Department of Pediatrics III, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany.
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology and Neurosurgical Clinic, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Jun 1;23(6):1012-1023. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa276.
Survival in recurrent ependymomas in children and adolescents mainly depends on the extent of resection. Studies on repeated radiotherapy and chemotherapy at relapse have shown conflicting results.
Using data from the German multi-center E-HIT-REZ-2005 study, we examined the role of local therapy and the efficacy of chemotherapy with blockwise temozolomide (TMZ) in children and adolescents with recurrent ependymomas.
Fifty-three patients with a median age of 6.9 years (1.25-25.4) at first recurrence and a median follow-up time of 36 months (2-115) were recruited. Gross- and near-total resection (GTR/NTR) were achieved in 34 (64.2%) patients and associated with a markedly improved 5-year overall survival (OS) of 48.7% vs. 5.3% in less than GTR/NTR. Radiotherapy showed no improvement in OS following complete resection (OS: 70 (CI: 19.9-120.1) vs. 95 (CI: 20.7-169.4) months), but an advantage was found in less than GTR/NTR (OS: 22 (CI: 12.7-31.3) vs. 7 (CI: 0-15.8) months). Following the application of TMZ, disease progression was observed in most evaluable cases (18/21). A subsequent change to oral etoposide and trofosfamide showed no improved response. PF-A EPN were most abundant in relapses (n = 27). RELA-positive EPN (n = 5) had a 5-year OS of 0%.
The extent of resection is the most important predictor of survival at relapse. Focal re-irradiation is a useful approach if complete resection cannot be achieved, but no additional benefit was seen after GTR/NTR. Longer-term disease stabilization (>6 months) mediated by TMZ occurred in a small number of cases (14.3%).
儿童和青少年复发性室管膜瘤的生存主要取决于切除的范围。关于复发时重复放疗和化疗的研究结果存在冲突。
利用德国多中心 E-HIT-REZ-2005 研究的数据,我们研究了局部治疗在儿童和青少年复发性室管膜瘤中的作用,以及采用 TMZ 进行化疗的疗效。
53 例患者在首次复发时的中位年龄为 6.9 岁(1.25-25.4),中位随访时间为 36 个月(2-115)。34 例患者(64.2%)实现了大体全切除(GTR/NTR),与非 GTR/NTR 相比,5 年总生存率(OS)显著提高,分别为 48.7%和 5.3%。完全切除后放疗并不能提高 OS(OS:70(CI:19.9-120.1)vs.95(CI:20.7-169.4)个月),但在非 GTR/NTR 中则有优势(OS:22(CI:12.7-31.3)vs.7(CI:0-15.8)个月)。TMZ 应用后,大多数可评估病例(18/21)观察到疾病进展。随后改用口服依托泊苷和替莫唑胺,反应未见改善。PF-A EPN 在复发中最为丰富(n=27)。RELA 阳性 EPN(n=5)的 5 年 OS 为 0%。
切除范围是复发时生存的最重要预测因素。如果无法实现完全切除,局部再放疗是一种有用的方法,但在 GTR/NTR 后未见额外获益。少数病例(14.3%)通过 TMZ 实现了较长时间的疾病稳定(>6 个月)。