• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于现代方法的思考:计算可重复性子研究的样本量,以校正单个连续暴露测量误差。

Reflection on modern methods: calculating a sample size for a repeatability sub-study to correct for measurement error in a single continuous exposure.

机构信息

Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

出版信息

Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Oct 1;48(5):1721-1726. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz055.

DOI:10.1093/ije/dyz055
PMID:31329929
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6857752/
Abstract

Using a continuous exposure variable that is measured with random error in a univariable linear regression model leads to regression dilution bias: the observed association between the exposure and outcome is smaller than it would be if the true value of the exposure could be used. A repeatability sub-study, where a sample of study participants have their data measured again, can be used to correct for this bias. It is important to perform a sample size calculation for such a sub-study, to ensure that correction factors can be estimated with sufficient precision. We describe how a previously published method can be used to calculate the sample size from the anticipated size of the correction factor and its desired precision, and demonstrate this approach using the example of the cross-sectional studies conducted as part of the International Project on Cardiovascular Disease in Russia study. We also provide correction factors calculated from repeat data from the UK Biobank study, which can be used to help plan future repeatability studies.

摘要

在单变量线性回归模型中,使用具有随机误差的连续暴露变量会导致回归稀释偏差:暴露与结果之间的观察到的关联比如果可以使用暴露的真实值时要小。重复性子研究可以用于纠正这种偏差,其中研究参与者的样本再次测量其数据。对于此类子研究,进行样本量计算非常重要,以确保可以以足够的精度估计校正因子。我们描述了如何使用先前发表的方法根据预期的校正因子大小及其所需的精度来计算样本量,并使用作为俄罗斯心血管疾病国际项目一部分进行的横断面研究的示例演示了这种方法。我们还提供了从英国生物库研究的重复数据中计算出的校正因子,这些因子可用于帮助计划未来的可重复性研究。

相似文献

1
Reflection on modern methods: calculating a sample size for a repeatability sub-study to correct for measurement error in a single continuous exposure.关于现代方法的思考:计算可重复性子研究的样本量,以校正单个连续暴露测量误差。
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Oct 1;48(5):1721-1726. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz055.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Regression dilution bias: tools for correction methods and sample size calculation.回归稀释偏倚:校正方法和样本量计算工具。
Ups J Med Sci. 2012 Aug;117(3):279-83. doi: 10.3109/03009734.2012.668143. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
4
When should one adjust for measurement error in baseline variables in observational studies?在观察性研究中,何时应该对基线变量中的测量误差进行校正?
Biom J. 2011 Feb;53(1):28-39. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201000038. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
5
The detection of gene-environment interaction for continuous traits: should we deal with measurement error by bigger studies or better measurement?连续性状基因-环境相互作用的检测:我们应该通过更大规模的研究还是更好的测量方法来处理测量误差?
Int J Epidemiol. 2003 Feb;32(1):51-7. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyg002.
6
The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: a comparative study of Dahlberg's formula.样本量和偏倚对误差估计可靠性的影响:Dahlberg 公式的比较研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Apr;34(2):158-63. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr010. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
7
Exploring regression dilution bias using repeat measurements of 2858 variables in ≤49 000 UK Biobank participants.利用英国生物库中≤49000 名参与者的 2858 个变量的重复测量来探索回归稀释偏差。
Int J Epidemiol. 2023 Oct 5;52(5):1545-1556. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyad082.
8
Adjustment for regression dilution in epidemiological regression analyses.流行病学回归分析中回归稀释的校正。
Ann Epidemiol. 1998 Jan;8(1):56-63. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(97)00107-5.
9
Sampling Strategies for Internal Validation Samples for Exposure Measurement-Error Correction: A Study of Visceral Adipose Tissue Measures Replaced by Waist Circumference Measures.暴露测量误差校正的内部验证样本的抽样策略:腰围替代内脏脂肪组织测量值的研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Sep 1;190(9):1935-1947. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab114.
10
Implications of measurement error in exposure for the sample sizes of case-control studies.暴露因素测量误差对病例对照研究样本量的影响。
Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Feb 15;139(4):415-21. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117014.

引用本文的文献

1
Plasma Concentrations of Gut Hormones Acyl Ghrelin and Peptide YY and Subsequent Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Molecular Tumor Subtypes.血浆中肠激素酰基生长素和肽 YY 的浓度与结直肠癌的后续风险和分子肿瘤亚型。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2023 Feb 6;16(2):75-87. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-22-0325.
2
Within-person reproducibility of proteoforms related to inflammation and renal dysfunction.个体内炎症和肾功能障碍相关蛋白形式的可重复性。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 6;12(1):7426. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11520-1.
3
Employing multiple synchronous outcome samples per subject to improve study efficiency.采用每个受试者多个同步结局样本以提高研究效率。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Oct 17;21(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01414-7.
4
Untreated hypertension in Russian 35-69 year olds - a cross-sectional study.俄罗斯 35-69 岁未治疗高血压的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233801. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233801. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Know Your Heart: Rationale, design and conduct of a cross-sectional study of cardiovascular structure, function and risk factors in 4500 men and women aged 35-69 years from two Russian cities, 2015-18.了解你的心脏:2015 - 2018年对来自俄罗斯两个城市的4500名35至69岁男性和女性进行的心血管结构、功能及危险因素横断面研究的基本原理、设计与实施
Wellcome Open Res. 2018 Dec 3;3:67. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14619.3. eCollection 2018.
2
UK biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age.英国生物银行:一个用于识别多种中老年复杂疾病病因的开放获取资源。
PLoS Med. 2015 Mar 31;12(3):e1001779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779. eCollection 2015 Mar.
3
A toolkit for measurement error correction, with a focus on nutritional epidemiology.一个用于测量误差校正的工具包,重点关注营养流行病学。
Stat Med. 2014 May 30;33(12):2137-55. doi: 10.1002/sim.6095. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
4
Random measurement error and regression dilution bias.随机测量误差和回归稀释偏倚。
BMJ. 2010 Jun 23;340:c2289. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2289.
5
The effect of measurement error in risk factors that change over time in cohort studies: do simple methods overcorrect for 'regression dilution'?队列研究中随时间变化的危险因素测量误差的影响:简单方法是否对“回归稀释”过度校正?
Int J Epidemiol. 2005 Dec;34(6):1359-68. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyi148. Epub 2005 Jul 28.
6
Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision.以所需精度估计组内相关系数时的样本量要求。
Stat Med. 2002 May 15;21(9):1331-5. doi: 10.1002/sim.1108.
7
Planning a reproducibility study: how many subjects and how many replicates per subject for an expected width of the 95 per cent confidence interval of the intraclass correlation coefficient.规划一项可重复性研究:为使组内相关系数的95%置信区间达到预期宽度,需要多少受试者以及每个受试者需要多少重复测量。
Stat Med. 2001 Nov 15;20(21):3205-14. doi: 10.1002/sim.935.
8
Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies.可靠性研究的样本量与最优设计。
Stat Med. 1998 Jan 15;17(1):101-10. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980115)17:1<101::aid-sim727>3.0.co;2-e.
9
Measurement error.测量误差。
BMJ. 1996 Sep 21;313(7059):744. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7059.744.
10
Sample size requirements for reliability studies.可靠性研究的样本量要求。
Stat Med. 1987 Jun;6(4):441-8. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780060404.