• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为一名无法接受经皮肾镜取石术的孤立肾复杂性感染性结石患者提供多种治疗技能:病例报告

Providing Several Skills to Treat Complex Infectious Stones of Solitary Kidney in a Patient Failed to Undergo Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Case Report.

作者信息

Feng Dechao, Wei Wuran

机构信息

Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2021 Sep 29;8:743813. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.743813. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2021.743813
PMID:34660684
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8511699/
Abstract

Conservative treatment is closely associated with renal deterioration for patients with renal staghorn stones. It is well-recognized that percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is recommended as the first-line treatment of renal stones larger than 2 cm due to its higher stone clearance and cost-effectiveness when compared with other treatment alternatives, such as shockwave lithotripsy and flexible ureteroscopy (FURS). Besides, our findings indicated that miniaturized PCNL could be served as an alternative to PCNL with a higher stone-free rate and a lower hemorrhage risk. Despite the higher cost-effectiveness of PCNL, the management of staghorn stones are still controversial in some special situations, such as a solitary kidney. Herein, we present a case with complex infectious stones of a right-sided solitary kidney, complaining of persistent pain in the right waist. The rarity of this case is that it is difficult to encounter these cotton-like staghorn stones which are clinically resistant to holmium laser lithotripsy, and the particularity is that the patient with solitary kidney failed to undergo PCNL. We found that the combination of intermittently high-frequency oscillation and flexible ureteroscopy forceps might contribute to treat the complex infectious stones in a patient with solitary kidney. Our surgical experience might be beneficial to such patients undergoing flexible ureteroscopy in clinical practice.

摘要

对于鹿角形肾结石患者,保守治疗与肾功能恶化密切相关。众所周知,经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)因其结石清除率高且与其他治疗方法(如冲击波碎石术和软性输尿管镜检查(FURS))相比具有成本效益,被推荐作为直径大于2 cm肾结石的一线治疗方法。此外,我们的研究结果表明,微通道经皮肾镜取石术可作为经皮肾镜取石术的替代方法,其结石清除率更高,出血风险更低。尽管经皮肾镜取石术具有较高的成本效益,但在一些特殊情况下,如孤立肾,鹿角形结石的治疗仍存在争议。在此,我们报告一例右侧孤立肾复杂性感染性结石患者,主诉右腰部持续性疼痛。该病例的罕见之处在于临床上很难遇到这种对钬激光碎石术耐药的棉絮状鹿角形结石,其特殊性在于孤立肾患者未能接受经皮肾镜取石术。我们发现,间歇性高频振荡联合软性输尿管镜取石钳可能有助于治疗孤立肾患者的复杂性感染性结石。我们的手术经验可能对临床实践中接受软性输尿管镜检查的此类患者有益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f14/8511699/ed97335edcaa/fsurg-08-743813-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f14/8511699/d78a4bef1de6/fsurg-08-743813-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f14/8511699/ed97335edcaa/fsurg-08-743813-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f14/8511699/d78a4bef1de6/fsurg-08-743813-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f14/8511699/ed97335edcaa/fsurg-08-743813-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Providing Several Skills to Treat Complex Infectious Stones of Solitary Kidney in a Patient Failed to Undergo Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Case Report.为一名无法接受经皮肾镜取石术的孤立肾复杂性感染性结石患者提供多种治疗技能:病例报告
Front Surg. 2021 Sep 29;8:743813. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.743813. eCollection 2021.
2
Treatment for residual stones using flexible ureteroscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy after the management of complex calculi with single-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy.单通道经皮肾镜取石术治疗复杂结石后,采用软性输尿管镜和钬激光碎石术治疗残余结石。
Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Apr;32(3):649-654. doi: 10.1007/s10103-017-2162-5. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
3
Single upper-pole percutaneous access for treatment of > or = 5-cm complex branched staghorn calculi: is shockwave lithotripsy necessary?单用上极经皮肾穿刺通路治疗直径大于或等于5厘米的复杂性分支鹿角形结石:是否需要冲击波碎石术?
J Endourol. 2002 Sep;16(7):477-81. doi: 10.1089/089277902760367430.
4
Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).10 - 20毫米下极结石最佳治疗方法的荟萃分析:可弯曲输尿管镜检查(FURS)与体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)对比经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)
Acta Med Indones. 2018 Jan;50(1):18-25.
5
Clinical efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large kidney stones: A retrospective comparative study.软性输尿管镜与经皮肾镜取石术治疗大肾结石的临床疗效及安全性:一项回顾性对照研究
World J Clin Cases. 2024 Jul 26;12(21):4483-4490. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i21.4483.
6
[Staged retrograde flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones of 2-4 cm in diameter: a randomized controlled trial].[分期逆行软性输尿管镜碎石术与微通道经皮肾镜取石术治疗直径2-4厘米肾结石的随机对照试验]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2016 Dec 20;36(12):1672-1676.
7
Primary SWL Is an Efficient and Cost-Effective Treatment for Lower Pole Renal Stones Between 10 and 20 mm in Size: A Large Single Center Study.首次体外冲击波碎石术是治疗直径10至20毫米的下极肾结石的一种有效且具有成本效益的方法:一项大型单中心研究。
J Endourol. 2017 May;31(5):510-516. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0825. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
8
Combination of debulking single-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy followed by retrograde intrarenal surgery for staghorn stones in solitary kidneys.减瘤单通道经皮肾镜取石术联合逆行肾内手术治疗孤立肾鹿角形结石
Scand J Urol. 2014 Jun;48(3):295-300. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2013.852621. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
9
Flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renal stone burdens that measure 2 to 3 cm: a multi-institutional experience.经皮肾镜取石术与钬激光碎石术治疗 2-3cm 肾结石:多中心经验。
J Endourol. 2010 Oct;24(10):1583-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0629.
10
Treatment selection for urolithiasis: percutaneous nephrolithomy, ureteroscopy, shock wave lithotripsy, and active monitoring.尿路结石的治疗选择:经皮肾镜碎石术、输尿管镜碎石术、体外冲击波碎石术和主动监测。
World J Urol. 2017 Sep;35(9):1395-1399. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2030-8. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of intrarenal pelvic pressure and postoperative fever between standard- and mini-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.标准通道与微通道经皮肾镜取石术的肾内肾盂压力及术后发热比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Jun;9(3):1159-1166. doi: 10.21037/tau.2020.03.30.
2
Efficacy and safety of the tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss and transfusion requirements during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.氨甲环酸减少经皮肾镜取石术失血和输血需求的疗效和安全性:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020 Oct;72(5):579-585. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03826-6. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
3
Management of staghorn stones in special situations.特殊情况下鹿角形结石的处理
Asian J Urol. 2020 Apr;7(2):130-138. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2019.12.014. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
4
The efficacy and safety of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.微型经皮肾镜碎石术与标准经皮肾镜碎石术的疗效和安全性:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Investig Clin Urol. 2020 Mar;61(2):115-126. doi: 10.4111/icu.2020.61.2.115. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
5
The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case report guideline development.CARE 指南:基于共识的临床病例报告指南制定。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jan;67(1):46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
6
Long-term renal fate and prognosis after staghorn calculus management.
J Urol. 1995 May;153(5):1403-7.