Mkorombindo Tino, Glassman Steven D, Gum Jeffrey L, Brown Morgan E, Daniels Christy L, Carreon Leah Y
University of Louisville School of Medicine, 500 South Preston Street, Instructional Building, Room 305, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, 550 S. Jackson Street, 1st Floor ACB, Louisville, Kentucky 40202, USA; Norton Leatherman Spine Center, 210 East Gray St, Suite #900, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Spine J. 2022 Apr;22(4):535-541. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.10.001. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
Surgical decision making for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) relies on evaluation of symptoms and physical examination. The Romberg test is a clinical exam used to identify balance issues with CSM. However, the Romberg test has a subjective interpretation and has a binary (positive or negative) result.
This study aims to compare force plate pressure readings during a standard Romberg test in patients with CSM to age-matched normal healthy volunteers.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Prospective cross sectional observational comparative cohort from a single multi-surgeon spine center.
Patients who were clinically diagnosed with CSM were compared to age-matched healthy volunteers without a clinical history of spine pathology.
Quantitative Romberg Force Plate Measurements METHODS: Patients with CSM requiring surgery and healthy normal volunteers were asked to perform the Romberg test while on a force plate measuring the center of pressure (COP): standing up straight with arms extended for 30 seconds with eyes open, followed by 30 seconds with eyes closed. The change for total sway area, sway frequency and sway speed with eyes closed and eyes open were calculated and compared between patients with CSM and healthy volunteers.
Thirty-four CSM patients were age-matched to 34 healthy volunteers. There was a larger change in quantitative Romberg measurements with eyes open versus eyes closed in CSM patients compared to normal volunteers for maximum lateral movement (10.79 cm vs. 0.94 cm, p=.003), maximum anterior-posterior movement (15.06 cm vs. 10.00 cm p=.201), total lateral CoP movement (89.82cm vs. 18.71cm, p=.007), total AP CoP movement (154.68 cm vs. 87.47 cm, p=.601), total CoP trace movement (199.79 cm vs. 88.44 cm, p=.014), sway area (284.74 cm vs. 57.76 cm, p=.006), and average speed (7.00 cm/s vs. 2.91 cm/s, p=.006).
Poor standing balance can be quantified in patients with CSM. Quantifying standing balance in patients with CSM shows significantly worse objective measures than age-matched healthy volunteers. The Romberg test on a force plate may help diagnose and evaluate patients with CSM, guide patient management and potentially grade the severity of spinal pathology. Further studies are needed to determine its utility in monitoring disease progression and measure treatment effectiveness.
脊髓型颈椎病(CSM)的手术决策依赖于症状评估和体格检查。罗姆伯格试验是一种用于识别CSM平衡问题的临床检查。然而,罗姆伯格试验存在主观解读,且结果为二元(阳性或阴性)。
本研究旨在比较CSM患者与年龄匹配的正常健康志愿者在标准罗姆伯格试验期间的测力台压力读数。
研究设计/地点:来自单一多外科医生脊柱中心的前瞻性横断面观察性比较队列。
将临床诊断为CSM的患者与无脊柱病理临床病史的年龄匹配健康志愿者进行比较。
定量罗姆伯格测力台测量
要求需要手术的CSM患者和健康正常志愿者在测力台上进行罗姆伯格试验,测量压力中心(COP):伸直手臂直立站立30秒,睁眼,然后闭眼30秒。计算并比较CSM患者和健康志愿者闭眼和睁眼时总摆动面积、摆动频率和摆动速度的变化。
34例CSM患者与34名健康志愿者年龄匹配。与正常志愿者相比,CSM患者睁眼与闭眼时罗姆伯格测量的变化在最大侧向运动(10.79厘米对0.94厘米,p = 0.003)、最大前后运动(15.06厘米对10.00厘米,p = 0.201)、总侧向COP运动(89.82厘米对18.71厘米,p = 0.007)、总前后COP运动(154.68厘米对87.47厘米,p = 0.601)、总COP轨迹运动(199.79厘米对88.44厘米,p = 0.014)、摆动面积(284.74厘米对57.76厘米,p = 0.006)和平均速度(7.00厘米/秒对2.91厘米/秒,p = 0.006)方面更大。
CSM患者的站立平衡不良可以量化。与年龄匹配的健康志愿者相比,量化CSM患者的站立平衡显示客观指标明显更差。在测力台上进行罗姆伯格试验可能有助于诊断和评估CSM患者,指导患者管理并潜在地对脊柱病理严重程度进行分级。需要进一步研究以确定其在监测疾病进展和测量治疗效果方面的效用。