Med Ref Serv Q. 2018 Jan-Mar;37(1):97-104. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2017.1404402.
6
A two-tiered curriculum to improve data management practices for researchers.为研究人员设计的两级课程,以提高数据管理实践水平。
PLoS One. 2019 May 1;14(5):e0215509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215509. eCollection 2019.
7
Research data services in veterinary medicine libraries.兽医学图书馆中的研究数据服务。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Oct;104(4):305-308. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.104.4.010.
8
Rigor and reproducibility instruction in academic medical libraries.学术医学图书馆的严谨性和可重复性指导
J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Jul 1;110(3):281-293. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1443.
9
Informationist programme in support of biomedical research: a programme description and preliminary findings of an evaluation.支持生物医学研究的信息专员计划:计划描述及评估初步结果
Health Info Libr J. 2008 Jun;25(2):135-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2007.00756.x.
10
A community of practice: librarians in a biomedical research network.实践共同体:生物医学研究网络中的图书馆员
Med Ref Serv Q. 2014;33(1):60-74. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2014.866487.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in Research Data Management and Academic Health Sciences Libraries.研究数据管理与学术健康科学图书馆的发展趋势。
Med Ref Serv Q. 2023 Jul-Sep;42(3):273-293. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2023.2218776.

本文引用的文献

1
Adapting data management education to support clinical research projects in an academic medical center.调整数据管理教育以支持学术医疗中心的临床研究项目。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2019 Jan;107(1):89-97. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2019.580. Epub 2019 Jan 1.
2
Managing a Biomedical Library's Instruction Program: Redefining Scope.管理生物医学图书馆的指导计划:重新定义范围。
Med Ref Serv Q. 2018 Jan-Mar;37(1):97-104. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2017.1404402.
3
Data Day to Day: building a community of expertise to address data skills gaps in an academic medical center.
日常数据:建立一个专业社区以弥补学术医疗中心的数据技能差距。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Apr;105(2):185-191. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2017.35.
4
Water, Water, Everywhere: Defining and Assessing Data Sharing in Academia.水,无处不在:定义与评估学术界的数据共享
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 17;11(2):e0147942. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147942. eCollection 2016.
5
Data literacy training needs of biomedical researchers.生物医学研究人员的数据素养培训需求
J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Jan;104(1):52-7. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.104.1.008.
6
Biomedical Data Sharing and Reuse: Attitudes and Practices of Clinical and Scientific Research Staff.生物医学数据共享与再利用:临床与科研人员的态度及实践
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 24;10(6):e0129506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129506. eCollection 2015.
7
Research data management and libraries: relationships, activities, drivers and influences.研究数据管理与图书馆:关系、活动、驱动因素及影响
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 8;9(12):e114734. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114734. eCollection 2014.
8
Expanding roles in a library-based bioinformatics service program: a case study.基于图书馆的生物信息学服务项目中不断扩展的角色:一个案例研究
J Med Libr Assoc. 2013 Oct;101(4):303-9. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.101.4.012.
9
Developing E-science and Research Services and Support at the University of Minnesota Health Sciences Libraries.明尼苏达大学健康科学图书馆电子科学与研究服务及支持的发展
J Libr Adm. 2012;52(8):754-769. doi: 10.1080/01930826.2012.751291.