• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用项目反应理论估计患者报告结局临床试验的效能。

Estimating power for clinical trials with Patient Reported Outcomes - using Item Response Theory.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.

Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Jan;141:141-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.10.002. Epub 2021 Oct 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.10.002
PMID:34648941
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Patient reported outcomes (PRO) are widely used in quality of life (QOL) studies, health outcomes research, and clinical trials. The importance of PRO has been advocated by health authorities. Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a collection of standardized measures of PROs using Item Response Theory (IRT). However, in clinical trials with PROs as endpoints, observed scores are routinely used for power estimation rather than IRT scores. This paper aims to fill this gap and estimate power in a two-arm clinical trials with PROMIS measures as endpoints with IRT model.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We conducted a series of simulations to study the IRT power with validated PROMIS measures controlling factors including sample size, effect size, number of items, and missing data proportion.

RESULTS

Our results showed that sample size, effect size, and number of items are important indicators of IRT based power estimation for PROMIS measures. When effect size is small and sample size is limited, IRT model provides higher power than the closed form formula.

CONCLUSION

IRT based simulation should be used for power estimation in two-armed clinical, especially when there is small effect size or small sample size.

摘要

目的

患者报告的结局(PRO)广泛应用于生活质量(QOL)研究、健康结果研究和临床试验中。健康当局提倡 PRO 的重要性。患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)是使用项目反应理论(IRT)的 PRO 标准化测量的集合。然而,在以 PRO 为终点的临床试验中,观察到的分数通常用于功效估计而不是 IRT 分数。本文旨在通过 IRT 模型填补这一空白,并估计以 PROMIS 测量为终点的两臂临床试验中的功效。

研究设计和设置

我们进行了一系列模拟研究,以研究具有验证的 PROMIS 措施的 IRT 功效,控制因素包括样本量、效应大小、项目数量和缺失数据比例。

结果

我们的结果表明,样本量、效应大小和项目数量是基于 IRT 的 PROMIS 措施功效估计的重要指标。当效应量较小时且样本量有限时,IRT 模型比闭式公式提供更高的功效。

结论

应该使用基于 IRT 的模拟来进行两臂临床试验的功效估计,特别是当效应量较小或样本量较小时。

相似文献

1
Estimating power for clinical trials with Patient Reported Outcomes - using Item Response Theory.使用项目反应理论估计患者报告结局临床试验的效能。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Jan;141:141-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.10.002. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
2
Differential Item Functioning Analyses of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Measures: Methods, Challenges, Advances, and Future Directions.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS®)测评的项目区分度分析:方法、挑战、进展及未来方向。
Psychometrika. 2021 Sep;86(3):674-711. doi: 10.1007/s11336-021-09775-0. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
3
Methodological issues regarding power of classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT)-based approaches for the comparison of patient-reported outcomes in two groups of patients--a simulation study.关于经典测量理论(CTT)和项目反应理论(IRT)方法在两组患者间比较患者报告结局的功效的方法学问题——一项模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Mar 25;10:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-24.
4
Improved responsiveness and reduced sample size requirements of PROMIS physical function scales with item response theory.使用项目反应理论提高 PROMIS 身体功能量表的反应性和减少样本量需求。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13(5):R147. doi: 10.1186/ar3461. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
5
Does Scoring Method Impact Estimation of Significant Individual Changes Assessed by Patient-Reported Outcome Measures? Comparing Classical Test Theory Versus Item Response Theory.评分方法是否会影响患者报告结局测量评估的显著个体变化的估计?经典测量理论与项目反应理论的比较。
Value Health. 2023 Oct;26(10):1518-1524. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.06.002. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
6
Impact of IRT item misfit on score estimates and severity classifications: an examination of PROMIS depression and pain interference item banks.IRT项目不匹配对分数估计和严重程度分类的影响:对患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)抑郁和疼痛干扰项目库的检验
Qual Life Res. 2017 Mar;26(3):555-564. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1467-3. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
7
Item response theory, computerized adaptive testing, and PROMIS: assessment of physical function.项目反应理论、计算机化自适应测验和 PROMIS:身体功能评估。
J Rheumatol. 2014 Jan;41(1):153-8. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130813. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
8
PROMIS Global Health item nonresponse: is it better to impute missing item responses before computing T-scores?PROMIS 全球健康项目无应答:在计算 T 分数之前,对缺失项目的应答进行插补是否更好?
Qual Life Res. 2020 Feb;29(2):537-546. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02327-1. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
9
Application of the National Institutes of Health Patient-reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) to mental health research.美国国立卫生研究院患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)在心理健康研究中的应用。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2011 Dec;14(4):201-8.
10
The case for an international patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS®) initiative.支持建立国际患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS®)倡议。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Dec 20;11:210. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-210.

引用本文的文献

1
Bayesian item response theory to estimate power in clinical trials with patient-reported outcomes as endpoints.采用贝叶斯项目反应理论估计以患者报告结局为终点的临床试验效能。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Apr;34(4):1113-1124. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03874-y. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
2
Power Analysis for the Wald, LR, Score, and Gradient Tests in a Marginal Maximum Likelihood Framework: Applications in IRT.边缘极大似然框架下 Wald、LR、Score 和梯度检验的功效分析:IRT 中的应用。
Psychometrika. 2023 Dec;88(4):1249-1298. doi: 10.1007/s11336-022-09883-5. Epub 2022 Aug 27.