• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

铝合金EN AW-5083等离子射流切割中切割质量响应的建模与优化

Modeling and Optimization of Cut Quality Responses in Plasma Jet Cutting of Aluminium Alloy EN AW-5083.

作者信息

Peko Ivan, Marić Dejan, Nedić Bogdan, Samardžić Ivan

机构信息

Magna Steyr, Liebenauer Hauptstraße 317, 8041 Graz, Austria.

Mechanical Engineering Faculty in Slavonski Brod, University in Slavonski Brod, Trg Ivane Brlić Mažuranić 2, 35000 Slavonski Brod, Croatia.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2021 Sep 25;14(19):5559. doi: 10.3390/ma14195559.

DOI:10.3390/ma14195559
PMID:34639956
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8509729/
Abstract

The plasma jet cutting process has a high potential for the machining of aluminium and its alloys. Aluminium is well known as a highly thermally conductive and sensitive material, and because of that there exist uncertainties in defining process parameters values that lead to the best possible cut quality characteristics. Due to that, comprehensive analysis of process responses as well as defining optimal cutting conditions is necessary. In this study, the effects of three main process parameters-cutting speed, arc current, and cutting height-on the cut quality responses: top kerf width, bevel angle, surface roughness , , and material removal rate were analyzed. Experimentations were conducted on aluminium EN AW-5083. In order to model relations between input parameters and process responses and to conduct their optimization, a novel hybrid approach of response surface methodology (RSM) combined with desirability analysis was presented. Prediction accuracy of developed responses regression models was proved by comparison between experimental and predicted data. Significance of process parameters and their interactions was checked by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Desirability analysis was found as an effective way to conduct multi-response optimization and to define optimal cutting area. Due to its simplicity, the novel presented approach was demonstrated as a useful tool to predict and optimize cut quality responses in plasma jet cutting process of aluminium alloy.

摘要

等离子射流切割工艺在铝合金加工方面具有很大潜力。铝是一种众所周知的高导热且敏感的材料,正因如此,在确定能带来最佳切割质量特性的工艺参数值时存在不确定性。因此,有必要对工艺响应进行全面分析并确定最佳切割条件。在本研究中,分析了切割速度、电弧电流和切割高度这三个主要工艺参数对切割质量响应(顶切口宽度、斜角、表面粗糙度以及材料去除率)的影响。实验是在EN AW - 5083铝合金上进行的。为了建立输入参数与工艺响应之间的关系模型并进行优化,提出了一种将响应面方法(RSM)与期望度分析相结合的新型混合方法。通过实验数据与预测数据的比较,证明了所建立的响应回归模型的预测准确性。通过方差分析(ANOVA)检验了工艺参数及其相互作用的显著性。期望度分析被发现是进行多响应优化和确定最佳切割区域的有效方法。由于其简单性,所提出的新方法被证明是预测和优化铝合金等离子射流切割工艺中切割质量响应的有用工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/6c254aee5f94/materials-14-05559-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/5c8f519cfaaa/materials-14-05559-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/7a83a264a8dd/materials-14-05559-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/03a5269ba55c/materials-14-05559-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/fa95321cb80f/materials-14-05559-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/f50acb5ebead/materials-14-05559-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/c3671a7f5e0b/materials-14-05559-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/79aec0be26a2/materials-14-05559-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/505b43bf6c7b/materials-14-05559-g008a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/765734c0f42f/materials-14-05559-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/cb1bb0fcc75a/materials-14-05559-g010a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/a1ee0ca04407/materials-14-05559-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/d5defd8c47ac/materials-14-05559-g012a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/307efbb1e358/materials-14-05559-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/29ec32c9ffbe/materials-14-05559-g014a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/31dc41214bb1/materials-14-05559-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/964af07d8b40/materials-14-05559-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/1165d1357513/materials-14-05559-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/6c254aee5f94/materials-14-05559-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/5c8f519cfaaa/materials-14-05559-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/7a83a264a8dd/materials-14-05559-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/03a5269ba55c/materials-14-05559-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/fa95321cb80f/materials-14-05559-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/f50acb5ebead/materials-14-05559-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/c3671a7f5e0b/materials-14-05559-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/79aec0be26a2/materials-14-05559-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/505b43bf6c7b/materials-14-05559-g008a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/765734c0f42f/materials-14-05559-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/cb1bb0fcc75a/materials-14-05559-g010a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/a1ee0ca04407/materials-14-05559-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/d5defd8c47ac/materials-14-05559-g012a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/307efbb1e358/materials-14-05559-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/29ec32c9ffbe/materials-14-05559-g014a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/31dc41214bb1/materials-14-05559-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/964af07d8b40/materials-14-05559-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/1165d1357513/materials-14-05559-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b38/8509729/6c254aee5f94/materials-14-05559-g018.jpg

相似文献

1
Modeling and Optimization of Cut Quality Responses in Plasma Jet Cutting of Aluminium Alloy EN AW-5083.铝合金EN AW-5083等离子射流切割中切割质量响应的建模与优化
Materials (Basel). 2021 Sep 25;14(19):5559. doi: 10.3390/ma14195559.
2
Temperature Optimization by Using Response Surface Methodology and Desirability Analysis of Aluminium 6061.采用响应面法和期望函数法对6061铝合金进行温度优化
Materials (Basel). 2022 Aug 26;15(17):5892. doi: 10.3390/ma15175892.
3
Modelling the Kerf Angle, Roughness and Waviness of the Surface of Inconel 718 in an Abrasive Water Jet Cutting Process.模拟Inconel 718合金在磨料水射流切割过程中表面的切口角度、粗糙度和波纹度。
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jul 27;16(15):5288. doi: 10.3390/ma16155288.
4
Prediction and Analysis of Multi-Response Characteristics on Plasma Arc Cutting of Monel 400™ Alloy Using Mamdani-Fuzzy Logic System and Sensitivity Analysis.基于Mamdani模糊逻辑系统和敏感性分析的蒙乃尔400™合金等离子弧切割多响应特性预测与分析
Materials (Basel). 2020 Aug 12;13(16):3558. doi: 10.3390/ma13163558.
5
The Effect of Abrasive Waterjet Machining Parameters on the Condition of Al-Si Alloy.磨料水射流加工参数对铝硅合金状态的影响
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jul 13;13(14):3122. doi: 10.3390/ma13143122.
6
Multi-Response Optimization in High-Speed Machining of Ti-6Al-4V Using TOPSIS-Fuzzy Integrated Approach.基于TOPSIS-模糊集成方法的Ti-6Al-4V高速加工多响应优化
Materials (Basel). 2020 Mar 2;13(5):1104. doi: 10.3390/ma13051104.
7
Modeling of Cutting Parameters and Tool Geometry for Multi-Criteria Optimization of Surface Roughness and Vibration via Response Surface Methodology in Turning of AISI 5140 Steel.通过响应面法对AISI 5140钢车削加工中的表面粗糙度和振动进行多准则优化的切削参数和刀具几何形状建模
Materials (Basel). 2020 Sep 23;13(19):4242. doi: 10.3390/ma13194242.
8
Surface Roughness Evaluation in Thin EN AW-6086-T6 Alloy Plates after Face Milling Process with Different Strategies.不同铣削策略对面铣加工后的EN AW-6086-T6薄合金板表面粗糙度的评估
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jun 2;14(11):3036. doi: 10.3390/ma14113036.
9
Investigation of cutting quality and surface roughness in abrasive water jet machining of bone.骨磨料水射流加工中切割质量和表面粗糙度的研究。
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2018 Sep;232(9):850-861. doi: 10.1177/0954411918790777. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
10
A Study on Processing Defects and Parameter Optimization in Abrasive Suspension Jet Cutting of Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Plastics.碳纤维增强塑料磨料悬浮液喷射切割中的加工缺陷与参数优化研究
Materials (Basel). 2023 Nov 7;16(22):7064. doi: 10.3390/ma16227064.

引用本文的文献

1
Experimental Analysis of Magnetic Focusing of the Plasma Arc of a Cutting Torch.割炬等离子弧磁聚焦的实验分析
Materials (Basel). 2025 Apr 15;18(8):1811. doi: 10.3390/ma18081811.
2
Modeling and Machine Learning of Vibration Amplitude and Surface Roughness after Waterjet Cutting.水射流切割后振动幅度和表面粗糙度的建模与机器学习
Materials (Basel). 2023 Sep 29;16(19):6474. doi: 10.3390/ma16196474.

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction and Analysis of Multi-Response Characteristics on Plasma Arc Cutting of Monel 400™ Alloy Using Mamdani-Fuzzy Logic System and Sensitivity Analysis.基于Mamdani模糊逻辑系统和敏感性分析的蒙乃尔400™合金等离子弧切割多响应特性预测与分析
Materials (Basel). 2020 Aug 12;13(16):3558. doi: 10.3390/ma13163558.