Suppr超能文献

立体定向和机器人辅助微创热消融治疗恶性肝肿瘤:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Stereotactic and Robotic Minimally Invasive Thermal Ablation of Malignant Liver Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Tinguely Pascale, Paolucci Iwan, Ruiter Simeon J S, Weber Stefan, de Jong Koert P, Candinas Daniel, Freedman Jacob, Engstrand Jennie

机构信息

Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet at Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 23;11:713685. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.713685. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic navigation techniques aim to enhance treatment precision and safety in minimally invasive thermal ablation of liver tumors. We qualitatively reviewed and quantitatively summarized the available literature on procedural and clinical outcomes after stereotactic navigated ablation of malignant liver tumors.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed on procedural and clinical outcomes when using stereotactic or robotic navigation for laparoscopic or percutaneous thermal ablation. The online databases Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched. Endpoints included targeting accuracy, procedural efficiency, and treatment efficacy outcomes. Meta-analysis including subgroup analyses was performed.

RESULTS

Thirty-four studies (two randomized controlled trials, three prospective cohort studies, 29 case series) were qualitatively analyzed, and 22 studies were included for meta-analysis. Weighted average lateral targeting error was 3.7 mm (CI 3.2, 4.2), with all four comparative studies showing enhanced targeting accuracy compared to free-hand targeting. Weighted average overall complications, major complications, and mortality were 11.4% (6.7, 16.1), 3.4% (2.1, 5.1), and 0.8% (0.5, 1.3). Pooled estimates of primary technique efficacy were 94% (89, 97) if assessed at 1-6 weeks and 90% (87, 93) if assessed at 6-12 weeks post ablation, with remaining between-study heterogeneity. Primary technique efficacy was significantly enhanced in stereotactic vs. free-hand targeting, with odds ratio (OR) of 1.9 (1.2, 3.2) (n = 6 studies).

CONCLUSIONS

Advances in stereotactic navigation technologies allow highly precise and safe tumor targeting, leading to enhanced primary treatment efficacy. The use of varying definitions and terminology of safety and efficacy limits comparability among studies, highlighting the crucial need for further standardization of follow-up definitions.

摘要

背景

立体定向导航技术旨在提高肝脏肿瘤微创热消融治疗的精度和安全性。我们对有关立体定向导航消融恶性肝脏肿瘤后的手术及临床结果的现有文献进行了定性回顾和定量总结。

方法

对使用立体定向或机器人导航进行腹腔镜或经皮热消融时的手术及临床结果进行系统的文献检索。检索了在线数据库Medline、Embase和Cochrane图书馆。终点包括靶向准确性、手术效率和治疗效果。进行了包括亚组分析的荟萃分析。

结果

对34项研究(2项随机对照试验、3项前瞻性队列研究、29项病例系列)进行了定性分析,22项研究纳入荟萃分析。加权平均横向靶向误差为3.7毫米(置信区间3.2, 4.2),所有四项比较研究均显示与徒手靶向相比靶向准确性有所提高。加权平均总体并发症、主要并发症和死亡率分别为11.4%(6.7, 16.1)、3.4%(2.1, 5.1)和0.8%(0.5, 1.3)。如果在消融后1 - 6周进行评估,主要技术疗效的合并估计值为94%(89, 97),如果在消融后6 - 12周进行评估则为90%(87, 93),研究间存在剩余异质性。立体定向靶向与徒手靶向相比,主要技术疗效显著提高,优势比(OR)为1.9(1.2, 3.2)(n = 6项研究)。

结论

立体定向导航技术的进步使肿瘤靶向高度精确且安全,从而提高了初始治疗效果。安全性和疗效的定义及术语各不相同,限制了研究间的可比性,凸显了进一步规范随访定义的迫切需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8b1/8495244/1b080bea16b7/fonc-11-713685-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验