• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨方言新词汇学习与借用

Cross-Dialectal Novel Word Learning and Borrowing.

作者信息

Wu Junru, Zheng Wei, Han Mengru, Schiller Niels O

机构信息

Laboratory of Language Cognition and Evolution, Department of Chinese Language and Literature, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.

Leiden University Centre for Linguistics, Leiden, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 30;12:734527. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.734527. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.734527
PMID:34659047
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8515950/
Abstract

The objective of this paper was to study the cognitive processes underlying cross-dialectal novel word borrowing and loanword establishment in a Standard-Chinese-to-Shanghainese (SC-SH) auditory lexical learning and borrowing experiment. To investigate these underlying cognitive processes, SC-SH bi-dialectals were compared with SC monolectals as well as bi-dialectals of SC and other Chinese dialects (OD) to investigate the influence of short-term and long-term linguistic experience. Both comprehension and production borrowings were tested. This study found that early and proficient bi-dialectism, even if it is not directly related to the recipient dialect of lexical borrowing, has a protective effect on the ability of cross-dialectal lexical borrowing in early adulthood. Bi-dialectals tend to add separate lexical representations for incidentally encountered dialectal variants, while monolectals tend to assimilate dialectal variants to standard forms. Bi-dialectals, but not monolectals, use etymologically related morphemes between the source and recipient dialects to create nonce-borrowing compounds. Dialectal variability facilitates lexical borrowing enriching instead of increasing the short-term lexical experience of learners. The long-term bi-dialectal experience of individuals, as well as their short-term exposure to each specific loanword, may collectively shape the route of lexical evolution of co-evolving linguistic varieties.

摘要

本文的目的是在一项从标准中文到上海话(SC-SH)的听觉词汇学习与借用实验中,研究跨方言新造词借用和外来词确立背后的认知过程。为了探究这些潜在的认知过程,将SC-SH双语者与只会说标准中文的人以及标准中文和其他汉语方言(OD)的双语者进行比较,以考察短期和长期语言经验的影响。同时测试了理解性借用和产出性借用。本研究发现,早期且熟练掌握双语,即使与词汇借用的接受方言没有直接关联,在成年早期也对跨方言词汇借用能力具有保护作用。双语者倾向于为偶然遇到的方言变体添加单独的词汇表征,而单语者则倾向于将方言变体同化为标准形式。双语者而非单语者会利用源方言和接受方言之间词源相关的语素创造临时借用的复合词。方言变体促进了词汇借用,丰富而非增加了学习者的短期词汇经验。个体的长期双语经验以及他们对每个特定外来词的短期接触,可能共同塑造共同演变的语言变体的词汇演变路径。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09f4/8515950/b25030a66751/fpsyg-12-734527-g0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09f4/8515950/305b28e67ea4/fpsyg-12-734527-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09f4/8515950/37051507bd67/fpsyg-12-734527-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09f4/8515950/68604402ac17/fpsyg-12-734527-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09f4/8515950/f163eaeed027/fpsyg-12-734527-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09f4/8515950/ea586fa82caa/fpsyg-12-734527-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09f4/8515950/593580b2b8ae/fpsyg-12-734527-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09f4/8515950/3007d893231f/fpsyg-12-734527-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09f4/8515950/af3623229a29/fpsyg-12-734527-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09f4/8515950/d25b6d4cf742/fpsyg-12-734527-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09f4/8515950/b264be6a638a/fpsyg-12-734527-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09f4/8515950/74126a2408cb/fpsyg-12-734527-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09f4/8515950/b25030a66751/fpsyg-12-734527-g0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09f4/8515950/305b28e67ea4/fpsyg-12-734527-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09f4/8515950/37051507bd67/fpsyg-12-734527-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09f4/8515950/68604402ac17/fpsyg-12-734527-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09f4/8515950/f163eaeed027/fpsyg-12-734527-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09f4/8515950/ea586fa82caa/fpsyg-12-734527-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09f4/8515950/593580b2b8ae/fpsyg-12-734527-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09f4/8515950/3007d893231f/fpsyg-12-734527-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09f4/8515950/af3623229a29/fpsyg-12-734527-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09f4/8515950/d25b6d4cf742/fpsyg-12-734527-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09f4/8515950/b264be6a638a/fpsyg-12-734527-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09f4/8515950/74126a2408cb/fpsyg-12-734527-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09f4/8515950/b25030a66751/fpsyg-12-734527-g0012.jpg

相似文献

1
Cross-Dialectal Novel Word Learning and Borrowing.跨方言新词汇学习与借用
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 30;12:734527. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.734527. eCollection 2021.
2
Remote Testing of the Familiar Word Effect With Non-dialectal and Dialectal German-Learning 1-2-Year-Olds.对学习非方言和方言德语的1至2岁儿童的熟悉单词效应进行远程测试。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 2;12:714363. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.714363. eCollection 2021.
3
Effects of Lexical Competition and Dialect Exposure on Phonological Priming.词汇竞争和方言接触对语音启动的影响。
Lang Speech. 2017 Mar;60(1):85-109. doi: 10.1177/0023830916643737. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
4
Where do dialectal effects on speech processing come from? Evidence from a cross-dialect investigation.方言对言语加工的影响源自何处?一项跨方言调查的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Jan;70(1):92-108. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1124896.
5
Dialect Variation Influences the Phonological and Lexical-Semantic Word Processing in Sentences. Electrophysiological Evidence from a Cross-Dialectal Comprehension Study.方言变异影响句子中的语音和词汇语义单词处理。来自跨方言理解研究的电生理学证据。
Front Psychol. 2016 May 27;7:739. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00739. eCollection 2016.
6
The Native Speaker in Italian-Dialects Bilingualism: Insights From the Acquisition of Vicentino by Preschool Children.意大利语方言双语环境中的母语使用者:来自学龄前儿童对维琴察语习得的见解。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 15;12:717639. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717639. eCollection 2021.
7
Effect of early dialectal exposure on adult perception of phonemic vowel length.早期方言接触对成年人音位元音长度感知的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Sep;142(3):1707. doi: 10.1121/1.4995994.
8
Dialectal effects on a clinical Spanish word recognition test.方言对西班牙语临床单词识别测试的影响。
Am J Audiol. 2013 Jun;22(1):74-83. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2012/12-0036).
9
Lexical plasticity in early bilinguals does not alter phoneme categories: II. Experimental evidence.早期双语者的词汇灵活性不会改变音位类别:二、实验证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Dec;21(12):2343-57. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21152.
10
Multivariate decoding methods reveal how speaking two dialects affects executive functions.多元解码方法揭示了说两种方言如何影响执行功能。
Eur J Neurosci. 2023 Mar;57(5):840-853. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15918. Epub 2023 Feb 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Electrophysiological evidence for the coexistence of expectancy fulfillment and semantic integration during the processing of binding and compound nouns.在处理组合名词和复合名词时,预期实现与语义整合共存的电生理证据。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2021 Aug;166:25-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2021.05.004. Epub 2021 May 11.
2
Distributional learning of speech sound categories is gated by sensitive periods.语音类别的分布学习受敏感期调控。
Cognition. 2021 Aug;213:104653. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104653. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
3
Contrasting dynamics of memory consolidation for novel word forms and meanings revealed by behavioral and neurophysiological markers.
通过行为和神经生理标记物揭示的新词形式和意义的记忆巩固的对比动力学。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Aug;117:472-482. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
4
Is the L2 lexicon different from the L1 lexicon? Evidence from novel word lexicalization.第二语言(L2)词汇与第一语言(L1)词汇不同吗?来自新单词词汇化的证据。
Cognition. 2017 Jan;158:147-152. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.026. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
5
The Interlanguage Speech Intelligibility Benefit as Bias Toward Native-Language Phonology.
Iperception. 2015 Nov 16;6(6):2041669515613661. doi: 10.1177/2041669515613661. eCollection 2015 Dec.
6
Distinct morphological processing of recently learned compound words: An ERP study.
Brain Res. 2015 Dec 10;1629:309-17. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.10.029. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
7
Cross-language activation of morphological relatives in cognates: the role of orthographic overlap and task-related processing.同源词中形态相关词的跨语言激活:正字法重叠和任务相关加工的作用。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Feb 2;9:16. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00016. eCollection 2015.
8
Revisiting vocal perception in non-human animals: a review of vowel discrimination, speaker voice recognition, and speaker normalization.重新审视非人类动物的语音感知:元音辨别、说话者语音识别和说话者归一化综述
Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 13;5:1543. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01543. eCollection 2014.
9
Critical periods in speech perception: new directions.言语感知的关键期:新方向。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:173-96. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015104. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
10
Task influences on the production and comprehension of compound words.任务对复合词生成与理解的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2014 Jul;42(5):780-93. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0396-z.