Department of Cardiology, Center for Cardiac Arrest Prevention, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Health System, Advanced Health Sciences Pavilion, Suite A9220, 127 S. San Vicente Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2022 Mar;22(2):207-217. doi: 10.1007/s40256-021-00502-9. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
Data are needed on the use of oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in rural versus urban areas, including the initiation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).
We used Medicare data to examine rural/urban differences in anticoagulation use in patients with AF.
We identified incident AF in a 20% sample of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries (aged ≥ 65 years) from 2011 to 2016 and collected ZIP code and covariates at the time of AF. We identified the first anticoagulant prescription filled, if any, following AF diagnosis. We categorized beneficiaries into four rural/urban areas using rural-urban commuting area codes and used Poisson regression models to compare anticoagulant use.
We included 447,252 patients with AF (mean age 79 ± 8 years), of which 82% were urban, 9% large rural, 5% small rural, and 4% isolated. The percentage who initiated an anticoagulant rose from 34% in 2011 to 53% in 2016, paralleling the uptake of DOACs. In a multivariable-adjusted analysis, those in rural areas (vs. urban) were more likely to initiate an anticoagulant. However, rural beneficiaries (vs. urban) were less likely to initiate a DOAC; those in isolated areas were 17% less likely (95% confidence interval [CI] 13-20), those in small rural areas were 12% less likely (95% CI 9-15), and those in large rural areas were 10% less likely (95% CI 8-12).
Among Medicare beneficiaries with AF, anticoagulation use was low but increased over time with the introduction of DOACs. Rural beneficiaries were less likely to receive a DOAC.
需要了解农村和城市地区心房颤动(AF)患者的口服抗凝治疗数据,包括直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)的使用情况。
我们使用医疗保险数据检查 AF 患者中农村和城市地区抗凝治疗的差异。
我们在 2011 年至 2016 年期间,从按服务收费的医疗保险受益人的 20%样本中确定了新诊断的 AF,并在 AF 发生时收集了邮政编码和协变量。我们确定了在 AF 诊断后首次开出的抗凝药物处方。我们使用农村-城市通勤区代码将受益人分为四个农村/城市地区,并使用泊松回归模型比较抗凝治疗的使用情况。
我们纳入了 447,252 例 AF 患者(平均年龄 79±8 岁),其中 82%为城市,9%为大农村,5%为小农村,4%为孤立地区。开始抗凝治疗的比例从 2011 年的 34%上升到 2016 年的 53%,与 DOAC 的使用情况平行。在多变量调整分析中,农村地区(与城市地区相比)更有可能开始抗凝治疗。然而,农村地区的受益人与城市地区相比,开始使用 DOAC 的可能性较小;孤立地区的可能性低 17%(95%置信区间 [CI] 13-20),小农村地区低 12%(95% CI 9-15),大农村地区低 10%(95% CI 8-12)。
在医疗保险 AF 受益人群中,抗凝治疗的使用率较低,但随着 DOAC 的引入,抗凝治疗的使用率逐渐增加。农村地区的受益人与城市地区相比,更不可能接受 DOAC 治疗。