Leiden University, Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), P.O. Box 9518, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.
University of Vigo, Department of Plant Biology and Soil Science, As Lagoas, Marcosende, 32004 Ourense, Spain.
J Agric Food Chem. 2021 Oct 27;69(42):12527-12540. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c01382. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
The rapid development of nanotechnology influences the developments within the agro-sector. An example is provided by the production of nanoenabled pesticides with the intention to optimize the efficiency of the pesticides. At the same time, it is important to collect information on the unintended and unwanted adverse effects of emerging nanopesticides on nontarget plants. Currently, this information is limited. In the present study, we compared the effects of a nanoformulation of atrazine (NPATZ) and the nonencapsulated atrazine formulation (ATZ) on physiological responses, defense mechanisms, and nutrient displacement in lettuce over time with the applied concentrations ranging from 0.3 to 3 mg atrazine per kg soil. Our results revealed that both NPATZ and ATZ induced significant decreases in plant biomass, chlorophyll content, and protein content. Additionally, exposure to NPATZ and ATZ caused oxidative stress to the lettuce plant and significantly elevated the activities of the tested ROS scavenger enzymes in plant tissues. These results indicate that NPATZ and ATZ cause distinct adverse impacts on lettuce plants. When comparing the adverse effects in plants after exposure to NPATZ and ATZ, no obvious differences in plant biomass and chlorophyll content were observed between NPATZ and ATZ treatments at the same exposure concentration regardless of exposure duration. An enhanced efficiency of the active ingredient of the nanopesticide as compared to the conventional formulation was observed after long-term exposure to the high concentration of NPATZ, as it induced higher impacts on plants in terms of the end points of the contents of protein, superoxide anion (Ȯ), and MDA, and the activities of stress-related enzymes as compared to the same concentration of ATZ. Furthermore, exposure to both NPATZ and ATZ disrupted the uptake of mineral nutrients in plants, and the differences in the displacement of nutrients between the NPATZ and ATZ treatments depended on the element type, plant organ, exposure concentration, and time. Overall, the application dose of a nanopesticide should balance their increased herbicidal efficiency with the long-term adverse effects in order to maximize the desired impact while minimizing adverse impacts; only then will we be able to understand the potential impact of nanopesticides on the environment.
纳米技术的快速发展影响着农业领域的发展。例如,生产纳米农药旨在提高农药的效率。与此同时,收集有关新兴纳米农药对非靶标植物产生的意外和不需要的不良影响的信息非常重要。目前,这方面的信息非常有限。在本研究中,我们比较了纳米阿特拉津(NPATZ)制剂和未封装阿特拉津制剂(ATZ)对生菜的生理反应、防御机制和养分替代作用的影响,应用浓度范围为 0.3 至 3 毫克阿特拉津/千克土壤。我们的研究结果表明,NPATZ 和 ATZ 都显著降低了植物生物量、叶绿素含量和蛋白质含量。此外,NPATZ 和 ATZ 暴露会导致生菜植物产生氧化应激,并显著提高植物组织中测试的 ROS 清除酶的活性。这些结果表明,NPATZ 和 ATZ 对生菜植物造成了明显的不良影响。当比较 NPATZ 和 ATZ 暴露后植物的不良影响时,无论暴露时间如何,在相同暴露浓度下,NPATZ 和 ATZ 处理之间的植物生物量和叶绿素含量没有明显差异。在长期高浓度 NPATZ 暴露下,纳米农药的有效成分效率明显提高,因为与相同浓度的 ATZ 相比,它对植物的蛋白质含量、超氧阴离子(Ȯ)和 MDA 含量以及与应激相关的酶活性等终点的影响更高。此外,NPATZ 和 ATZ 暴露都会破坏植物对矿物质养分的吸收,NPATZ 和 ATZ 处理之间的养分替代差异取决于元素类型、植物器官、暴露浓度和时间。总的来说,纳米农药的应用剂量应在提高其除草效率与长期不良影响之间取得平衡,以最大限度地发挥理想影响,同时将不良影响降至最低;只有这样,我们才能了解纳米农药对环境的潜在影响。