The University of British Columbia, Department of Surgery, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6H3V4.
Division of Pediatric Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Jan;57(1):12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.09.022. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
Standardized protocols have been shown to improve outcomes in several pediatric surgical conditions. We implemented a multi-disciplinary gastroschisis practice bundle at our institution in 2013. We sought to evaluate its impact on closure type and early clinical outcomes.
We performed a retrospective review of uncomplicated gastroschisis patients treated at our institution between 2008-2019. Patients were divided into two groups: pre- and post-protocol implementation. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare closure location, method, and success.
Neonates (pre-implementation n = 53, post-implementation n = 43) were similar across baseline variables. Successful immediate closure rates were comparable (75.5% vs. 72.1%, p = 0.71). The proportion of bedside closures increased significantly after protocol implementation (35.3% vs. 95.4%, p < 0.01), as did the proportion of sutureless closures (32.5% vs. 71.0%, p < 0.01). Median postoperative mechanical ventilation decreased significantly (4 days IQR [3, 5] vs. 2 days IQR [1, 3], p < 0.01). Postoperative complications and duration of parenteral nutrition were equivalent. After controlling for potential confounding, infants in the post-implementation group had a 44.0 times higher odds of undergoing bedside closure (95% CI: 9.0, 215.2, p < 0.01) and a 7.7 times higher odds of undergoing sutureless closure (95% CI: 2.3, 25.1, p < 0.01).
Implementing a standardized gastroschisis protocol significantly increased the proportion of immediate bedside sutureless closures and decreased the duration of mechanical ventilation, without increasing postoperative complications. Level of Evidence III Type of Study Retrospective comparative study.
多项研究表明,标准化方案可以改善多种儿科手术的结果。我院于 2013 年实施了多学科腹裂治疗方案包。我们旨在评估其对关闭类型和早期临床结果的影响。
我们对我院 2008-2019 年期间治疗的单纯性腹裂患者进行了回顾性研究。患者分为两组:方案实施前和实施后。采用多变量逻辑回归比较关闭位置、方法和成功率。
新生儿(实施前 n=53,实施后 n=43)在基线变量方面无差异。即时关闭成功率相似(75.5%比 72.1%,p=0.71)。方案实施后床边关闭的比例显著增加(35.3%比 95.4%,p<0.01),无缝线关闭的比例也显著增加(32.5%比 71.0%,p<0.01)。术后机械通气时间中位数显著缩短(4 天 IQR [3,5]比 2 天 IQR [1,3],p<0.01)。术后并发症和肠外营养时间无差异。控制潜在混杂因素后,实施后组患儿床边关闭的可能性是实施前组的 44.0 倍(95%CI:9.0,215.2,p<0.01),无缝线关闭的可能性是实施前组的 7.7 倍(95%CI:2.3,25.1,p<0.01)。
实施标准化腹裂方案显著增加了即时床边无缝线关闭的比例,缩短了机械通气时间,而不增加术后并发症。证据等级 III 回顾性比较研究。