Suppr超能文献

选择性头皮阻滞可降低开颅术后短期术后疼痛评分和阿片类药物使用:病例系列。

Selective scalp block decreases short term post-operative pain scores and opioid use after craniotomy: A case series.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Department of Head & Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

出版信息

J Clin Neurosci. 2021 Nov;93:183-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.09.010. Epub 2021 Sep 21.

Abstract

There is no consensus on the management of post-craniotomy pain. Several randomized controlled trials have examined the use of a regional scalp block for post-craniotomy pain. We aim to investigate whether scalp block affected short or long-term pain levels and opioid use after craniotomy. This study prospectively administered selective scalp blocks (lesser occipital, preauricular nerve block + pin site block) in 20 consecutive patients undergoing craniotomy for semicircular canal dehiscence. Anesthesia, pain, and opioid outcomes in these patients were compared to 40 consecutive historic controls. There was no significant difference in patient demographics between the two groups and no complications related to selective scalp block. The time between the end of procedure and end of anesthesia decreased in the scalp block group (16 vs 21 min, P = 0.047). Pain scores were significantly less in the scalp block group for the first 4 h, after which there was no statistically significant difference. Time to opioid rescue was longer in the scalp block group (3.6 vs 1.8 h, HR 0.487, P = 0.0361) and opioid use in the first 7 h was significantly less in the scalp block group. Total opioid use, outpatient opioid use, and length of stay did not differ. Selective scalp block is a safe and effective tool for short-term management of postoperative pain after craniotomy and decreases the medication requirement during emergence and recovery. Selective scalp block can speed up OR turnover but is not efficacious in the treatment of postoperative pain beyond this point.

摘要

对于开颅术后疼痛的管理,目前尚无共识。一些随机对照试验已经研究了使用头皮区域阻滞来治疗开颅术后疼痛。我们旨在研究头皮阻滞是否会影响开颅术后短期或长期的疼痛水平和阿片类药物的使用。本研究前瞻性地对 20 例因半规管裂行开颅术的连续患者实施选择性头皮阻滞(枕小神经阻滞+皮内针阻滞),并将这些患者的麻醉、疼痛和阿片类药物使用情况与 40 例连续的历史对照进行比较。两组患者的人口统计学特征无显著差异,且无与选择性头皮阻滞相关的并发症。头皮阻滞组的手术结束到麻醉结束时间明显缩短(16 分钟 vs 21 分钟,P=0.047)。头皮阻滞组在前 4 小时的疼痛评分显著较低,之后无统计学差异。头皮阻滞组的阿片类药物解救时间更长(3.6 小时 vs 1.8 小时,HR 0.487,P=0.0361),并且在头 7 小时的阿片类药物使用量也明显较少。总阿片类药物用量、门诊阿片类药物用量和住院时间无差异。选择性头皮阻滞是一种安全有效的工具,可用于开颅术后短期管理术后疼痛,并减少苏醒和恢复期间的药物需求。选择性头皮阻滞可以加快手术室的周转率,但在治疗术后疼痛方面,超过这一时间点则效果不佳。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验