VanZile Adam W, Snyder Matthew J, Watkins Emily A, Jayawickrema Jithmie, Widenhoefer Tricia L, Almonroeder Thomas G
Optimum Performance Therapy.
Fort Wayne Orthopedics.
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Oct 1;16(5):1278-1285. doi: 10.26603/001c.28088. eCollection 2021.
Athletes who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction typically exhibit relatively high/rapid loading of their uninvolved limb during bilateral landing and jumping (vs. their limb that underwent reconstruction), which may place their uninvolved limb at risk for injury. However, previous studies have only examined forces and loading rates for tasks involving an isolated land-and-jump.
The purpose of this study was to examine bilateral landing and jumping kinetics during performance of a repetitive tuck jump task in athletes who had undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and completed rehabilitation.
Cross-sectional study.
Nine athletes (four males, five females) participated in this study. All participants had undergone successful unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, had completed post-operative rehabilitation, and were in the process of completing return-to-sport testing. Athletes performed a repetitive tuck jump task for 10 seconds, while ground reaction forces were recorded for their uninvolved and involved limbs via separate force platforms. Two-way analysis of variance, for within-subjects factors of limb and cycle, was performed for the impact forces, loading rates, and propulsive forces from the first five land-and-jump cycles completed.
There was not a limb-by-cycle interaction effect or main effect of cycle for the impact forces, loading rates, or propulsive forces; however, there was a main effect of limb for the impact forces (F(1, 8) = 14.64; p=0.005), loading rates (F(1, 8) = 5.60; p=0.046), and propulsive forces (F(1, 8) = 10.38; p=0.012). Impact forces, loading rates, and propulsive forces were higher for the uninvolved limb, compared to the involved limb, over the five land-and-jump cycles analyzed.
The athletes in this study consistently applied higher and more rapid loads to their uninvolved limb over multiple land-and-jump cycles. This may help to explain the relatively high injury rates for the uninvolved limb in athletes who have returned to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
接受前交叉韧带重建的运动员在双侧着陆和跳跃时,其未受伤肢体通常表现出相对较高/较快的负荷(相对于接受重建的肢体),这可能使其未受伤肢体面临受伤风险。然而,以往研究仅考察了涉及单独着陆和跳跃任务的力和负荷率。
本研究旨在考察接受前交叉韧带重建并完成康复的运动员在进行重复团身跳任务时的双侧着陆和跳跃动力学。
横断面研究。
9名运动员(4名男性,5名女性)参与本研究。所有参与者均成功进行了单侧前交叉韧带重建,完成了术后康复,且正在进行重返运动测试。运动员进行10秒的重复团身跳任务,同时通过单独的测力平台记录其未受伤和受伤肢体的地面反作用力。对完成的前五个着陆和跳跃周期的冲击力、负荷率和推进力进行了肢体和周期的组内因素双向方差分析。
对于冲击力、负荷率或推进力,不存在肢体×周期交互效应或周期主效应;然而,对于冲击力(F(1, 8) = 14.64;p = 0.005)、负荷率(F(1, 8) = 5.60;p = 0.046)和推进力(F(1, 8) = 10.38;p = 0.012)存在肢体主效应。在分析的五个着陆和跳跃周期中,未受伤肢体的冲击力、负荷率和推进力高于受伤肢体。
本研究中的运动员在多个着陆和跳跃周期中持续对其未受伤肢体施加更高、更快的负荷。这可能有助于解释前交叉韧带重建后重返运动的运动员中未受伤肢体相对较高的损伤率。