Wang Mengjie, Shen Jin, Thomas John C, Mu Tongtong, Liu Wei, Wang Yajing, Pan Jinfeng, Wang Qin, Liu Kaishi
School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255049, China.
Group Scientific Pty Ltd., 23 Pine Lodge Crescent, Grange, SA 5022, Australia.
Materials (Basel). 2021 Sep 29;14(19):5683. doi: 10.3390/ma14195683.
Dynamic light scattering (DLS) is a popular method of particle size measurement, but at ultra-low particle concentrations, the occurrence of number concentration fluctuations limits the use of the technique. Number fluctuations add a non-Gaussian term to the scattered light intensity autocorrelation function (ACF). This leads to an inaccurate particle size distribution (PSD) being recovered if the normal DLS analysis model is used. We propose two methods for inverting the DLS data and recovering the PSDs when number fluctuations are apparent. One is to directly establish the relationship between the non-Gaussian ACF and the PSD by the kernel function reconstruction (KFR) method while including the non-Gaussian term to recover the PSD. The other is to remove the effect of the non-Gaussian term in the ACF by the baseline reset (BR) method. By including the number fluctuation term, the ideal recovered PSD can be obtained from the simulated data, but this will not happen in the experimental measurement data. This is because the measured intensity ACF contains more noise than the simulated ACF at ultra-low concentration. In particular, the baseline noise at the tail of long delay time of ACF overwhelms the number fluctuation term, making it difficult to recover reliable PSD data. Resetting the baseline can effectively remove the digital fluctuation term in ACF, which is also a feasible method to improve PSD recovery under ultra-low concentration. However, increasing noise at ultra-low concentrations can lead to errors in determining an effective baseline. This greatly reduces the accuracy of inversion results. Results from simulated and measured ACF data show that, for both methods, noise on the ACF limits reliable PSD recovery.
动态光散射(DLS)是一种常用的粒度测量方法,但在超低颗粒浓度下,数浓度波动的出现限制了该技术的应用。数波动会给散射光强度自相关函数(ACF)添加一个非高斯项。如果使用常规的DLS分析模型,这会导致恢复的粒度分布(PSD)不准确。我们提出了两种在数波动明显时对DLS数据进行反演并恢复PSD的方法。一种是通过核函数重构(KFR)方法直接建立非高斯ACF与PSD之间的关系,同时纳入非高斯项以恢复PSD。另一种是通过基线重置(BR)方法消除ACF中非高斯项的影响。通过纳入数波动项,可以从模拟数据中获得理想的恢复PSD,但在实验测量数据中不会出现这种情况。这是因为在超低浓度下,测量的强度ACF比模拟的ACF包含更多噪声。特别是,ACF长延迟时间尾部的基线噪声淹没了数波动项,使得难以恢复可靠的PSD数据。重置基线可以有效消除ACF中的数字波动项,这也是在超低浓度下改善PSD恢复的一种可行方法。然而,超低浓度下噪声的增加会导致确定有效基线时出现误差。这大大降低了反演结果的准确性。模拟和测量的ACF数据结果表明,对于这两种方法,ACF上的噪声都限制了可靠的PSD恢复。