Department of Infection and Immunity, Royal London Hospital, London, UK.
Sección de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital General Universitario Reina Sofía, Murcia, Spain.
Lancet HIV. 2021 Nov;8(11):e668-e678. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00184-3. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
Previous work established non-inferiority of switching participants who were virologically suppressed from daily oral standard of care to monthly long-acting intramuscular injections of cabotegravir plus rilpivirine over 96 weeks following a cabotegravir plus rilpivirine oral lead-in. Here, we report an evaluation of switching participants from standard of care oral regimens to long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine via direct-to-injection or oral lead-in pathways.
This study reports the week 124 results of the FLAIR study, an ongoing phase 3, randomised, open-label, multicentre (11 countries) trial. Antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive participants who were virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per mL) during the 20-week induction phase with standard of care were randomly assigned (1:1) to continue the standard of care oral regimen or switch to long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine (283 per group) in the 100-week maintenance phase. Randomisation was stratified by sex at birth and baseline (pre-induction) HIV-1 RNA (<100 000 or ≥100 000 copies per mL). Participants randomly assigned to long-acting therapy at baseline received a cabotegravir (30 mg) plus rilpivirine (25 mg) once daily oral lead-in for at least 4 weeks before first injection and could choose to continue long-acting cabotegravir (400 mg) plus rilpivirine (600 mg) every 4 weeks from week 100 or withdraw. At week 100, participants in the oral comparator ART group, in discussion with the investigator, could elect to switch to long-acting therapy (extension switch population), either direct-to-injection or with a 4 week oral lead-in (oral lead-in group), or withdraw. Week 124 endpoints included plasma HIV-1 RNA 50 or more copies per mL and less than 50 copies per mL (US Food and Drug Administration [FDA] Snapshot), confirmed virological failure (two consecutive HIV-1 RNA ≥200 copies per mL), and safety and tolerability. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02938520.
Screening occurred between Oct 27, 2016, and March 24, 2017. At week 100, 232 (92%) of 253 participants transitioned to long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine in the extension phase (111 [48%] in the direct-to-injection group and 121 [52%] in the oral lead-in group; extension switch population). 243 (86%) of the 283 who were randomly assigned to the long-acting therapy group continued the long-acting regimen into the extension phase. One (<1%) participant in each extension switch group had 50 or more HIV-1 RNA copies per mL; 110 (99%) participants in the direct-to-injection group and 113 (93%) participants in the oral lead-in group remained suppressed (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per mL) at the week 124 Snapshot. The lower suppression rates in the oral lead-in group were driven by non-virological reasons. For participants in the randomly assigned long-acting group, 227 (80%) of 283 participants remained suppressed; at the week 124 Snapshot, 14 (5%) participants had HIV-1 RNA 50 or more copies per mL, including five additional participants since the week 96 analysis. The remaining 42 (15%) participants in the randomly assigned long-acting group had no virological data. Adverse events leading to withdrawal were infrequent, occurring in three (1%) participants in the extension switch population (one in the direct-to-injection group and two in the oral lead-in group) after 24 weeks of cabotegravir plus rilpivirine therapy, and 15 (5%) participants in the randomly assigned long-acting group up to 124 weeks of therapy. No deaths occurred in the extension phase. Overall, cabotegravir plus rilpivirine adverse event type, severity, and frequency were similar across all groups. Injection site reactions were the most common adverse event, occurring after 914 (21%) of 4442 injections in the extension switch population and 3732 (21%) of 17 392 injections in the randomly assigned long-acting group. Injection site reactions were mostly classified as mild-to-moderate in severity and decreased in incidence over time. Four (2%) of 232 participants in the extension switch population and seven (2%) of 283 in the randomly assigned long-acting group withdrew due to injection-related reasons.
After 24 weeks of follow-up, switching to long-acting treatment with or without an oral lead-in phase had similar safety, tolerability, and efficacy, supporting future evaluation of the simpler direct-to-injection approach. The week 124 results for participants randomly assigned originally to the long-acting therapy show long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine remains a durable maintenance therapy with a favourable safety profile.
ViiV Healthcare and Janssen Research & Development.
先前的工作已经证实,在口服标准护理的基础上,每日进行抗病毒治疗的患者,在接受卡替拉韦和利匹韦林口服先导治疗 96 周后,转换为每月长效肌内注射卡替拉韦和利匹韦林,其病毒学抑制效果不劣于原方案。在这里,我们报告了通过直接注射或口服先导途径,将标准护理口服方案转换为长效卡替拉韦和利匹韦林的研究结果。
本研究报告了 FLAIR 研究的第 124 周结果,这是一项正在进行的、III 期、随机、开放性、多中心(11 个国家)试验。在接受标准护理的诱导期 20 周内,病毒学抑制(HIV-1 RNA<50 拷贝/ml)的抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)初治患者,按 1:1 随机分配(1:1)继续接受标准护理口服方案或转换为长效卡替拉韦和利匹韦林(每组 283 人)在 100 周的维持期。随机分组按出生时的性别和基线(诱导前)HIV-1 RNA(<100,000 或≥100,000 拷贝/ml)分层。在基线时接受长效治疗的患者接受卡替拉韦(30mg)和利匹韦林(25mg)每日一次的口服先导治疗至少 4 周,然后才能进行首次注射,并可选择从第 100 周开始每 4 周注射一次长效卡替拉韦(400mg)和利匹韦林(600mg),或停药。在第 100 周时,口服对照药物治疗组的参与者在与研究者讨论后,可以选择转换为长效治疗(扩展转换人群),无论是直接注射还是口服先导治疗(口服先导治疗组),或停药。第 124 周的终点包括血浆 HIV-1 RNA 50 拷贝/ml 或以上和小于 50 拷贝/ml(美国食品和药物管理局[FDA]Snapshot)、确认的病毒学失败(连续两次 HIV-1 RNA≥200 拷贝/ml)以及安全性和耐受性。该研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT02938520。
筛选于 2016 年 10 月 27 日至 2017 年 3 月 24 日进行。在第 100 周时,253 名参与者中有 232 名(92%)进入了扩展期的长效卡替拉韦和利匹韦林治疗阶段(直接注射组 111 名[48%],口服先导组 121 名[52%];扩展转换人群)。在长效治疗组中,283 名随机分配的患者中有 243 名(86%)继续接受长效治疗方案进入扩展期。直接注射组和口服先导组各有 1 名(1%)参与者的 HIV-1 RNA 为 50 拷贝/ml 或以上;110 名(99%)直接注射组和 113 名(93%)口服先导组的参与者在第 124 周 Snapshot 时仍保持抑制(HIV-1 RNA<50 拷贝/ml)。口服先导组较低的抑制率是由非病毒学原因导致的。对于随机分配到长效治疗组的 283 名参与者,227 名(80%)仍处于抑制状态;在第 124 周 Snapshot 时,有 14 名(5%)参与者的 HIV-1 RNA 为 50 拷贝/ml 或以上,其中包括自第 96 周分析以来的另外 5 名参与者。长效治疗组的其余 42 名(15%)参与者没有病毒学数据。导致停药的不良事件很少见,在接受卡替拉韦和利匹韦林治疗 24 周后,扩展转换人群中有 3 名(1%)参与者(直接注射组 1 名,口服先导组 2 名)和长效治疗组的 15 名(5%)参与者发生了不良事件。在扩展期没有死亡发生。总体而言,长效治疗组的卡替拉韦和利匹韦林的不良反应类型、严重程度和频率在所有组中相似。注射部位反应是最常见的不良反应,在扩展转换人群中发生了 914 次(21%)的注射,在长效治疗组中发生了 3732 次(21%)的注射。注射部位反应的严重程度大多为轻度至中度,并随着时间的推移而减少。在扩展转换人群中有 232 名参与者(2%)和长效治疗组中有 283 名参与者(2%)因与注射相关的原因而退出。
在 24 周的随访后,直接注射或口服先导阶段的长效治疗转换具有相似的安全性、耐受性和疗效,支持对更简单的直接注射方法进行进一步评估。对于最初随机分配到长效治疗组的参与者,第 124 周的结果表明长效卡替拉韦和利匹韦林仍是一种具有良好安全性的持久维持治疗方案。
ViiV 医疗保健和杨森研发。