Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.
Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), Division of Cardiac Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.
Laryngoscope. 2022 Jul;132(7):1381-1387. doi: 10.1002/lary.29903. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: Utilization of flaps for reconstruction of large head and neck cancer (HNCA) defects has become more prevalent. The present study aimed to assess the impact of center experience as measured by annual hospital caseload on mortality, major complications, resource utilization, and 90-day readmissions following HNCA resection with flap reconstruction.
Non-Randomized Controlled Cohort Study.
All adult patients undergoing elective HNCA resection with flap reconstruction were identified utilizing the 2010 to 2018 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Hospitals were subsequently classified as low-, medium-, or high-volume based on annual institutional surgical caseload tertiles. Multivariable regression models were implemented to assess the independent association of hospital volume with the outcomes of interest.
Over the nine-year study period, the proportion of HNCA resection with flap reconstruction gradually increased (12.8% in 2010 vs. 17.3% in 2018, P < .001). Although increasing hospital volume did not alter the odds of mortality, patients treated at high-volume centers were less likely to experience both surgical (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.97, P = .025) and medical complications (AOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.57-0.85, P < .001). Furthermore, these patients had shorter hospitalizations (-2.1 days, 95% CI -2.7 to -1.4 days, P < .001) and decreased costs (-$8,100, 95% CI -11,400 to -4,700, P < .001) compared to counterparts at low-volume centers. However, hospital volume did not impact 90-day readmissions.
Patients undergoing HNCA resection with flap reconstruction at high-volume centers were less likely to experience surgical and medical complications while incurring shorter hospitalizations and lower costs. Implementation of volume standards may be appropriate to improve outcomes in this surgical population.
3 Laryngoscope, 132:1381-1387, 2022.
目的/假设:皮瓣在头颈部癌症(HNCA)大缺损重建中的应用已越来越普遍。本研究旨在评估以每年医院病例量衡量的中心经验对 HNCA 切除后皮瓣重建的死亡率、主要并发症、资源利用和 90 天再入院的影响。
非随机对照队列研究。
利用 2010 年至 2018 年全国再入院数据库,确定所有接受择期 HNCA 切除术和皮瓣重建的成年患者。随后根据医院年度机构手术病例量的三分位数将医院分类为低、中、高容量。实施多变量回归模型以评估医院容量与感兴趣结局的独立关联。
在九年的研究期间,HNCA 切除术和皮瓣重建的比例逐渐增加(2010 年为 12.8%,2018 年为 17.3%,P < .001)。尽管增加医院容量并未改变死亡率的几率,但在高容量中心治疗的患者发生手术(调整后的优势比 [AOR] 0.81,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.67-0.97,P = .025)和医疗并发症(AOR 0.70,95%CI 0.57-0.85,P < .001)的可能性较低。此外,这些患者的住院时间较短(-2.1 天,95%CI -2.7 至 -1.4 天,P < .001),且费用降低(-$8100,95%CI -11400 至 -4700,P < .001),与低容量中心的患者相比。然而,医院容量并未影响 90 天再入院率。
在高容量中心接受 HNCA 切除术和皮瓣重建的患者发生手术和医疗并发症的可能性较低,而住院时间和费用较低。实施容量标准可能有助于改善该手术人群的结局。
3 级喉镜,132:1381-1387,2022 年。