• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于机器学习的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇浓度估算。

Estimation of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Concentration Using Machine Learning.

机构信息

Ankara University Stem Cell Institute, Interdisciplinary Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Biochemistry, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Lab Med. 2022 Mar 7;53(2):161-171. doi: 10.1093/labmed/lmab065.

DOI:10.1093/labmed/lmab065
PMID:34635916
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) can be estimated using the Friedewald and Martin-Hopkins formulas. We developed LDL-C prediction models using multiple machine learning methods and investigated the validity of the new models along with the former formulas.

METHODS

Laboratory data (n = 59,415) on measured LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides (TG), and total cholesterol were partitioned into training and test data sets. Linear regression, gradient-boosted trees, and artificial neural network (ANN) models were formed based on the training data. Paired-group comparisons were performed using a t-test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. We considered P values <.001 with an effect size >.2 to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

For TG ≥177 mg/dL, the Friedewald formula underestimated and the Martin-Hopkins formula overestimated the LDL-C (P <.001), which was more significant for LDL-C <70 mg/dL. The linear regression, gradient-boosted trees, and ANN models outperformed the aforementioned formulas for TG ≥177 mg/dL and LDL-C <70 mg/dL based on a comparison with a homogeneous assay (P >.001 vs. P <.001) and classification accuracy.

CONCLUSION

Linear regression, gradient-boosted trees, and ANN models offer more accurate alternatives to the aforementioned formulas, especially for TG 177 to 399 mg/dL and LDL-C <70 mg/dL.

摘要

目的

可以使用 Friedewald 和 Martin-Hopkins 公式估算低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)。我们使用多种机器学习方法开发了 LDL-C 预测模型,并研究了新模型与旧公式的有效性。

方法

将实验室数据(n=59415)中关于实测 LDL-C、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、甘油三酯(TG)和总胆固醇的数据分为训练数据集和测试数据集。基于训练数据形成线性回归、梯度提升树和人工神经网络(ANN)模型。使用 t 检验和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验进行配对组比较。我们认为 P 值<.001 且效应量>.2 具有统计学意义。

结果

对于 TG≥177mg/dL,Friedewald 公式低估了 LDL-C,而 Martin-Hopkins 公式高估了 LDL-C(P<.001),对于 LDL-C<70mg/dL 更为显著。基于与均相测定法的比较,线性回归、梯度提升树和 ANN 模型在 TG≥177mg/dL 和 LDL-C<70mg/dL 时优于上述公式(P>.001 与 P<.001),并且分类准确性更高。

结论

线性回归、梯度提升树和 ANN 模型为上述公式提供了更准确的替代方案,特别是对于 TG 为 177 至 399mg/dL 和 LDL-C<70mg/dL。

相似文献

1
Estimation of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Concentration Using Machine Learning.基于机器学习的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇浓度估算。
Lab Med. 2022 Mar 7;53(2):161-171. doi: 10.1093/labmed/lmab065.
2
Comparison of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Assessment by Martin/Hopkins Estimation, Friedewald Estimation, and Preparative Ultracentrifugation: Insights From the FOURIER Trial.马丁/霍普金斯估计、弗里德瓦尔德估计和制备超速离心法评估低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的比较: FOURIER 试验的见解。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Aug 1;3(8):749-753. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1533.
3
Estimation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels using machine learning.基于机器学习的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平估算。
Int J Cardiol. 2022 Apr 1;352:144-149. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.01.029. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
4
Comparison of Methods to Estimate Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Patients With High Triglyceride Levels.比较高甘油三酯血症患者估算低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的方法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2128817. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28817.
5
Comparing a novel machine learning method to the Friedewald formula and Martin-Hopkins equation for low-density lipoprotein estimation.比较一种新的机器学习方法与 Friedewald 公式和 Martin-Hopkins 方程在估计低密度脂蛋白方面的表现。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 30;15(9):e0239934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239934. eCollection 2020.
6
Non-HDL-C/TG ratio indicates significant underestimation of calculated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) better than TG level: a study on the reliability of mathematical formulas used for LDL-C estimation.非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇/甘油三酯比值比甘油三酯水平更能显著低估计算得出的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C):用于 LDL-C 估算的数学公式可靠性研究。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Dec 24;59(5):857-867. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-1366. Print 2021 Apr 27.
7
Validation of Friedewald, Martin-Hopkins and Sampson low-density lipoprotein cholesterol equations.验证 Friedewald、Martin-Hopkins 和 Sampson 低密度脂蛋白胆固醇方程。
PLoS One. 2022 May 13;17(5):e0263860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263860. eCollection 2022.
8
Machine Learning Estimation of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Women With and Without HIV.机器学习估计有和无 HIV 的女性的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2022 Mar 1;89(3):318-323. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002869.
9
Comparison of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level calculated using the modified Martin/Hopkins estimation or the Friedewald formula with direct homogeneous assay measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.使用改良的Martin/Hopkins估算方法或Friedewald公式计算的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平与直接匀相测定法测得的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平的比较。
Arch Med Sci. 2020 Aug 3;18(3):577-586. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2020.97847. eCollection 2022.
10
Validation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol equations in pediatric population.验证低密度脂蛋白胆固醇方程在儿科人群中的适用性。
PeerJ. 2023 Jan 5;11:e14544. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14544. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating New Technologies in Lipidology: A Comprehensive Review.脂质学中新技术的整合:全面综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 14;14(14):4984. doi: 10.3390/jcm14144984.
2
Regulating the future of laboratory medicine: European regulatory landscape of AI-driven medical device software in laboratory medicine.规范检验医学的未来:欧洲检验医学中人工智能驱动的医疗设备软件监管格局
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2025-0482.
3
Machine learning-based prediction of LDL cholesterol: performance evaluation and validation.基于机器学习的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇预测:性能评估与验证
PeerJ. 2025 Apr 9;13:e19248. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19248. eCollection 2025.