Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
J Orthop Res. 2022 Jan;40(1):208-218. doi: 10.1002/jor.25110. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
We sought to evaluate the sagittal plane knee joint loading patterns during a double-leg landing task among young athletes who passed or failed return-to-sport (RTS) criteria following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction reconstruction (ACLR), and in uninjured athletes. Participants completed quadriceps strength testing, a hop test battery, and the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective form following medical RTS clearance. ACLR participants "passed" RTS criteria (RTS-PASS) if they met ≥90 limb symmetry (%) or score on all measures and were categorized as "failing" (RTS-FAIL) if not. All participants completed three-dimensional motion analysis testing. Sagittal plane kinematic and kinetic variables were calculated during a double-leg drop vertical jump task. Mean limb values and limb symmetry indices (LSI; %) were calculated and compared using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (for LSI) and mixed between-within ANOVA (for group × limb differences). A total of 205 participants were included, with 39 in the RTS-PASS group, 109 in the RTS-FAIL group, and 57 control groups (CTRLs). The RTS-FAIL group demonstrated lower symmetry values for peak vertical ground reaction force, peak internal knee extension moment, and peak knee flexion angle. Group × limb interactions were observed for peak vertical ground reaction force and peak internal knee extension moment. Involved limb values were reduced in the RTS-PASS and RTS-FAIL groups compared to CTRLs, while the RTS-PASS groups had lower uninvolved limb values compared to the RTS-FAIL and CTRLs. Clinical Significance: Young athletes who pass RTS criteria after ACLR land symmetrically during a double-leg task, but symmetry was achieved by reducing loading on both limbs.
我们旨在评估在双足落地任务中,年轻运动员的膝关节矢状面受力模式,这些运动员在经历前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)后通过或未通过重返运动(RTS)标准,以及未受伤的运动员。参与者完成了股四头肌力量测试、跳跃测试组合以及国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)主观评分,随后接受了医学 RTS 清除标准的评估。如果 ACLR 参与者在所有测量中达到≥90%的肢体对称性(%)或分数,他们将通过 RTS 标准(RTS-PASS),如果没有达到,则归类为“失败”(RTS-FAIL)。所有参与者都完成了三维运动分析测试。在双足垂直跳跃任务中计算了矢状面运动学和动力学变量。使用单向方差分析(ANOVA)(用于 LSI)和混合组间-组内方差分析(用于组×肢体差异)计算和比较平均肢体值和肢体对称性指数(LSI;%)。共纳入 205 名参与者,其中 RTS-PASS 组 39 人,RTS-FAIL 组 109 人,对照组(CTRLs)57 人。RTS-FAIL 组的峰值垂直地面反作用力、峰值膝关节内伸力矩和峰值膝关节屈曲角度的对称性值较低。观察到组×肢体相互作用对于峰值垂直地面反作用力和峰值膝关节内伸力矩。与 CTRLs 相比,RTS-PASS 和 RTS-FAIL 组的参与肢体值降低,而 RTS-PASS 组的未参与肢体值低于 RTS-FAIL 和 CTRLs。临床意义:ACL 重建后通过 RTS 标准的年轻运动员在双足任务中对称着地,但通过降低两个肢体的负荷来实现对称性。