van Batenburg Aernoud A, van Oosterhout Matthijs F M, Knoppert Sebastiaan N, Kazemier Karin M, van der Vis Joanne J, Grutters Jan C, Goldschmeding Roel, van Moorsel Coline H M
Department of Pulmonology, St Antonius ILD Center of Excellence, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands.
Department of Pathology, DNA Pathology, St Antonius ILD Center of Excellence, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Sep 24;8:736485. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.736485. eCollection 2021.
Familial pulmonary fibrosis (FPF) is a monogenic disease most commonly involving telomere- () or surfactant- () related mutations. These mutations have been shown to alter lymphocytic inflammatory responses, and FPF biopsies with histological lymphocytic infiltrates have been reported. Recently, a model of a surfactant mutation in mice showed that the disease initially started with an inflammatory response followed by fibrogenesis. Since inflammation and fibrogenesis are targeted by different drugs, we investigated whether the degree of these two features co-localize or occur independently in different entities of FPF, and whether they influence survival. We quantified the number of lymphocyte aggregates per surface area, the extent of diffuse lymphocyte cell infiltrate, the number of fibroblast foci per surface area, and the percentage of fibrotic lung surface area in digitally scanned hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) sections of diagnostic surgical biopsies of patients with related FPF (TERT-PF; = 17), -related FPF (SFTP-PF; = 7), and sporadic idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (sIPF; = 10). For comparison, we included biopsies of patients with cellular non-specific interstitial pneumonia (cNSIP; = 10), an inflammatory interstitial lung disease with high lymphocyte influx and usually responsive to immunosuppressive therapy. The degree of inflammatory cell infiltrate and fibrosis in TERT-PF and SFTP-PF was not significantly different from that in sIPF. In comparison with cNSIP, the extent of lymphocyte infiltrates was significantly lower in sIPF and TERT-PF, but not in SFTP-PF. However, in contrast with cNSIP, in sIPF, TERT-PF, and SFTP-PF, diffuse lymphocyte cell infiltrates were predominantly present and lymphocyte aggregates were only present in fibrotic areas (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, fibroblast foci and percentage of fibrotic lung surface were associated with survival ( = 0.022 and = 0.018, respectively), while this association was not observed for lymphocyte aggregates or diffuse lymphocytic infiltration. Inflammatory cells in diagnostic lung biopsies of TERT-PF, SFTP-PF, and sIPF were largely confined to fibrotic areas. However, based on inflammation and fibrosis, no differences were found between FPF and sIPF, substantiating the histological similarities between monogenic familial and sporadic disease. Furthermore, the degree of fibrosis, rather than inflammation, correlates with survival, supporting that fibrogenesis is the key feature for therapeutic targeting of FPF.
家族性肺纤维化(FPF)是一种单基因疾病,最常见的是涉及端粒相关或表面活性剂相关的突变。这些突变已被证明会改变淋巴细胞炎症反应,并且有报道称FPF活检存在组织学淋巴细胞浸润。最近,小鼠表面活性剂突变模型表明,该疾病最初始于炎症反应,随后是纤维化形成。由于炎症和纤维化由不同药物靶向作用,我们研究了这两种特征的程度在不同实体的FPF中是共定位还是独立发生,以及它们是否影响生存。我们对相关FPF(TERT - PF;n = 17)、表面活性剂相关FPF(SFTP - PF;n = 7)和散发性特发性肺纤维化(sIPF;n = 10)患者诊断性手术活检的数字扫描苏木精和伊红(H&E)切片中每单位面积的淋巴细胞聚集数、弥漫性淋巴细胞浸润程度、每单位面积的成纤维细胞灶数以及纤维化肺表面积百分比进行了量化。为作比较,我们纳入了细胞性非特异性间质性肺炎(cNSIP;n = 10)患者的活检标本,这是一种炎症性间质性肺病,淋巴细胞大量流入且通常对免疫抑制治疗有反应。TERT - PF和SFTP - PF中的炎症细胞浸润程度和纤维化程度与sIPF中的无显著差异。与cNSIP相比,sIPF和TERT - PF中的淋巴细胞浸润程度显著较低,但SFTP - PF中并非如此。然而,与cNSIP不同,在sIPF、TERT - PF和SFTP - PF中,弥漫性淋巴细胞浸润主要存在,且淋巴细胞聚集仅存在于纤维化区域(p < 0.0001)。此外,成纤维细胞灶和纤维化肺表面积百分比与生存相关(分别为p = 0.022和p = 0.018),而淋巴细胞聚集或弥漫性淋巴细胞浸润则未观察到这种相关性。TERT - PF、SFTP - PF和sIPF诊断性肺活检中的炎症细胞主要局限于纤维化区域。然而,基于炎症和纤维化,在FPF和sIPF之间未发现差异,证实了单基因家族性疾病和散发性疾病之间的组织学相似性。此外,纤维化程度而非炎症程度与生存相关,支持纤维化形成是FPF治疗靶向的关键特征。