Wang Qiaoli, Qin Jiyong, Cao Ruixue, Xu Tianrui, Yan Jiawen, Zhu Sijin, Wu Jiang, Xu Guoqiang, Zhu Lixiu, Jiang Wei, Li Wenhui, Xiong Wei
Department of Radiotherapy, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Cancer Hospital Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 27;11:646584. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.646584. eCollection 2021.
Although intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and tomotherapy (TOMO) are broadly applied for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), the best technique remains unclear. Therefore, this study was conducted to address this issue.
The priority-classified plan optimization model was applied to IMRT, VMAT and TOMO plans in forty NPC patients according to the latest international guidelines. And the dosimetric parameters of planning target volumes (PTVs) and organs at risk (OARs) were compared among these three techniques. The Friedman M test in SPSS software was applied to assess significant differences.
The median PGTVnx coverage of IMRT was the lowest (93.5%, P < 0.001) for all T categories. VMAT was comparable to TOMO in OARs clarified as priority I and II, and both satisfied the prescribed requirement. IMRT resulted in a relatively high dose for V25 and V30. Interestingly, subgroup analysis showed that the median PTV coverage of the three techniques was no less than 95% in the early T stage. The heterogeneity index (HI) of PGTVnx in VMAT was better than that in IMRT (P = 0.028). Compared to TOMO, VMAT showed a strong ability to protect eyesight and decrease low-dose radiation volumes. In the advanced T stage subgroup, TOMO numerically achieved the highest median PGTVnx coverage volume compared with VMAT and IMRT (93.61%, 91% and 90%, respectively). The best CI and HI of PCTV-1 were observed in TOMO. Furthermore, TOMO was better than VMAT for sparing the brain stem, spinal cord and temporal lobes (all P < 0.05). However, the median V5, V10, V15, V20 and V25 were significantly higher with TOMO than with VMAT (all P < 0.05).
In the early T stage, VMAT provides a similar dose coverage and protection of OARs to IMRT, and there are no obvious advantages to choosing TOMO for NPC patients in the early T stage. TOMO may be recommended for patients in the advanced T stage due as it provides the largest dose coverage of PGTVnx and the best protection of the brain stem, spinal cord and temporal lobes. Additionally, more randomized clinical trials are needed for further clarification.
尽管调强放射治疗(IMRT)、容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)和断层放疗(TOMO)已广泛应用于鼻咽癌(NPC)的治疗,但最佳技术仍不明确。因此,本研究旨在解决这一问题。
根据最新国际指南,将优先级分类计划优化模型应用于40例NPC患者的IMRT、VMAT和TOMO计划中。并比较这三种技术在计划靶区(PTV)和危及器官(OAR)的剂量学参数。采用SPSS软件中的Friedman M检验评估显著差异。
在所有T类别中,IMRT的PGTVnx中位覆盖率最低(93.5%,P<0.001)。在优先级为I和II的OAR中,VMAT与TOMO相当,且均满足规定要求。IMRT导致V25和V30的剂量相对较高。有趣的是,亚组分析显示,在早期T阶段,三种技术的PTV中位覆盖率均不低于95%。VMAT中PGTVnx的异质性指数(HI)优于IMRT(P=0.028)。与TOMO相比,VMAT在保护视力和减少低剂量辐射体积方面表现出较强的能力。在晚期T阶段亚组中,与VMAT和IMRT相比,TOMO在数值上实现了最高的PGTVnx中位覆盖体积(分别为93.61%、91%和90%)。在TOMO中观察到PCCTV-1的最佳适形指数(CI)和HI。此外,在保护脑干、脊髓和颞叶方面,TOMO优于VMAT(所有P<0.05)。然而,TOMO的V5、V10、V15、V20和V25中位值显著高于VMAT(所有P<0.05)。
在早期T阶段,VMAT在剂量覆盖和OAR保护方面与IMRT相似,对于早期T阶段的NPC患者,选择TOMO没有明显优势。对于晚期T阶段的患者,可能推荐使用TOMO,因为它能提供最大的PGTVnx剂量覆盖,并能最佳地保护脑干、脊髓和颞叶。此外,还需要更多的随机临床试验进行进一步的阐明。