Suppr超能文献

散发性包涵体肌炎和多发性肌炎伴线粒体病理的诊断和临床研究:单中心回顾性分析。

Diagnosis and Clinical Development of Sporadic Inclusion Body Myositis and Polymyositis With Mitochondrial Pathology: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.

机构信息

From the Section of Neuromuscular Diseases, Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany (MW, CvL, KK-H, CK, JR); Group Practice for Neurology, Bonn, Germany (SN); Center for Rare Diseases, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany (CK).

出版信息

J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2021 Nov 19;80(11):1060–1067. doi: 10.1093/jnen/nlab101. Epub 2021 Oct 13.

Abstract

To review our diagnostic and treatment approaches concerning sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) and polymyositis with mitochondrial pathology (PM-Mito), we conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical and histological data of 32 patients diagnosed as sIBM and 7 patients diagnosed as PM-Mito by muscle biopsy. Of 32 patients identified histologically as sIBM, 19 fulfilled the 2011 European Neuromuscular Center (ENMC) diagnostic criteria for "clinico-pathologically defined sIBM" at the time of biopsy. Among these, 2 patients developed sIBM after years of immunosuppressive treatment for organ transplantation. Of 11 patients fulfilling the histological but not the clinical criteria, including 3 cases with duration <12 months, 8 later fulfilled the criteria for clinico-pathologically defined sIBM. Of 7 PM-Mito patients, 4 received immunosuppression with clinical improvement in 3. One of these later developed clinico-pathologically defined sIBM; 1 untreated patient progressed to clinically defined sIBM. Thus, muscle histology remains important for this differential diagnosis to identify sIBM patients not matching the ENMC criteria and the PM-Mito group. In the latter, we report at least 50% positive, if occasionally transient, response to immunosuppressive treatments and progression to sIBM in a minority. The mitochondrial abnormalities defining PM-Mito do not seem to define the threshold to immunosuppression unresponsiveness.

摘要

为了回顾我们在散发性包涵体肌炎(sIBM)和伴有线粒体病理的多发性肌炎(PM-Mito)的诊断和治疗方法,我们对 32 例经肌肉活检诊断为 sIBM 和 7 例 PM-Mito 的患者的临床和组织学数据进行了回顾性分析。在 32 例组织学上诊断为 sIBM 的患者中,有 19 例在活检时符合 2011 年欧洲神经肌肉中心(ENMC)诊断“临床病理定义 sIBM”的标准。其中,2 例在接受器官移植的免疫抑制治疗多年后发展为 sIBM。在 11 例符合组织学但不符合临床标准的患者中,包括 3 例病程<12 个月的患者,8 例后来符合临床病理定义的 sIBM 标准。在 7 例 PM-Mito 患者中,4 例接受了免疫抑制治疗,3 例患者的临床症状有所改善。其中 1 例未接受治疗的患者进展为临床定义的 sIBM。因此,肌肉组织学对于这种鉴别诊断仍然很重要,可以识别不符合 ENMC 标准的 sIBM 患者和 PM-Mito 组。在后一组中,我们报告了至少 50%的患者对免疫抑制治疗有阳性反应(如果偶尔是短暂的),并且少数患者进展为 sIBM。定义 PM-Mito 的线粒体异常似乎并不能确定对免疫抑制治疗无反应的阈值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验