Suppr超能文献

利用机器人导航系统提高恶性肝肿瘤微波消融的主要疗效。

Improvement of the primary efficacy of microwave ablation of malignant liver tumors by using a robotic navigation system.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Center for Clinical Studies, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

Radiol Oncol. 2020 May 28;54(3):295-300. doi: 10.2478/raon-2020-0033.

Abstract

Background The aim of the study was to assess the primary efficacy of robot-assisted microwave ablation and compare it to manually guided microwave ablation for percutaneous ablation of liver malignancies. Patients and methods We performed a retrospective single center evaluation of microwave ablations of 368 liver tumors in 192 patients (36 female, 156 male, mean age 63 years). One hundred and nineteen ablations were performed between 08/2011 and 03/2014 with manual guidance, whereas 249 ablations were performed between 04/2014 and 11/2018 using robotic guidance. A 6-week follow-up (ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) was performed on all patients. Results The primary technique efficacy outcome of the group treated by robotic guidance was significantly higher than that of the manually guided group (88% vs. 76%; p = 0.013). Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that a small tumor size (≤ 3 cm) and robotic guidance were significant favorable prognostic factors for complete ablation. Conclusions In addition to a small tumor size, robotic navigation was a major positive prognostic factor for primary technique efficacy.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估机器人辅助微波消融的主要疗效,并将其与手动引导微波消融治疗肝恶性肿瘤的疗效进行比较。

患者和方法

我们对 192 名患者的 368 个肝脏肿瘤进行了回顾性单中心评估(36 名女性,156 名男性,平均年龄 63 岁)。119 例在 2011 年 8 月至 2014 年 3 月期间采用手动引导进行消融,而 249 例在 2014 年 4 月至 2018 年 11 月期间采用机器人引导进行消融。所有患者均接受 6 周的随访(超声、计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像)。

结果

机器人引导组的主要技术疗效明显高于手动引导组(88%对 76%;p = 0.013)。多因素逻辑回归分析表明,肿瘤体积小(≤3cm)和机器人引导是完全消融的主要有利预后因素。

结论

除了肿瘤体积小外,机器人导航也是主要的技术疗效的正预后因素。

相似文献

2
Robot-assisted microwave thermoablation of liver tumors: a single-center experience.
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2016 Feb;11(2):253-9. doi: 10.1007/s11548-015-1286-y. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
3
Evaluation of a robotic system for irreversible electroporation (IRE) of malignant liver tumors: initial results.
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017 May;12(5):803-809. doi: 10.1007/s11548-016-1485-1. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
5
Robotic versus Freehand Needle Positioning in CT-guided Ablation of Liver Tumors: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Radiology. 2019 Mar;290(3):826-832. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018181698. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
6
Electromagnetic Navigation System-Guided Microwave Ablation of Hepatic Tumors: A Matched Cohort Study.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021 Mar;44(3):500-506. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02761-6. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
8
Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Microwave Hepatic Ablation Near the Heart.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017 Apr;28(4):490-497. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.12.1216. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
10
Fate of necrotic volume after microwave ablation of multiple liver metastases.
Hepatogastroenterology. 2015 Jan-Feb;62(137):108-10.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgery or Percutaneous Ablation for Liver Tumors? The Key Points Are: When, Where, and How Large.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 16;17(8):1344. doi: 10.3390/cancers17081344.
2
Robotic navigation-assisted percutaneous liver puncture: a pilot study.
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Feb 1;15(2):1543-1554. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1584. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
4
5
Robotic Assistance in Percutaneous Liver Ablation Therapies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Ann Surg Open. 2024 Mar 26;5(2):e406. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Microwave ablation for hepatic malignancies: a systematic review of the technology and differences in devices.
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):817-834. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09567-2. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
9
Image-Guided Robotics for Standardized and Automated Biopsy and Ablation.
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2021 Nov 24;38(5):565-575. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1739164. eCollection 2021 Dec.
10
Stereotactic and Robotic Minimally Invasive Thermal Ablation of Malignant Liver Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 23;11:713685. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.713685. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
2
Robotic versus Freehand Needle Positioning in CT-guided Ablation of Liver Tumors: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Radiology. 2019 Mar;290(3):826-832. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018181698. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
3
1000 consecutive ablation sessions in the era of computer assisted image guidance - Lessons learned.
Eur J Radiol Open. 2018 Dec 5;6:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2018.11.002. eCollection 2019.
4
Robotic Insertion of Various Ablation Needles Under Computed Tomography Guidance: Accuracy in Animal Experiments.
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Aug;105:162-167. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
5
Microwave Ablation in the Management of Colorectal Cancer Pulmonary Metastases.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018 Oct;41(10):1530-1544. doi: 10.1007/s00270-018-2000-6. Epub 2018 May 29.
6
Stereotactically navigated percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) compared to conventional MWA: a matched pair analysis.
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018 Dec;13(12):1991-1997. doi: 10.1007/s11548-018-1778-7. Epub 2018 May 4.
9
Evaluation of a robotic system for irreversible electroporation (IRE) of malignant liver tumors: initial results.
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017 May;12(5):803-809. doi: 10.1007/s11548-016-1485-1. Epub 2016 Sep 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验