Centre for Applied Health Economics, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Nathan, Australia.
Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Mar;22(2):197-206. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2022.1993063. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
Autosomal recessive (AR) and x-linked (XL) conditions are rare but collectively common which impact millions of people globally on morbidity, mortality and costs. Advanced medical technologies allow prospective parents to make informed reproductive decisions to avoid having affected children. Economic evaluations targeting on reproductive carrier screening (RCS) for AR and/or XL conditions have been conducted, but there has not been a systematic review in this area.
A systematic search of economic evaluations for RCS was undertaken using the following databases - EMBASE, MEDLINE and SCOPUS. The search strategy was designed to capture full economic evaluations related to RCS since 1990. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) strategy. The included 23 studies adopted various types of methodologies to conduct economic evaluations. The majority of studies examined a single condition. The various clinical strategies and screened conditions caused the different cost-effectiveness conclusions in the published studies.
Establishing a validated and practical clinical strategy of RCS and investigating the cost-effectiveness of multiple conditions in one economic evaluation are critical for implementing RCS in the future. Further economic evaluations are essential to provide evidence-based practice for decision-makers.
常染色体隐性(AR)和 X 连锁(XL)疾病较为罕见,但在全球范围内,它们共同影响着数以百万计的人,造成发病率、死亡率和医疗费用的负担。先进的医疗技术使准父母能够做出明智的生育决策,以避免生育受影响的孩子。针对 AR 和/或 XL 疾病的生殖携带者筛查(RCS)已经进行了经济评估,但在这一领域尚未进行系统评价。
使用 EMBASE、MEDLINE 和 SCOPUS 这三个数据库,对 RCS 的经济评估进行了系统搜索。该搜索策略旨在获取自 1990 年以来与 RCS 相关的所有经济性评价。本综述遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)策略。纳入的 23 项研究采用了各种类型的方法学来进行经济性评价。大多数研究仅考察了一种疾病。由于发表的研究中采用了不同的临床策略和筛查条件,因此导致了不同的成本效益结论。
制定经过验证且实用的 RCS 临床策略,并在一项经济评估中调查多种疾病的成本效益,对于未来实施 RCS 至关重要。需要进一步的经济评估为决策者提供基于证据的实践。