• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理、社会和认知资源与穷人的心理健康。

Psychological, social and cognitive resources and the mental wellbeing of the poor.

机构信息

School of Economics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

ARC Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course, School of Economics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Oct 12;16(10):e0258417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258417. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0258417
PMID:34637477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8509876/
Abstract

Our study takes advantage of unique data to quantify deficits in the psychosocial and cognitive resources of an extremely vulnerable subpopulation-those experiencing housing vulnerability-in an advanced, high-income country (Australia). Groups such as these are often impossible to study using nationally representative data sources because they make up a small share of the overall population. We show that those experiencing housing vulnerability sleep less well, have more limited cognitive functioning, and less social capital than do those in the general population. They are also less emotionally stable, less conscientious, more external, and more risk tolerant. Collectively, these deficits in psychosocial and cognitive resources account for between 24-42% of their reduced life satisfaction and their increased mental distress and loneliness. These traits also account for a large proportion of the gap in mental wellbeing across different levels of housing vulnerability.

摘要

我们的研究利用独特的数据,量化了在一个先进的高收入国家(澳大利亚)中,那些住房脆弱的极度弱势群体在社会心理和认知资源方面的不足。这些群体通常无法通过具有代表性的全国性数据来源进行研究,因为他们在总人口中所占比例较小。研究表明,与普通人群相比,住房脆弱的人睡眠质量更差,认知功能更有限,社会资本更少。他们也不那么情绪稳定、认真、外向和风险承受能力更强。总的来说,这些社会心理和认知资源的不足,导致他们的生活满意度降低了 24%至 42%,精神困扰和孤独感增加。这些特征也解释了不同住房脆弱程度之间心理健康差距的很大一部分原因。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5135/8509876/3092da446ce3/pone.0258417.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5135/8509876/e46aea8b8395/pone.0258417.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5135/8509876/26b75a4eca11/pone.0258417.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5135/8509876/3dea4cbbe45d/pone.0258417.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5135/8509876/cc2e91f6601d/pone.0258417.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5135/8509876/3092da446ce3/pone.0258417.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5135/8509876/e46aea8b8395/pone.0258417.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5135/8509876/26b75a4eca11/pone.0258417.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5135/8509876/3dea4cbbe45d/pone.0258417.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5135/8509876/cc2e91f6601d/pone.0258417.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5135/8509876/3092da446ce3/pone.0258417.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychological, social and cognitive resources and the mental wellbeing of the poor.心理、社会和认知资源与穷人的心理健康。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 12;16(10):e0258417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258417. eCollection 2021.
2
Peer-to-peer support model to improve quality of life among highly vulnerable, low-income older adults in Cape Town, South Africa.南非开普敦,一个针对高度脆弱、低收入老年群体的同侪支持模式,以改善他们的生活质量。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Oct 22;19(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1310-0.
3
One-year reciprocal relationship between community participation and mental wellbeing in Australia: a panel analysis.澳大利亚社区参与和心理健康之间一年的互惠关系:面板分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Mar;128:246-54. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.022. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
4
Quality not quantity: loneliness subtypes, psychological trauma, and mental health in the US adult population.质重于量:美国成年人群体中的孤独亚型、心理创伤和心理健康。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019 Sep;54(9):1089-1099. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1597-8. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
5
Cognitive ability as a moderator of the association between social disadvantage and psychological distress: evidence from a population-based sample.认知能力作为社会劣势与心理困扰之间关联的调节因素:来自基于人群样本的证据。
Psychol Med. 2019 Jul;49(9):1545-1554. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718002118. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
6
Social capital dynamics and health in mid to later life: findings from Australia.社会资本动态与中老年健康:来自澳大利亚的研究结果。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1277-1282. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1655-9. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
7
Belonging and Inclusivity Make a Resilient Future for All: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Post-Flood Social Capital in a Diverse Australian Rural Community.归属感和包容性成就所有人的韧性未来:多元澳大利亚农村社区洪灾后社会资本的横断面分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 21;17(20):7676. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207676.
8
Neighborhood, social isolation and mental health outcome among older people in Ghana.加纳老年人的邻里关系、社会孤立与心理健康结局。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Dec 1;259:154-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.08.024. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
9
"We Are Staying at Home." Association of Self-perceptions of Aging, Personal and Family Resources, and Loneliness With Psychological Distress During the Lock-Down Period of COVID-19.“我们待在家里。”自我老龄化认知、个人和家庭资源与新冠疫情封锁期间孤独感与心理困扰的关联。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Jan 18;76(2):e10-e16. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa048.
10
The association between social capital and loneliness in different age groups: a population-based study in Western Finland.不同年龄组中社会资本与孤独感之间的关联:芬兰西部的一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 11;16:542. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3248-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship between social determinants of health and cognitive performance in an older American population: a cross-sectional NHANES study.美国老年人群健康的社会决定因素与认知表现之间的关系:一项横断面美国国家健康与营养检查调查研究
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jan 10;25(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05672-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Are Risk Preferences Stable?风险偏好是稳定的吗?
J Econ Perspect. 2018;32(2):135-54.
2
Decisions in poverty contexts.贫困语境下的决策。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Dec;18:131-136. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.026. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
3
Can having internal locus of control insure against negative shocks? Psychological evidence from panel data.拥有内控点能抵御负面冲击吗?来自面板数据的心理学证据。
J Econ Behav Organ. 2016 Feb;122:88-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.11.014. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
4
Childhood forecasting of a small segment of the population with large economic burden.一小部分人口的童年预测带来了巨大的经济负担。
Nat Hum Behav. 2016;1. doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0005. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
5
Housing Insecurity and the Association With Health Outcomes and Unhealthy Behaviors, Washington State, 2011.2011年华盛顿州住房不安全状况及其与健康结果和不健康行为的关联
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Jul 9;12:E109. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.140511.
6
Loneliness, social relations and health and well-being in deprived communities.贫困社区中的孤独、社会关系与健康福祉
Psychol Health Med. 2015;20(3):332-44. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2014.940354. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
7
On the psychology of poverty.论贫困的心理学。
Science. 2014 May 23;344(6186):862-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1232491.
8
Sleep and quality of life in urban poverty: the effect of a slum housing upgrading program.城市贫困与生活质量:贫民窟住房升级计划的影响。
Sleep. 2013 Nov 1;36(11):1669-76. doi: 10.5665/sleep.3124.
9
Poverty impedes cognitive function.贫困阻碍认知功能。
Science. 2013 Aug 30;341(6149):976-80. doi: 10.1126/science.1238041.
10
On estimating probability of presence from use-availability or presence-background data.从使用可得性或存在背景数据估计存在概率。
Ecology. 2013 Jun;94(6):1409-19. doi: 10.1890/12-1520.1.