Tumor Biology Center, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Section of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Jan;31(1):e13522. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13522. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
The goal of this study was to investigate barriers to utilisation of cancer rehabilitation by querying a large sample of various professionals in health care with a comprehensive set of barriers.
We developed a questionnaire comprising 55 barriers to utilisation of cancer rehabilitation and administered it to four different types of medical, care and social work experts involved in the referral to cancer rehabilitation. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted and the extracted factors were ranked by mean values. Additionally, ANOVAs were calculated to test for group differences.
Our sample (N = 606) consisted of 249 physicians, 194 social workers, 105 nurses and 55 psychologists in Germany. We identified seven barrier-dimensions: low appreciation of rehabilitation by professionals, insufficient coordination, insufficient application procedure, rehabilitation requirements not met, patients' unfulfilled demands, patients' social responsibilities and patients' coping style, with the latter being rated as the most obstructive thereof. Furthermore, we found statistically significant group differences for six of these factors with small- to medium-sized effects.
Our results support previous publications implicating the patients' coping style as a barrier. We furthermore found evidence for barriers relating to processes and organisational issues, thereby expanding on the scope of patient-oriented publications. Suggestions for improving patients' health services accessibility are made.
本研究旨在通过向参与癌症康复转介的四类医疗、护理和社会工作专家询问一整套障碍因素,调查癌症康复利用的障碍。
我们开发了一个包含 55 个癌症康复利用障碍的问卷,并将其分发给德国的 249 名医生、194 名社工、105 名护士和 55 名心理学家。我们进行了探索性因素分析,并根据平均值对提取的因素进行了排序。此外,还计算了方差分析来检验组间差异。
我们的样本(N=606)包括 249 名医生、194 名社工、105 名护士和 55 名心理学家。我们确定了七个障碍维度:专业人员对康复的认识不足、协调不足、应用程序不足、康复需求未得到满足、患者未得到满足的需求、患者的社会责任感和患者的应对方式,其中后者被评为最具障碍性的因素。此外,我们发现其中六个因素存在统计学上显著的组间差异,其效应大小为小到中等。
我们的研究结果支持先前的研究,表明患者的应对方式是一种障碍。我们还发现了与流程和组织问题相关的障碍证据,从而扩展了以患者为导向的出版物的范围。提出了改善患者卫生服务可及性的建议。