• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于多维强迫量表(DOCS)的新谨小慎微量表:对临床和非临床样本的验证。

A New Scrupulosity Scale for the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (DOCS): Validation With Clinical and Nonclinical Samples.

机构信息

Rogers Behavioral Health.

University of Ottawa.

出版信息

Behav Ther. 2021 Nov;52(6):1449-1463. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2021.04.001. Epub 2021 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.beth.2021.04.001
PMID:34656198
Abstract

Scrupulous obsessions are a prominent presentation of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Previous conceptualizations of scrupulosity have indicated that it belongs to the unacceptable thoughts dimension, which pertains to sexual, violent, and religious obsessive themes. However, research suggests that scrupulous symptoms may differ from other unacceptable thoughts symptoms, necessitating the need for targeted and thorough assessment. We added a Scrupulous or Religious Thoughts subscale (DOCS-SR) to the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (DOCS) and tested its factorial structure, psychometric properties, and clinical correlates in a nonclinical and clinical sample. In the first study, nonclinical participants (N = 203) completed the DOCS-SR, which was subjected to an exploratory factor analysis. Analyses revealed that the DOCS-SR reflected a one-factor solution and possessed acceptable internal consistency, as well as strong convergent validity with clinical correlates of OCD. In the second study, we administered the DOCS, as well as the DOCS-SR to a clinical sample (N = 314). An exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis both suggested that the four subscales and additional DOCS-SR represented a five-factor solution. Internal consistency and convergent validity were strong. The DOCS Unacceptable Thoughts subscale and the DOCS-SR shared a moderate correlation but evidenced differences in associations with other correlates. This suggested both convergent and divergent validity. Collectively, our results support the utility of examining the individual components of the unacceptable thoughts dimension of OCD for effective assessment and treatment planning.

摘要

谨小慎微是强迫症(OCD)的一个突出表现。之前对过分谨小慎微的概念化表明,它属于不可接受的思维维度,涉及性、暴力和宗教强迫性主题。然而,研究表明,过分谨小慎微的症状可能与其他不可接受的思维症状不同,因此需要进行有针对性和全面的评估。我们在多维强迫量表(DOCS)中添加了一个过分谨小慎微或宗教思维分量表(DOCS-SR),并在非临床和临床样本中测试了其因子结构、心理测量特性和临床相关性。在第一项研究中,非临床参与者(N=203)完成了 DOCS-SR,我们对其进行了探索性因素分析。分析表明,DOCS-SR 反映了一个单因素解决方案,具有可接受的内部一致性,以及与 OCD 临床相关性的强收敛效度。在第二项研究中,我们向临床样本(N=314)发放了 DOCS 和 DOCS-SR。探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析都表明,四个分量表和额外的 DOCS-SR 代表了一个五因素解决方案。内部一致性和收敛效度很强。DOCS 不可接受的思维分量表和 DOCS-SR 具有中等相关性,但与其他相关性的关联存在差异,这表明存在收敛和发散效度。总的来说,我们的研究结果支持了对 OCD 不可接受思维维度的各个组成部分进行检查以进行有效评估和治疗计划的有效性。

相似文献

1
A New Scrupulosity Scale for the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (DOCS): Validation With Clinical and Nonclinical Samples.用于多维强迫量表(DOCS)的新谨小慎微量表:对临床和非临床样本的验证。
Behav Ther. 2021 Nov;52(6):1449-1463. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2021.04.001. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
2
Rethinking Unacceptable Thoughts: Validation of an Expanded Version of the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale.重新思考不可接受的想法:多维强迫量表扩展版的验证。
Behav Ther. 2024 Jul;55(4):786-800. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2023.11.003. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
3
Assessing Sexually Intrusive Thoughts: Parsing Unacceptable Thoughts on the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale.评估性侵犯相关想法:在维度强迫症量表上剖析不可接受的想法。
Behav Ther. 2015 Jul;46(4):544-56. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2015.05.006. Epub 2015 May 22.
4
Spanish version of the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (DOCS): psychometric properties and relation to obsessive beliefs.西班牙语版多维强迫量表(DOCS):心理测量特性及其与强迫观念的关系。
Compr Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;55(1):206-14. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.08.015. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
5
[Dimensional Approach to Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale with Turkish Psychometric Properties].[强迫症的维度研究方法:具有土耳其心理测量特性的维度强迫症量表]
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2018 Summer;29(2):122-130.
6
Validation of the Penn Inventory of Scrupulosity (PIOS) in scrupulous and nonscrupulous patients: Revision of factor structure and psychometrics.强迫症患者与非强迫症患者中宾夕法尼亚谨小慎微量表(PIOS)的验证:因子结构与心理测量学的修订
Psychol Assess. 2016 Jun;28(6):639-51. doi: 10.1037/pas0000203. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
7
Fear of Self and Unacceptable Thoughts in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.强迫症中的自我恐惧与不可接受的想法
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2016 May;23(3):226-35. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1950. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
8
Development and Validation of the Morphing Fear Questionnaire (MFQ).变形恐惧问卷(MFQ)的编制与验证
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2016 Nov;23(6):533-542. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1987. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
9
[A study of the psychometric properties of the Icelandic translation of Obsessive Thoughts Checklist (OTC) with confirmatory factor analysis].[一项采用验证性因素分析对强迫观念检查表(OTC)冰岛语翻译版进行心理测量学特性研究]
Encephale. 2005 Mar-Apr;31(2):144-51. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82381-4.
10
Discriminative Validity of the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale for Separating Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder From Anxiety Disorders.维度强迫症量表在区分强迫症与焦虑症方面的区分效度
Assessment. 2020 Jun;27(4):810-821. doi: 10.1177/1073191118791039. Epub 2018 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of an acceptance and commitment therapy with religious content to control obsessive-compulsive disorder, dysfunctional beliefs, feeling guilty, scrupulosity, and thought control among Muslims in Iran.评估一种具有宗教内容的接纳与承诺疗法对伊朗穆斯林中强迫症、功能失调信念、内疚感、顾虑过多及思维控制的控制效果。
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Jul 29;13:272. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_760_23. eCollection 2024.