• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种族和性别与主要照顾者关系以及是否有资格接受心力衰竭先进治疗的关联。

Association of race and gender with primary caregiver relationships and eligibility for advanced heart failure therapies.

机构信息

Emory University, Division of Cardiology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Emory Transplant Center, Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2022 Jan;36(1):e14502. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14502. Epub 2021 Oct 26.

DOI:10.1111/ctr.14502
PMID:34634150
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8752502/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Caregiver support is considered necessary after heart transplant (HT) and left ventricular assist device (LVAD) for patients with end-stage heart failure (HF). Few studies have demonstrated how caregivers differ by gender and race, and whether that impacts therapy eligibility.

METHODS

We examined caregiver relationships among 674 patients (32% women, 55% Black) evaluated at Emory University from 2011 to 2017. Therapy readiness was assessed using the Stanford Integrated Assessment for Transplant (SIPAT). Evaluation outcome according to caregiver relationship was compared using χ analysis. Multivariable logistic regression determined the association between caregiver and eligibility according to gender and race.

RESULTS

Women and Black patients were less likely to have spouses as their support person (P < .001). Women were less likely to be considered eligible for advanced therapies (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] .64, 95% confidence interval [CI] .46-.89; P = .008), with Black women having lower eligibility than White women (aOR .28, 95% CI .11-.72; P = .008). Social support and SIPAT scores did not significantly influence eligibility by gender or race.

CONCLUSION

Lack of caregiver support is considered a relative contraindication to advanced therapies. Type of caregiver in our cohort varied according to race and gender but did not explain differences in eligibility for advanced therapies.

摘要

背景

对于终末期心力衰竭(HF)患者,心脏移植(HT)和左心室辅助装置(LVAD)后需要 caregiver 的支持。很少有研究表明 caregiver 如何因性别和种族而有所不同,以及这是否会影响治疗资格。

方法

我们检查了 2011 年至 2017 年期间在埃默里大学接受评估的 674 名患者(32%为女性,55%为黑人)的 caregiver 关系。使用斯坦福综合移植评估(SIPAT)评估治疗准备情况。使用 χ 检验比较根据 caregiver 关系的评估结果。多变量逻辑回归确定了 caregiver 与根据性别和种族的资格之间的关联。

结果

女性和黑人患者不太可能将配偶作为他们的支持人(P<.001)。女性不太可能被认为有资格接受先进的治疗(调整后的优势比[aOR].64,95%置信区间[CI].46-.89;P=.008),黑人女性比白人女性的资格更低(aOR.28,95%CI.11-.72;P=.008)。社会支持和 SIPAT 评分在性别或种族方面没有显著影响资格。

结论

缺乏 caregiver 的支持被认为是先进治疗的相对禁忌症。我们队列中 caregiver 的类型根据种族和性别而有所不同,但不能解释先进治疗资格的差异。

相似文献

1
Association of race and gender with primary caregiver relationships and eligibility for advanced heart failure therapies.种族和性别与主要照顾者关系以及是否有资格接受心力衰竭先进治疗的关联。
Clin Transplant. 2022 Jan;36(1):e14502. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14502. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
2
Sex differences in eligibility for advanced heart failure therapies.心力衰竭治疗中性别差异的资格评估。
Clin Transplant. 2020 May;34(5):e13839. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13839. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
3
Disparities by Sex, Race, and Ethnicity in Use of Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Heart Transplants Among Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.心力衰竭伴射血分数降低患者中左心室辅助装置和心脏移植在性别、种族和民族方面的差异。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jan 16;13(2):e031021. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031021. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
4
Disparities and Impact of Medicaid Expansion on Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation and Outcomes.医疗补助扩大对左心室辅助装置植入及预后的差异与影响
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Jun;13(6):e006284. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006284. Epub 2020 May 12.
5
Impact of insurance type on eligibility for advanced heart failure therapies and survival.保险类型对心力衰竭晚期治疗和生存率的影响。
Clin Transplant. 2018 Aug;32(8):e13328. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13328. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
6
Caregiver Health-Related Quality of Life, Burden, and Patient Outcomes in Ambulatory Advanced Heart Failure: A Report From REVIVAL.门诊晚期心力衰竭患者的照护者健康相关生活质量、负担和患者结局:REVIVAL 研究报告。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jul 20;10(14):e019901. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019901. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
7
Association of Gender and Race With Allocation of Advanced Heart Failure Therapies.性别和种族与心力衰竭先进疗法的分配关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2011044. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11044.
8
High early event rates in patients with questionable eligibility for advanced heart failure therapies: Results from the Medical Arm of Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (Medamacs) Registry.晚期心力衰竭治疗资格存疑患者的早期事件发生率较高:机械辅助循环支持医学分支登记研究(Medamacs登记研究)的结果
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016 Jun;35(6):722-30. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.01.014. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
9
Disparities in Practice Patterns by Sex, Race, and Ethnicity in Patients Referred for Advanced Heart Failure Therapies.性别、种族和民族差异对接受晚期心力衰竭治疗患者的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2022 Dec 15;185:46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.09.015. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
10
Caregivers of Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Possible Impacts on Patients' Mortality and Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support-Defined Morbidity Events.左心室辅助装置患者的护理人员:对患者死亡率及机械辅助循环支持定义的机构间注册处发病率事件的可能影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Jan;10(1). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.002879.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychosocial Risk and Recurrent Hospitalizations in Women and Men Following LVAD Implantation: A Multi-State Analysis of the INTERMACS Registry.左心室辅助装置植入术后男女患者的心理社会风险与再次住院情况:来自INTERMACS注册研究的多状态分析
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 May 22;12(6):198. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12060198.
2
Studying gender in the experiences of patients with heart failure: A scoping review of qualitative studies and methodological recommendations.心力衰竭患者经历中的性别研究:定性研究的范围综述及方法学建议
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057241305078. doi: 10.1177/17455057241305078.
3
Sex and Gender-related Disparities in Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in Heart Transplantation.心脏移植中与性别相关的临床特征和结局的性别差异。
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2024 Aug;21(4):367-378. doi: 10.1007/s11897-024-00670-0. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
4
Disparities by Sex, Race, and Ethnicity in Use of Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Heart Transplants Among Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.心力衰竭伴射血分数降低患者中左心室辅助装置和心脏移植在性别、种族和民族方面的差异。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jan 16;13(2):e031021. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031021. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
5
Disparities in Adult Patient Selection for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the United States: A Population-Level Study.美国体外膜肺氧合成人患者选择的差异:一项基于人群的研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023 Aug;20(8):1166-1174. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202212-1029OC.
6
Racial and ethnic disparities in psychosocial evaluation and liver transplant waitlisting.心理社会评估和肝移植候补名单中的种族和民族差异。
Am J Transplant. 2023 Jun;23(6):776-785. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.01.011. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
7
The Impact of Health Care Disparities on Patients With Heart Failure.医疗保健差距对心力衰竭患者的影响。
J Card Fail. 2022 Jul;28(7):1169-1184. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.04.008. Epub 2022 May 17.
8
Sex Differences in Recovery and Device Replacement After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation as Destination Therapy.作为心脏移植的终末期治疗,左心室辅助装置植入术后的恢复和设备更换存在性别差异。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Mar;11(5):e023294. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023294. Epub 2022 Feb 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Race- and Sex-Specific Population Attributable Fractions of Incident Heart Failure: A Population-Based Cohort Study From the Lifetime Risk Pooling Project.新发心力衰竭的种族和性别特异性人群归因分数:一项基于人群的队列研究,来自终生风险汇总项目。
Circ Heart Fail. 2021 Apr;14(4):e008113. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.008113. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
2
Association of Gender and Race With Allocation of Advanced Heart Failure Therapies.性别和种族与心力衰竭先进疗法的分配关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2011044. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11044.
3
Sex differences in eligibility for advanced heart failure therapies.心力衰竭治疗中性别差异的资格评估。
Clin Transplant. 2020 May;34(5):e13839. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13839. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
4
OPTN/SRTR 2018 Annual Data Report: Heart.OPTN/SRTR 2018 年度数据报告:心脏。
Am J Transplant. 2020 Jan;20 Suppl s1:340-426. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15676.
5
Sex differences in heart failure.心力衰竭中的性别差异。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Dec 14;40(47):3859-3868c. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz835.
6
Does Race Influence Decision Making for Advanced Heart Failure Therapies?种族会影响晚期心力衰竭治疗决策吗?
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Nov 19;8(22):e013592. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013592. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
7
Sex-Based Differences in Left Ventricular Assist Device Utilization: Insights From the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2004 to 2016.基于性别的左心室辅助装置使用差异:来自 2004 年至 2016 年全国住院患者样本的见解。
Circ Heart Fail. 2019 Sep;12(9):e006082. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006082. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
8
Psychosocial Evaluation of Candidates for Heart Transplant and Ventricular Assist Devices: Beyond the Current Consensus.心脏移植和心室辅助装置候选者的心理社会评估:超越当前共识。
Circ Heart Fail. 2019 Jul;12(7):e006058. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006058. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
9
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2019年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2019 Mar 5;139(10):e56-e528. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659.
10
Standardized Psychosocial Assessment Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.在植入左心室辅助装置之前进行标准化的心理社会评估。
Circ Heart Fail. 2019 Jan;12(1):e005377. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.118.005377.