• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用每个受试者多个同步结局样本以提高研究效率。

Employing multiple synchronous outcome samples per subject to improve study efficiency.

机构信息

, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Oct 17;21(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01414-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12874-021-01414-7
PMID:34657591
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8520627/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accuracy can be improved by taking multiple synchronous samples from each subject in a study to estimate the endpoint of interest if sample values are not highly correlated. If feasible, it is useful to assess the value of this cluster approach when planning studies. Multiple assessments may be the only method to increase power to an acceptable level if the number of subjects is limited.

METHODS

The main aim is to estimate the difference in outcome between groups of subjects by taking one or more synchronous primary outcome samples or measurements. A summary statistic from multiple samples per subject will typically have a lower sampling error. The number of subjects can be balanced against the number of synchronous samples to minimize the sampling error, subject to design constraints. This approach can include estimating the optimum number of samples given the cost per subject and the cost per sample.

RESULTS

The accuracy improvement achieved by taking multiple samples depends on the intra-class correlation (ICC). The lower the ICC, the greater the benefit that can accrue. If the ICC is high, then a second sample will provide little additional information about the subject's true value. If the ICC is very low, adding a sample can be equivalent to adding an extra subject. Benefits of multiple samples include the ability to reduce the number of subjects in a study and increase both the power and the available alpha. If, for example, the ICC is 35%, adding a second measurement can be equivalent to adding 48% more subjects to a single measurement study.

CONCLUSION

A study's design can sometimes be improved by taking multiple synchronous samples. It is useful to evaluate this strategy as an extension of a single sample design. An Excel workbook is provided to allow researchers to explore the most appropriate number of samples to take in a given setting.

摘要

背景

如果样本值相关性不高,则通过从研究中的每个个体中多次采集同步样本,以估计感兴趣的终点,可提高准确性。如果可行,在研究计划时评估这种聚类方法的价值是很有用的。如果研究对象数量有限,则多次评估可能是唯一一种可将效能提高到可接受水平的方法。

方法

主要目的是通过采集一个或多个同步主要结局样本或测量值,来估计个体之间结局的差异。每个个体多个样本的汇总统计量通常具有较低的抽样误差。可以根据每个个体的成本和每个样本的成本,在设计约束下,平衡研究对象的数量和同步样本的数量,以最小化抽样误差。该方法可包括根据研究对象的成本和样本的成本,来估计给定条件下的最佳样本数量。

结果

采集多个样本可实现的准确性提高取决于组内相关系数(ICC)。ICC 越低,可获得的收益越大。如果 ICC 较高,则第二个样本提供的关于个体真实值的附加信息很少。如果 ICC 非常低,增加一个样本等同于增加一个额外的个体。多次样本的好处包括能够减少研究中的研究对象数量,并提高效能和可用的α值。例如,如果 ICC 为 35%,则增加第二次测量相当于将单测量研究中的个体数量增加 48%。

结论

通过采集多个同步样本,有时可以改进研究的设计。作为单次样本设计的扩展,评估这种策略是有用的。提供了一个 Excel 工作簿,允许研究人员在给定的情况下探索最合适的采样数量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3172/8520627/80180ffc3731/12874_2021_1414_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3172/8520627/4c109f24f9b5/12874_2021_1414_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3172/8520627/fd037b31f4bc/12874_2021_1414_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3172/8520627/80180ffc3731/12874_2021_1414_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3172/8520627/4c109f24f9b5/12874_2021_1414_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3172/8520627/fd037b31f4bc/12874_2021_1414_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3172/8520627/80180ffc3731/12874_2021_1414_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Employing multiple synchronous outcome samples per subject to improve study efficiency.采用每个受试者多个同步结局样本以提高研究效率。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Oct 17;21(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01414-7.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Optimal design of longitudinal data analysis using generalized estimating equation models.使用广义估计方程模型的纵向数据分析的优化设计。
Biom J. 2017 Mar;59(2):315-330. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201600107. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
4
The cluster randomized crossover trial: The effects of attrition in the AB/BA design and how to account for it in sample size calculations.群组随机交叉试验:AB/BA 设计中损耗的影响及其在样本量计算中的处理方法。
Clin Trials. 2020 Aug;17(4):420-429. doi: 10.1177/1740774520913042. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
5
Prior distributions for the intracluster correlation coefficient, based on multiple previous estimates, and their application in cluster randomized trials.基于多个先前估计值的组内相关系数的先验分布及其在整群随机试验中的应用。
Clin Trials. 2005;2(2):108-18. doi: 10.1191/1740774505cn072oa.
6
Covariate-adjusted confidence interval for the intraclass correlation coefficient.调整协变量后的组内相关系数置信区间。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Sep;36(1):244-53. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
7
The detection of gene-environment interaction for continuous traits: should we deal with measurement error by bigger studies or better measurement?连续性状基因-环境相互作用的检测:我们应该通过更大规模的研究还是更好的测量方法来处理测量误差?
Int J Epidemiol. 2003 Feb;32(1):51-7. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyg002.
8
Calculating sample sizes for cluster randomized trials: we can keep it simple and efficient!计算整群随机试验的样本量:我们可以保持简单和高效!
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Nov;65(11):1212-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.06.002.
9
A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.在群组随机试验和拟合二项结局的 GEE 型边缘模型的背景下,一种现成的改进方法,可以用于估计群组内相关性。
Clin Trials. 2019 Feb;16(1):41-51. doi: 10.1177/1740774518803635. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
10
Is the R coefficient of interest in cluster randomized trials with a binary outcome?在二分类结局的整群随机试验中,R 系数是否有意义?
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Sep;29(9):2470-2480. doi: 10.1177/0962280219900200. Epub 2020 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
A multi-sensor approach to improve interpretability of the 6-min walk test as an outcome in muscular dystrophies: an observational study.一种多传感器方法以提高6分钟步行试验作为肌营养不良症结局指标的可解释性:一项观察性研究。
Brain Commun. 2025 Jun 5;7(3):fcaf205. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf205. eCollection 2025.
2
Statistical considerations for repeatability and reproducibility of quantitative imaging biomarkers.定量成像生物标志物重复性和再现性的统计学考量
BJR Open. 2022 Aug 22;4(1):20210083. doi: 10.1259/bjro.20210083. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of within-subject and between-subject biological variation estimates of 20 haematological parameters.系统回顾和荟萃分析 20 项血液学参数的个体内和个体间生物变异估计值。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019 Dec 18;58(1):25-32. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2019-0658.
2
Reflection on modern methods: calculating a sample size for a repeatability sub-study to correct for measurement error in a single continuous exposure.关于现代方法的思考:计算可重复性子研究的样本量,以校正单个连续暴露测量误差。
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Oct 1;48(5):1721-1726. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz055.
3
Feasibility, reliability, and validity of using accelerometers to measure physical activities of patients with stroke during inpatient rehabilitation.
使用加速度计测量住院康复期间脑卒中患者身体活动的可行性、可靠性和有效性。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 31;13(12):e0209607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209607. eCollection 2018.
4
The multivariate physical activity signature associated with metabolic health in children.与儿童代谢健康相关的多变量身体活动特征。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Aug 15;15(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0707-z.
5
A note on statistical repeatability and study design for high-throughput assays.关于高通量检测的统计可重复性和研究设计的说明
Stat Med. 2017 Feb 28;36(5):790-798. doi: 10.1002/sim.7175. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
6
Methods for sample size determination in cluster randomized trials.整群随机试验中样本量确定的方法。
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;44(3):1051-67. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv113. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
7
Latanoprost for open-angle glaucoma (UKGTS): a randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial.拉坦前列素治疗开角型青光眼(英国青光眼治疗研究组):一项随机、多中心、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet. 2015 Apr 4;385(9975):1295-304. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62111-5. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
8
Comparison of confidence interval methods for an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).组内相关系数(ICC)置信区间方法的比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Nov 22;14:121. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-121.
9
Calculating sample sizes for cluster randomized trials: we can keep it simple and efficient!计算整群随机试验的样本量:我们可以保持简单和高效!
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Nov;65(11):1212-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.06.002.
10
Pitfalls and important issues in testing reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients in orthopaedic research.在骨科研究中使用组内相关系数测试可靠性时的陷阱和重要问题。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2012 Jun;4(2):149-55. doi: 10.4055/cios.2012.4.2.149. Epub 2012 May 17.