University of Oklahoma, United States; Center for Applied Social Research, United States.
University of Oklahoma, United States; National Center for Risk and Resiliency, United States; Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Conscious Cogn. 2021 Oct;95:103215. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2021.103215. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
Theoretically, attitudes about freedom and punishment can shape people's decisions and cause pernicious disagreements (e.g., political policies). Several scales measure free will beliefs, partially to help understand disagreements about theoretical and practical issues. We contribute to these efforts by directly comparing existing measures and by introducing a short measure of free will related attitudes. Studies 1, 2, and 3 (Ns = 221, 225, 244) factor analyzed all items in existing scales of free will and moral responsibility, resulting in two prominent factors: Beliefs in Free Will and Beliefs in Punishment. Study 4 (N = 269) presents evidence for the 2-factor structure from a nationally representative sample. Study 5 (N = 108) gives evidence of the utility of the Free Will and Punishment scale in predicting free will relevant beliefs and attitudes. As such, the Free Will and Punishment scale is likely useful when longer instruments are not practically possible.
从理论上讲,人们对自由和惩罚的态度可以影响他们的决策,并导致有害的分歧(例如,政治政策)。有几个量表可以衡量自由意志信念,部分是为了帮助理解关于理论和实践问题的分歧。我们通过直接比较现有量表并引入一个简短的自由意志相关态度量表来为这些努力做出贡献。研究 1、2 和 3(N=221、225、244)对自由意志和道德责任现有量表中的所有项目进行了因素分析,得出了两个主要因素:自由意志信念和惩罚信念。研究 4(N=269)从全国代表性样本中提供了 2 因素结构的证据。研究 5(N=108)证明了自由意志和惩罚量表在预测与自由意志相关的信念和态度方面的效用。因此,当无法实际使用较长的量表时,自由意志和惩罚量表可能很有用。