Division of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2022 Jan;63(1):38-46. doi: 10.1111/vru.13024. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
Dynamic contrast CT with Patlak plot analysis can be used to determine the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). However, several studies have shown different GFR values and they are most likely less than the values by the standard techniques. The purpose of this prospective, experimental, and method comparison study was to evaluate the GFR using a CT technique (CT-GFR) in 12 healthy dogs compared to serum iohexol clearance (SIC-GFR). All dogs were anesthetized and placed in the right lateral recumbency position and the caudal part was lifted inside the CT gantry. A single-slice dynamic CT of the aorta and both kidneys was scanned sequentially every 2 s for 2 min after a bolus injection (3 mL/s) of iohexol (300 mg/kg). Time attenuation curves (TAC) were constructed and the GFR per volume of kidney was calculated using the Patlak plot analysis method based on 30-120 s time intervals, and results were compared to global GFR from SIC that was determined with eight blood samples for up to 240 min. The CT-GFR value (1.85 ± 0.48 mL/min/kg) was significantly less than the SIC-GFR value (3.40 ± 0.80 mL/min/kg; P < .05). The CT-GFR was correlated with SIC-GFR by the coefficient of correlation (r) at 0.61 (P = .046). In conclusion, the CT-GFR underestimated SIC-GFR and should be used carefully. We suggest that the GFR should be calculated using the equation derived from linear regression between CT-GFR and the standard GFR method. With its own particular parameters, each institute should have its own prediction equation.
动态对比 CT 与 Patlak 图分析可用于确定肾小球滤过率 (GFR)。然而,多项研究表明,GFR 值存在差异,且很可能低于标准技术的测量值。本前瞻性、实验性、方法比较研究的目的是使用 CT 技术(CT-GFR)评估 12 只健康犬的 GFR,并与血清碘海醇清除率(SIC-GFR)进行比较。所有犬麻醉后侧卧,尾侧抬起置于 CT 扫描架内。经静脉团注碘海醇(300 mg/kg,3 mL/s)后,2 s 连续扫描主动脉和双侧肾脏单次 CT 动态扫描,持续 2 min。构建时间衰减曲线(TAC),采用 Patlak 图分析方法,在 30-120 s 时间间隔内计算单位肾脏体积的 GFR,结果与 240 min 内采集 8 份血样的 SIC 确定的整体 GFR 进行比较。CT-GFR 值(1.85 ± 0.48 mL/min/kg)明显低于 SIC-GFR 值(3.40 ± 0.80 mL/min/kg;P <.05)。CT-GFR 与 SIC-GFR 之间的相关系数(r)为 0.61(P =.046)。总之,CT-GFR 低估了 SIC-GFR,应谨慎使用。我们建议使用 CT-GFR 与标准 GFR 方法之间线性回归得出的方程计算 GFR。各机构应根据自身特定参数制定各自的预测方程。