Suppr超能文献

改善跨学科沟通:肿瘤学中实施标准化结构化报告的障碍与促进因素

Improving Interdisciplinary Communication: Barriers and Facilitators for Implementation of Standardized Structured Reporting in Oncology.

作者信息

Swillens Julie E M, Voorham Quirinus J M, Nagtegaal Iris D, Hermens Rosella P M G

机构信息

1Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences (RIHS), Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen.

2PALGA Foundation, Houten; and.

出版信息

J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Oct 15:1-11. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.7002.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Standardized structured reporting (SSR) improves quality of diagnostic cancer reporting and interdisciplinary communication in multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings, resulting in more adequate treatment decisions and better health outcomes. However, use of SSR varies widely among pathologists, but might be encouraged by MDT members (MDTMs). Our objectives were to identify barriers and facilitators (influencing factors) for SSR implementation in oncologic pathology from the perspective of MDTMs and their determinants.

METHODS

In a multimethod design, we identified influencing factors for SSR implementation related to MDT meetings, using 5 domains: (1) innovation factors, (2) individual professional factors, (3) social setting factors, (4) organizational factors, and (5) political and legal factors. Four focus groups with MDTMs in urologic, gynecologic, and gastroenterologic oncology were conducted. We used an eSurvey among MDTMs to quantify the qualitative findings and to analyze determinants affecting these influencing factors.

RESULTS

Twenty-three MDTMs practicing in 9 oncology-related disciplines participated in the focus groups and yielded 28 barriers and 28 facilitators in all domains. The eSurvey yielded 211 responses. Main barriers related to lack of readability of SSR: difficulties with capturing nuances (66%) and formulation of the conclusion (43%); lack of transparency in the development (50%) and feedback processes of SSR templates (38%); and lack of information exchange about SSR between pathologists and other MDTMs (45%). Main facilitators were encouragement of pathologists' SSR use by MDTMs (90%) and expanding the recommendation of SSR use in national guidelines (80%). Oncology-related medical discipline and MDT type were the most relevant determinants for SSR implementation barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

Although SSR makes diagnostic reports more complete, this study shows important barriers in implementing SSR in oncologic pathology. The next step is to use these factors for developing and testing implementation tools to improve SSR implementation.

摘要

背景

标准化结构化报告(SSR)可提高癌症诊断报告的质量,并改善多学科团队(MDT)会议中的跨学科沟通,从而做出更恰当的治疗决策并带来更好的健康结果。然而,SSR在病理学家中的使用差异很大,但MDT成员(MDTMs)可能会鼓励使用。我们的目标是从MDTMs的角度确定肿瘤病理学中SSR实施的障碍和促进因素(影响因素)及其决定因素。

方法

在多方法设计中,我们使用五个领域确定了与MDT会议相关的SSR实施影响因素:(1)创新因素,(2)个人专业因素,(3)社会环境因素,(4)组织因素,以及(5)政治和法律因素。对泌尿外科、妇科和胃肠肿瘤学领域的MDTMs进行了四个焦点小组访谈。我们对MDTMs进行了电子调查,以量化定性结果并分析影响这些影响因素的决定因素。

结果

来自9个肿瘤相关学科的23名MDTMs参加了焦点小组访谈,在所有领域共产生了28个障碍和28个促进因素。电子调查共收到211份回复。主要障碍包括SSR缺乏可读性:难以捕捉细微差别(66%)和得出结论(43%);SSR模板的开发(50%)和反馈过程缺乏透明度(38%);以及病理学家与其他MDTMs之间缺乏关于SSR的信息交流(45%)。主要促进因素是MDTMs鼓励病理学家使用SSR(90%)以及在国家指南中扩大SSR使用的建议(80%)。肿瘤相关医学学科和MDT类型是SSR实施障碍最相关的决定因素。

结论

虽然SSR使诊断报告更完整,但本研究显示了在肿瘤病理学中实施SSR的重要障碍。下一步是利用这些因素开发和测试实施工具,以改善SSR的实施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验