Suppr超能文献

数字健康技术会加剧健康差距吗?关于母亲对母婴健康手册数字化看法的聚类分析。

Can digital health technologies exacerbate the health gap? A clustering analysis of mothers' opinions toward digitizing the maternal and child health handbook.

作者信息

Goto Ryunosuke, Watanabe Yoko, Yamazaki Ako, Sugita Masatoshi, Takeda Satoru, Nakabayashi Masao, Nakamura Yasuhide

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.

Hachioji-city Public Health Center, 13-18 Asahicho, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0083, Japan.

出版信息

SSM Popul Health. 2021 Oct 1;16:100935. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100935. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of mobile health has increased worldwide, but along with its increased utilization comes the risk of the digital divide, inequity in access to information and communications technologies, exerting greater influence on health inequity caused by socioeconomic determinants of health. There is a growing need to investigate whether the digitization of existing health interventions has a risk of worsening the health gap.

METHODS

We investigated the attitudes of mothers and pregnant women toward digitization of the Maternal and Child Health Handbook (MCHH), a popular personal health record (PHR) used by almost every pregnant woman or mother in Japan, using a cross-sectional survey. We determined sociodemographic factors associated with favorable opinions toward digitization using a multivariate regression model. We then grouped the participants using partitioning around medoids clustering, a machine-learning approach, to interpret their varying attitudes toward digitization in light of their sociodemographic characteristics as well as their affinity toward the paper MCHH.

FINDINGS

Higher income and educational level, older age, and less reliance on the MCHH were significantly associated with favorable opinion toward digitization. Clustering analysis identified four latent clusters. The cluster with the highest socioeconomic status (SES) was the most favorable toward digitization, while two clusters with the lowest SES, one of which relied heavily on the paper MCHH, were less favorable of digitization compared to the high SES cluster. The final cluster was comprised of mothers with the experience of raising multiple children and did not rely heavily on the MCHH.

INTERPRETATION

Our study identified a socioeconomic divide in opinions toward digitization of an existing health intervention. A hasty digitization may result in an unbalanced uptake of the digitized health intervention among different social classes.

摘要

背景

移动健康技术在全球范围内的使用有所增加,但随着其利用率的提高,出现了数字鸿沟的风险,即获取信息和通信技术方面的不平等,这对由健康的社会经济决定因素导致的健康不平等产生了更大影响。越来越有必要调查现有健康干预措施的数字化是否存在加剧健康差距的风险。

方法

我们采用横断面调查,研究了母亲和孕妇对《母婴健康手册》(MCHH)数字化的态度,《母婴健康手册》是日本几乎每位孕妇或母亲都使用的一种流行的个人健康记录(PHR)。我们使用多元回归模型确定了与对数字化持赞成意见相关的社会人口学因素。然后,我们使用围绕中心点的划分聚类(一种机器学习方法)对参与者进行分组,以根据他们的社会人口学特征以及对纸质MCHH的亲和力来解释他们对数字化的不同态度。

结果

较高的收入和教育水平、较高的年龄以及对MCHH的依赖程度较低与对数字化持赞成意见显著相关。聚类分析确定了四个潜在类别。社会经济地位(SES)最高的类别对数字化最赞成,而SES最低的两个类别,其中一个严重依赖纸质MCHH,与高SES类别相比,对数字化不太赞成。最后一个类别由有多个孩子养育经验且不太依赖MCHH的母亲组成。

解读

我们的研究发现了对现有健康干预措施数字化的态度存在社会经济差异。仓促的数字化可能会导致不同社会阶层对数字化健康干预措施的采用不均衡。

相似文献

2
Digitization and Health in Germany: Cross-sectional Nationwide Survey.
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Nov 22;7(11):e32951. doi: 10.2196/32951.
4
The Mother and Child Health Handbook in Japan as a Health Promotion Tool: An Overview of Its History, Contents, Use, Benefits, and Global Influence.
Glob Pediatr Health. 2016 May 18;3:2333794X16649884. doi: 10.1177/2333794X16649884. eCollection 2016.
10
Oral health-related quality-of-life scores differ by socioeconomic status and caries experience.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2017 Jun;45(3):216-224. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12279. Epub 2017 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

1
From handbooks to platforms: Japan's maternal and child health services in the digital era.
J Glob Health. 2025 Jun 20;15:03028. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.03028.
2
8
The use of digital technology for social wellbeing reduces social isolation in older adults: A systematic review.
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Dec 30;17:101020. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.101020. eCollection 2022 Mar.

本文引用的文献

2
Impact of the digital divide in the age of COVID-19.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jul 1;27(7):1147-1148. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa078.
3
Covid-19 and Health Care's Digital Revolution.
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 4;382(23):e82. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2005835. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
5
How Can Digital Health Technologies Contribute to Sustainable Attainment of Universal Health Coverage in Africa? A Perspective.
Front Public Health. 2019 Nov 15;7:341. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00341. eCollection 2019.
7
Effectiveness of home-based records on maternal, newborn and child health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 2;14(1):e0209278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209278. eCollection 2019.
8
Intergenerational Associations of Parent Adverse Childhood Experiences and Child Health Outcomes.
Pediatrics. 2018 Jun;141(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-4274. Epub 2018 May 21.
9
A socioeconomic related 'digital divide' exists in how, not if, young people use computers.
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 31;12(3):e0175011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175011. eCollection 2017.
10
Health Literacy and Health Information Technology Adoption: The Potential for a New Digital Divide.
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Oct 4;18(10):e264. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6349.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验