石油钻探行业的安全文化成熟度和韧性工程：国有企业与私营企业的对比研究。
Safety culture maturity and resilience engineering in an oil drilling industry: A comparison study among government-owned and private companies.
机构信息
Research Center for Health Science, Department of Occupational Health Engineering and Safety, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Student Research Committee, Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
出版信息
Work. 2021;70(2):443-453. doi: 10.3233/WOR-213583.
BACKGROUND
Organizational factors including a proper safety culture are among the important contributors of major accidents in process industriesOBJECTIVE: This study evaluates and compares the dimensions of safety culture maturity (SCM) and resilience engineering (RE) among 423 employees of government-owned drilling companies (GODC) and private drilling companies (PDC) located in Azar oilfield, Ilam province, southwest of Iran.
METHODS
The maturity of safety culture was measured using the modified version of Hudson safety culture maturity questionnaire and RE performance was studied using the resilience analysis gird (RAG). The relationship between RE and the SCM was discussed according to Hollnagel conceptual model.
RESULTS
The results showed that lowest and highest levels of SCM in all dimensions were observed in the pathological (11.75%) and reactive (28%) levels, respectively. However, high levels of SCM have not been established in any of the studied drilling companies. The status of SCM dimensions and levels as well as RE performance was better in PDC compared to GODC which is consistent with their safety performance lagging indicators.
CONCLUSION
This study showed that RE abilities could be improved by establishment of high levels of safety culture maturity.
背景
组织因素，包括适当的安全文化，是过程工业重大事故的重要因素之一。
目的
本研究评估并比较了伊朗西南部伊拉姆省阿扎尔油田 423 名政府钻井公司（GODC）和私营钻井公司（PDC）员工的安全文化成熟度（SCM）和韧性工程（RE）的维度。
方法
使用经过修改的 Hudson 安全文化成熟度问卷的修订版来衡量安全文化的成熟度，使用韧性分析网格（RAG）来研究 RE 性能。根据 Hollnagel 概念模型讨论了 RE 与 SCM 之间的关系。
结果
结果表明，在所有维度中，病理（11.75%）和反应（28%）水平的 SCM 水平最低和最高。然而，在所研究的钻井公司中，没有任何一家公司建立了高水平的 SCM。与 GODC 相比，PDC 的 SCM 维度和水平以及 RE 性能的状况更好，这与他们的安全绩效滞后指标一致。
结论
本研究表明，通过建立高水平的安全文化成熟度，可以提高 RE 能力。
Zotero 插件