A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND

PAD is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality affecting over 200 million people worldwide. Current guidelines recommend at least a single antiplatelet or anticoagulant agent in symptomatic PAD and lifelong antithrombotic treatment after a revascularization procedure. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). PAD is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality affecting over 200 million people worldwide.

METHODS

The present systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Risk ratios (RR) were calculated using the random effects model.

RESULTS

Overall, 10 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. In 4 studies, 14,257 patients with PAD were enrolled and they were assigned to receive either aspirin (ASA)+/- clopidogrel (N = 5,894) or DOAC+/- anti-platelet (e.g., ASA, clopidogrel) (n = 8,363). Non DOAC users were found to have higher reintervention rates (RR 1.12; 95% CI 1.01-1.24; P = 0.025) compared to DOAC users. No statistically significant difference was observed between the 2 groups, in terms of major bleeding (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.50-1.23; P = 0.285), all-cause mortality (RR 0.98; 95% CI: 0.83-1.16; P = 0.818) and cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.73-1.333; P = 0.946) mortality. In addition, two real-world studies comparing DOAC with warfarin showed decreased rates of major cardiovascular events in the DOAC group.

CONCLUSION

DOAC use alone or combined with an anti-platelet agent could be associated with lower re-intervention rates, without increasing the risk for adverse bleeding events. However, this study failed to detect any difference in terms of all-cause mortality, MACEs and MALEs between DOAC users and DOAC naïve patients. Future studies are needed to better determine the efficacy and safety of DOACs in patients with PAD.