Suppr超能文献

验证 GeneXpert 检测在阿曼八家医院实验室检测 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 的效果。

Validation of GeneXpert testing for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in eight hospital laboratories in Oman.

机构信息

Medical Microbiology, Khoula Hospital, Muscat, Oman.

Central Public Health Laboratory, Darsait, Oman.

出版信息

Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Sep 1;40:2. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.40.2.27224. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

In response to the current COVID-19 pandemic, numerous commercial assays have been developed for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 for use in the clinical diagnostic laboratories. To date, there is limited comparison of testing methods performed in different hospital laboratory sites. The aims of the study were to evaluate the analytical performance of Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 when compared to RT-PCR. This is a cross-sectional study. A total of 155 nasopharyngeal swabs were taken in duplicate from patients presenting with suspected COVID-19 to 8 hospitals in Oman. One swab was tested by the hospital laboratory and the duplicate swab was sent to the national Central Public Health Laboratory (CPHL) for testing. We compared the analytical performance of the commercially available point of care Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay which was used in the 8 different hospitals with assays including Liferiver, Sansure, TIB MOL BIOL, Kingfisher and COBAS 6800 by Roche which were performed at the CPHL. Testing of the duplicate swabs revealed excellent agreement of results with the viral loads of Ct values ranging from 16-43 for the E gene, 18-44 for the N gene and 17-44 for the ORF gene using the Liferiver assay. The overall sample sensitivity and specificity of the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay were both 100% and there was 100% agreement across specimens. We conclude that the rapid GeneXpert and RT-PCR kits assessed in this study may be used for routine diagnostic testing of COVID-19 patients by experienced clinical microbiology diagnostic laboratories. Our results highlight the importance of rapid molecular testing at different sites within a country in a public health emergency.

摘要

针对当前的 COVID-19 大流行,已经开发出许多用于临床诊断实验室检测 SARS-CoV-2 的商业检测方法。迄今为止,在不同医院实验室进行的测试方法比较有限。本研究的目的是评估 Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 与 RT-PCR 相比的分析性能。这是一项横断面研究。从 8 家阿曼医院出现疑似 COVID-19 的患者中采集了 155 份鼻咽拭子进行双份检测。一份拭子由医院实验室检测,另一份拭子送往国家中央公共卫生实验室(CPHL)进行检测。我们比较了在 8 家不同医院使用的市售即时护理 Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 检测方法与 Liferiver、Sansure、TIB MOL BIOL、Kingfisher 和 Roche 的 COBAS 6800 检测方法的分析性能。对双份拭子的检测结果显示,Liferiver 检测的 E 基因 Ct 值为 16-43,N 基因 Ct 值为 18-44,ORF 基因 Ct 值为 17-44,与病毒载量具有极好的一致性。Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 检测方法的总样本敏感性和特异性均为 100%,并且在所有标本中均具有 100%的一致性。我们得出结论,在本研究中评估的快速 GeneXpert 和 RT-PCR 试剂盒可由经验丰富的临床微生物学诊断实验室用于常规 COVID-19 患者的诊断检测。我们的研究结果强调了在突发公共卫生事件中在一个国家的不同地点进行快速分子检测的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc7b/8490169/5483ef2bfd51/PAMJ-40-2-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验