J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Jul 1;109(3):459-463. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1145.
Journal impact factor (IF) inflation is suggested as a problem resulting from commentaries published by the editors in chief (EiCs) of their respective journals. However, it is unclear whether this is a systemic problem across the top thirty cardiovascular medicine journals. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation was to examine the relationship between the number of commentaries written by an EiC and their journal's IF and Eigenfactor (Ef). Utilizing Spearman rank partial correlations controlling for length of service as the EiC, significant moderate correlations were found between the number of commentaries and the number of first-author commentaries by the EiC and the IF of their journal (r=0.568, =0.001 and r=0.504, =0.005; respectively). A weak but still significant correlation was found between the number of commentaries by the EiC and the Ef of their journal (r=0.431, =0.020). The reason for these correlations is unclear, and whether the methodology used to compute the IF and Ef should be modified needs further research.
期刊影响因子(IF)膨胀被认为是主编(EiC)发表评论所导致的问题。然而,目前尚不清楚这是否是前 30 名心血管医学期刊普遍存在的系统性问题。因此,本研究旨在调查 EiC 发表评论的数量与其期刊 IF 和 Eigenfactor(Ef)之间的关系。利用 Spearman 秩分相关,控制 EiC 的服务年限,发现 EiC 发表的评论数量及其期刊 IF(r=0.568,=0.001 和 r=0.504,=0.005)以及第一作者评论数量之间存在显著的中度相关性。EiC 发表的评论数量与期刊 Ef(r=0.431,=0.020)之间也存在微弱但仍显著的相关性。这些相关性的原因尚不清楚,是否需要进一步研究修改 IF 和 Ef 的计算方法。