Department of Pediatrics III, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (CTNBS), University Hospital of Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Center for Obstetrics and Pediatrics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
J Neurooncol. 2021 Nov;155(2):193-202. doi: 10.1007/s11060-021-03867-8. Epub 2021 Oct 16.
Survival in recurrent ependymoma (EPN) depends mainly on the extent of resection achieved. When complete resection is not feasible, chemotherapy is often used to extend progression-free and overall survival. However, no consistent effect of chemotherapy on survival has been found in patients with recurrent EPN.
Systemic chemotherapeutic treatment of 138 patients enrolled in the German HIT-REZ-studies was analyzed. Survival depending on the use of chemotherapy, disease-stabilization rates (RR), duration of response (DOR) and time to progression (TTP) were estimated.
Median age at first recurrence was 7.6 years (IQR: 4.0-13.6). At first recurrence, median PFS and OS were 15.3 (CI 13.3-20.0) and 36.9 months (CI 29.7-53.4), respectively. The Hazard Ratio for the use of chemotherapy in local recurrences in a time-dependent Cox-regression analysis was 0.99 (CI 0.74-1.33). Evaluable responses for 140 applied chemotherapies were analyzed, of which sirolimus showed the best RR (50%) and longest median TTP [11.51 (CI 3.98; 14.0) months] in nine patients, with the strongest impact found when sirolimus was used as a monotherapy. Seven patients with progression-free survival > 12 months after subtotal/no-resection facilitated by chemotherapy were found. No definitive survival advantage for any drug in a specific molecularly defined EPN type was found.
No survival advantage for the general use of chemotherapy in recurrent EPN was found. In cases with incomplete resection, chemotherapy was able to extend survival in individual cases. Sirolimus showed the best RR, DOR and TTP out of all drugs analyzed and may warrant further investigation.
复发性室管膜瘤(EPN)的生存主要取决于切除的范围。当无法进行完全切除时,通常会使用化疗来延长无进展生存期和总生存期。然而,在复发性 EPN 患者中,尚未发现化疗对生存有一致的影响。
分析了纳入德国 HIT-REZ 研究的 138 名患者的系统性化疗治疗情况。根据化疗的使用情况、疾病稳定率(RR)、缓解持续时间(DOR)和进展时间(TTP)来评估生存率。
首次复发时的中位年龄为 7.6 岁(IQR:4.0-13.6)。首次复发时,中位 PFS 和 OS 分别为 15.3 个月(CI 13.3-20.0)和 36.9 个月(CI 29.7-53.4)。在时间依赖性 Cox 回归分析中,局部复发性化疗使用的风险比为 0.99(CI 0.74-1.33)。对 140 次化疗的可评估反应进行了分析,其中西罗莫司在 9 名患者中显示出最佳 RR(50%)和最长的中位 TTP[11.51 个月(CI 3.98;14.0)],且在作为单药使用时影响最强。在接受化疗后无进展生存时间超过 12 个月的 7 名患者中,发现肿瘤无进一步增大。在特定的分子定义的 EPN 类型中,未发现任何药物有明确的生存优势。
在复发性 EPN 中,并未发现化疗的总体使用有生存优势。在不完全切除的情况下,化疗能够延长个别患者的生存时间。在所有分析的药物中,西罗莫司显示出最佳的 RR、DOR 和 TTP,可能值得进一步研究。