Suppr超能文献

用于多维强迫量表(DOCS)的新谨小慎微量表:对临床和非临床样本的验证。

A New Scrupulosity Scale for the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (DOCS): Validation With Clinical and Nonclinical Samples.

机构信息

Rogers Behavioral Health.

University of Ottawa.

出版信息

Behav Ther. 2021 Nov;52(6):1449-1463. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2021.04.001. Epub 2021 Apr 21.

Abstract

Scrupulous obsessions are a prominent presentation of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Previous conceptualizations of scrupulosity have indicated that it belongs to the unacceptable thoughts dimension, which pertains to sexual, violent, and religious obsessive themes. However, research suggests that scrupulous symptoms may differ from other unacceptable thoughts symptoms, necessitating the need for targeted and thorough assessment. We added a Scrupulous or Religious Thoughts subscale (DOCS-SR) to the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (DOCS) and tested its factorial structure, psychometric properties, and clinical correlates in a nonclinical and clinical sample. In the first study, nonclinical participants (N = 203) completed the DOCS-SR, which was subjected to an exploratory factor analysis. Analyses revealed that the DOCS-SR reflected a one-factor solution and possessed acceptable internal consistency, as well as strong convergent validity with clinical correlates of OCD. In the second study, we administered the DOCS, as well as the DOCS-SR to a clinical sample (N = 314). An exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis both suggested that the four subscales and additional DOCS-SR represented a five-factor solution. Internal consistency and convergent validity were strong. The DOCS Unacceptable Thoughts subscale and the DOCS-SR shared a moderate correlation but evidenced differences in associations with other correlates. This suggested both convergent and divergent validity. Collectively, our results support the utility of examining the individual components of the unacceptable thoughts dimension of OCD for effective assessment and treatment planning.

摘要

谨小慎微是强迫症(OCD)的一个突出表现。之前对过分谨小慎微的概念化表明,它属于不可接受的思维维度,涉及性、暴力和宗教强迫性主题。然而,研究表明,过分谨小慎微的症状可能与其他不可接受的思维症状不同,因此需要进行有针对性和全面的评估。我们在多维强迫量表(DOCS)中添加了一个过分谨小慎微或宗教思维分量表(DOCS-SR),并在非临床和临床样本中测试了其因子结构、心理测量特性和临床相关性。在第一项研究中,非临床参与者(N=203)完成了 DOCS-SR,我们对其进行了探索性因素分析。分析表明,DOCS-SR 反映了一个单因素解决方案,具有可接受的内部一致性,以及与 OCD 临床相关性的强收敛效度。在第二项研究中,我们向临床样本(N=314)发放了 DOCS 和 DOCS-SR。探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析都表明,四个分量表和额外的 DOCS-SR 代表了一个五因素解决方案。内部一致性和收敛效度很强。DOCS 不可接受的思维分量表和 DOCS-SR 具有中等相关性,但与其他相关性的关联存在差异,这表明存在收敛和发散效度。总的来说,我们的研究结果支持了对 OCD 不可接受思维维度的各个组成部分进行检查以进行有效评估和治疗计划的有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验